Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 348

What night moves on the US market mean for Aussie stocks

You wake up in the morning, turn on the radio and the announcer says:

“…and now to the markets overnight, where the US share index fell 100 points - looks like being a black day for the Australian market today”.

If you're lucky you might hear the actual index value that the US drop relates to. If it’s the Dow, it’s currently around 24,000, so 100 points is only 0.4%. Occasionally the voice might compute the percentage for you as your early morning brain clicks into gear.

How Australia reacts in the day ahead 

I studied daily one-day closing price moves on the US S&P500 index and the Australian All Ordinaries index the next day. (At this time of year, the New York market closes 8am Sydney time. The ASX closes at 4pm). This gave 6,882 days of data in the 35-year period from January 1985 to February 2020.

I excluded Monday trading in Australia because of the longer time lag from US Friday close to when Australian trading closes on the Monday. Of course, on all Australian trading days there could well be Asian market events breaking which were not reflected in US markets overnight, but the time gap is much shorter.

My analysis of the results is set out in the table below.

Table 1: Total period – 3 January 1985 to 28 February 2020
Tuesdays to Fridays of All Ords trading

S&P500 move +/- % bigger than this

% of overnights S&P500 does this

% of next days that All Ords ends in same direction

0.0%

100%

65%

0.2%

76%

69%

0.5%

50%

75%

1.0%

24%

82%

1.5%

12%

86%

2.0%

6%

88%

2.5%

4%

90%

5.0%

0.5%

91%

For moves of plus or minus 0.5% or less in the S&P500, there is no reliable pattern on which to base a strong expectation for direction of the next Australian All Ords move – i.e. the Australian market is just as likely to go in the opposite direction to the US about one day in four.

But I found a neat rule of thumb we could pass on to the finance journalists to encourage them to talk percentages while we are pouring milk on the muesli.

When the S&P500 overnight moves more than 2.5% up or down, there is a 90% likelihood the Australian market will move in the same direction. Moves above 2.5% have occurred in 4% of days over the long-term period studied – that is an average of about one trading day a month.

Variations by trading day

It is also interesting to explore variation in these results by trading day and whether there was any change over time in this 35-year period.

Firstly, let us look at trading days – and remember as explained earlier, “I don’t like Mondays”. The following table splits the results for Australian trading days for Tuesdays to Fridays.

Table 2: Days of the week variation (Australian days)
Percentage of days that the All Ords move on close is in the same direction as S&P500 close overnight

S&P 500 move +/- % bigger than this

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

0.0%

64%

66%

64%

67%

0.2%

68%

70%

67%

71%

0.5%

74%

74%

74%

78%

1.0%

82%

80%

82%

84%

1.5%

86%

85%

84%

88%

2.0%

84%

86%

92%

92%

2.5%

86%

88%

94%

94%

5.0%

91%

89%

100%

75%

There is not much of a trend to observe here. The bigger than 2.5% results are slightly lower on Tuesdays and higher Thursdays and Fridays. Perhaps there is a volatility momentum effect through the week when big moves are occurring.

To look at the variation effect over time, I split the analysis into last century and this century, see table 3.

Table 3: 20th Century vs 21st Century
% of next days that the All Ords ends in same direction as S&P500 overnight

S&P 500 move +/- % bigger than this

20th Century
3 Jan 1985 to
29 Dec 2000

21st Century
3 Jan 2001 to
29 Feb 2020

21st Century excess over 20th Century

0.0%

62%

68%

6%

0.2%

65%

72%

7%

0.5%

71%

78%

7%

1.0%

79%

84%

5%

1.5%

81%

89%

8%

2.0%

86%

89%

3%

2.5%

90%

90%

-

5.0%

88%

92%

4%

There is a stronger trend here for following the S&P500 but mainly where there are more data points. Perhaps we could conclude that globalisation and the internet bring a stronger influence in the 21st Century.

Now before you all go off and start day trading with these results, I should add my disclaimer – don’t try this at home! The rule of thumb presented here is for general education purposes so that market commentary is encouraged to talk and think percentages and to give big market moves rational historical context.

Postscript

This article was finalised after 4pm Tuesday 10th March 2020, a time when we saw a classic exception reflected in the ‘rule of thumb’! The S&P500 was down 7.6% the night before, and the All Ords was up 3% at close the next day due to various stimulus packages announced around the world. Events can overtake overnight movements. This opposite direction has happened 10% of the time when the S&P500 moves more than 2.5%.

 

Bruce Gregor is a Demographer and Actuary, and Founder of Financial Demographics. This article is general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

  •   11 March 2020
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

How US midterm elections affect the markets

Why the ASX is losing Its best companies

Why the ASX needs dual-class shares

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.