Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 153

Large funds need to earn retirement loyalty

This is the third in a series of articles highlighting the leadership attributes that can help superannuation industry executives move from their historical focus on accumulation to a whole of life view and particularly the provision of retirement income.

For executives in the super industry, driving change from an accumulation to a whole of life focus is a major change management exercise. How do you drive change management? Leadership expert Harvard’s John Kotter identifies creating a sense of urgency as step 1 of the 8-step programme he prescribes in Leading Change.

Where is the sense of urgency?

It’s often said that we need a ‘burning platform’ to create the sense of urgency to drive change. While APRA statistics suggest we should have that urgency due to poor member retention, rarely do we hear the word ‘fire’ from our executives.

According to the 2015 APRA report, over 50% of funds are losing more accounts than are coming in and, likewise, over 50% have higher outflows than inflows when benefits payments are included. And most funds are doing a poor job in retaining members into pension phase, with the number of lump sum payments dominating pension account openings by a factor of four to one.

The retention problems can be devastating for fund economics and, like demographic changes, can manifest themselves slowly at first and be overlooked. But continued gradual losses of members or outflows erode a fund’s economic competitiveness. The industry would appear to have an impending loyalty problem.

Fred Reichheld has been perhaps the most articulate advocate of ‘loyalty management’ as an imperative of business success. The author of The Ultimate Question and creator of the Net Promoter Score championed the idea that loyalty leadership was the key driver of success in many businesses.

Loyalty drives firm economics. Firms with better client loyalty enjoy both higher revenues and lower costs. Higher revenues come from more sales to existing clients, the additional revenues from not losing clients or holding onto them longer, and from referrals from satisfied clients. Lower costs come from satisfied clients having a lower cost to serve for many reasons (eg acquisition costs are defrayed over a longer tenured relationship). And lower marketing costs accrue from referral.

Driving client loyalty

Even before I joined Vanguard in 1980, the redemption ratio (the inverse of retention) was a key driving variable. We drove redemption rates to less than half the industry average. That meant Vanguard each year had to sell billions less, later tens of billions less, and today hundreds of billions less than competitors to exceed them on cash flows. That fact, certainly more than large or clever marketing spend, was the driver in making Vanguard the top US mutual funds manager by cashflow for nearly every one of the last 20 years.

Client loyalty is something you have to earn and can’t buy or take for granted. It’s multi-dimensional as clients appraise your features and services against competing offers. It’s built on trust over time, is hard won and easily lost. It’s often built on a relationship - personal or brand-related - and a sense of engagement. The heart of a firm’s strategy and execution should be beating to earning client loyalty.

But it’s also obvious that there are certain critical points in customers’ lives when client loss is more likely. The two most important for our industry are job change and approaching retirement. We’ll focus on retention at retirement here. People over 50 control more than 60% of assets in the super system and balances are, on average, much larger for pre-retirees and retirees than for younger members.

Member retention in retirement

It should be an urgent and galvanising problem that many superannuation funds are losing more than 90% of their members going into retirement phase. Ironic indeed that a fund should nurture its members throughout their working careers and then lose them when the fund should be helping them with the ultimate mission of the super industry: assistance through retirement years.

Talking to fund executives, few have really taken the retirement phase loyalty challenge to be a matter of urgency, and there are even some executives who think the fund is only about accumulation. Some funds don’t even offer a pension choice.

It’s a loyalty leadership challenge. A multi-year and multi-dimensional approach to increasing the organisational focus on retirement is needed. The fund needs to demonstrate its credentials and interest in helping members with their journey to and through retirement. Raising awareness that the fund is there for the member in retirement is a key element.

Providing retirement income forecasts is an obvious and effective way to start members thinking about retirement with the fund, supplemented by coaching and advice solutions. Advice is probably the best way to help members with retirement. And as traditional advice won’t reach the vast majority of members, digital advice has to come to the forefront, with the option of triaging to traditional telephone based or face to face advice when needed.

Simplifying the transition to retirement is also critical. A complex transition is the enemy of member loyalty. Behavioural finance research shows how making something easy is a winning strategy for serving members. A default solution, like the government’s mooted Comprehensive Income Product for Retirement, may well be part of the answer.

It's critical to the member that they make the right choice and get the help they need to do so. The right decisions at retirement are challenging and highly personal. Default MySuper may get many members through their accumulation phase but in retirement members will need a personalised solution.

To focus on maintaining loyalty, the right metrics are critical. As Peter Drucker argued, “what gets measured gets improved.” Funds should establish their loyalty metrics around retirement and then work relentlessly to improve them.

Fund executives have a burning platform to move fast on client retention around the retirement phase. They must develop the sense of mission that can motivate their teams around highly measureable goals. Funds that lead and win in maintaining client loyalty through retirement will grow and prosper.

 

Jeremy Duffield is Co-Founder of SuperEd. See www.supered.com.au. He was the Managing Director and Founder of Vanguard Investments Australia, and he retired as Chairman in 2010.

 

  •   28 April 2016
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Improving access to account-based pensions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.