Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 406

Making a positive impact with thematic investing

Last week I read an interesting piece by someone who clearly was not a fan of thematic investing. 

He demonstrated the dangers of jumping on the ‘next big thing’, pointing out, for example, the risks early investors in the automobile faced. The Duryea Motor Wagon Company, the first U.S. car maker, was founded in 1895. Over the next 25 years, 436 car manufacturers came into existence, but 30 years later, almost all had fallen by the wayside as the big three of General Motors, Chrysler and Ford emerged.

More recently, those who committed their hard-earned cash to the online shopping phenomenon via Amazon have been rewarded handsomely, but it’s easy to forget spectacular failures such as etoys.com, Pets.com, Boo.com, which didn’t turn out so happily for investors.

The writer’s conclusion? “Thematic leaps do not axiomatically line the pockets of those willing to finance them.”

Maybe so. But does this mean we should abandon the attempt to profit from trends that have the potential to change the world? Or simply, is it that we need to be smart in how we go about it?

What is thematic investing?

Thematic investors try to identify long-term transformational trends, and the investments that are likely to benefit if those trends play out. Such investments are typically agnostic to industry sectors, or geographical boundaries.

Thematic investing focuses on structural, rather than cyclical trends. These are themes that tend to be one-off shifts that irreversibly change the world, driven by powerful forces such as disruptive technologies or changing demographics and consumer behaviour. By contrast, cyclical themes are typically short- to medium-term, and tend to revert.

An example of structural change is the emergence of e-commerce, which has fundamentally shifted the way goods and services are bought and sold. Another good example is the rise and rise of cybersecurity, which is increasingly becoming a critical threshold component of all technology solutions as more and more of our world goes online.

How can I invest thematically?

Here’s where it gets trickier.

The writer I referred to earlier is right - picking winners is notoriously difficult. For every Amazon or Netflix, there are hundreds, even thousands, of companies trying to exploit the same opportunities, but fail.

For this reason, there are benefits to gaining exposure to a theme in a different way, one that is not an ‘all or nothing’ gamble.

Thematic ETFs take this approach. They typically aim to track an index that measures the performance of a range of companies that have the potential to benefit if the theme plays out. And, like thematic investing more generally, they are typically sector and country agnostic. Diversified exposure means that the inevitable failure of some of these companies will have less of an impact. The hope is that some, or many, will succeed, and that overall the portfolio of companies will increase in value.

…. and when?

As important as the how, is the when.

One model proposes that disruptive technologies, products and ideas typically follow an ‘S’ shaped adoption curve with five stages. The chart below shows the growth, and rate of growth, at each stage.

Source: Jay Jacobs, ‘Investing in Tomorrow – A Whitepaper on Thematic Investing’, Global X

The timing of an investment is largely a trade-off between upside potential and risk.

Investing right at the start of adoption has the highest potential reward but also involves the greatest risk, as the trend is far from established, and there is a high possibility of failure.

Waiting until the later stages involves far less risk, as the theme is well-established. However, the potential rewards will also be less, as the successful progression of the theme will already be reflected in the prices of the investments being considered.

What theme might be in the sweet spot right now?

In 2021, what is a theme that fits the criterion of a ‘one-off shift that irreversibly changes the world, that is long-term in nature, and driven by powerful forces such as disruptive technologies or human behaviour’? One that is neither at the earliest stages, nor has reached maturity.

While we believe there are a few, the candidate we’re focusing on today is climate change.

Global warming is one of the defining challenges of the 21st century. Unaddressed, it will have a catastrophic impact on our planet and the lives of future generations. Many would argue the catastrophe is already unfolding.

Given the dimensions of the challenge, the size of the response and the amount of money needed to be spent on it is correspondingly large.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that to contain the rise in global temperatures to 1.5-2°C above pre-industrial levels by 2100 would require a halving in the level of greenhouse gas emissions (GGE) currently projected by 2050 under the current 2016 Paris Climate Agreement.

Energy currently accounts for around two thirds of global GGE. Global energy producer BP estimates that to achieve the extra GGE cuts suggested by the IPCC would require a 10-fold increase by 2050 in the share of energy derived from renewables - or from around 5% in 2018 to between 40 to 60%.

Meanwhile, the Energy Transitions Committee (ETC), a global organisation of energy producers, financial institutions and environmental groups, believes it is possible to create a prosperous net-zero-emissions economy by mid-century, in which case global warming would be limited to the lower bounds of the Paris Agreement’s target range.

The ETC estimates that the additional investment required to achieve a zero carbon-emissions economy by 2050 will be US$1-2 trillion per annum.

The deep cuts to emissions that will be required to limit global warming call for innovation on a range of climate and environmentally friendly activities. Investors wanting comprehensive access to this thematic are likely to want an investment that provides exposure to a broad range of solutions, including clean energy, electric vehicles, energy efficiency technologies, sustainable food, water efficiency and pollution control.

 

Richard Montgomery is the Marketing Communications Manager at BetaShares, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not address the needs of any individual. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Investment value can go down as well as up.

For more articles and papers from BetaShares, please click here.

To tap into the long-term growth potential of this theme, BetaShares has launched the Climate Change Innovation ETF (ERTH).

 

  •   5 May 2021
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

The role of sustainability in private markets

Thematic ETFs: is the juice worth the squeeze?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.