Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Register

9 October 2026

Home / 195

Watch premiums and discounts in LICs

Independent Investment Research (IIR) has released its December Quarter 2016 review of the LIC sector, sometimes called Listed Managed Investments (LMI). A summary of the performance of the 34 LICs included in the Report is presented below. The full paper with more detailed coverage is available here. As this full review is of the previous quarter, investors should check latest prices which may have moved significantly.

Overall equities performance

For the December 2016 quarter, the S&P/ASX200 was up by 5.2% following the US market rally after Trump’s election. Large cap equities, and especially resources stocks, contributed most to this performance. Small caps, down 2.5% for the quarter, still managed an overall gain for the year of 13.2%. For the 12 months to December 2016, the S&P/ASX200 was up 11.8%.

LIC performance

IIR’s analysis uses two different measures. The first is total returns (share price gain or loss plus dividends) which represents the actual return received by shareholders from their investment. The second is pre-tax NTA plus dividends, which is better for evaluating manager performance.

Using this second metric, the best performing fund for the December quarter was Global Master Fund (ASX:GFL) with a 15.5% increase in portfolio value due to a strong share price performance of its core holding, Berkshire Hathaway. As the overall market performed well, so too did the majority of LICs included in the Review. However, some small cap LICs had negative returns.

If using the first metric, Westoz (ASX:WIC) was the best performer for the quarter with an 8.1% total return in share price and dividends due to its resources focus. This reduced the discount to pre-tax NTA from 16.8% at 30 September 2016 to 9.4% at 31 December 2016.

Premiums and discounts

As at 31 December 2016, 12 of the 34 LICs covered were trading at a premium to pre-tax NTA. The largest of these was Mirrabooka Investments (ASX:MIR) at 25.8%, followed by WAM Capital (ASX:WAM) and WAM Research (ASX:WAX), each at 20.7%.

At the other end of the scale, Global Master Fund (ASX:GFL) was trading at the largest discount to pre-tax NTA at 22.3%, widening from 15.8% as at 30 September 2016. Over the past three years, GFL’s discount has averaged 14.4%.

The table below shows the quarterly performance for each of the 34 funds as measured by both metrics mentioned above, along with their premium/discount to pre-tax NTA:

Leisa Bell is Assistant Editor at Cuffelinks.

  •   23 March 2017
  • 5
  •      
  •   
5 Comments
Ashley
March 22, 2017

The table describes returns in terms of “share price including dividends”. Is that different from ‘total returns’ which is a widely understood term? (or even “total returns including dividends”). Share price does not ‘include’ dividends. It should say ‘share price gain/loss plus dividends’, which is the same as total returns.

Sceptical
March 23, 2017

Its kind of pointless to even reference the movement in the NTA as the investor into the LIC structure never receives that performance. The assumption that is made is the share price will move according to the movement in the NTA. But the real performance the investor receives is just the performance in the share price (what they bought it for and then what they sell it for/what it is currently trading at) + dividends. The structure itself is flawed and surely will be replaced with active ETFs if more providers come to market to offer choice!

Cat Daddy
March 23, 2017

Ashley.

What part did I miss. The article under sub heading LIC performance reads "(share price gain or loss plus dividends)"

Graham Hand
March 23, 2017

Hi CD, good pick up but we changed the previous wording after receiving Ashley's comment. We left his comment after the article as a way to explain one of the headings in the table, which we did not change.

Graeme
March 23, 2017

One should also be aware that LICs use a number of different ways are used to report their performance to their shareholders. While all LICs publish monthly a pre and post tax NTA, that's where commonality ceases.

At the conservative end of the spectrum, some managers report performance as change in post tax NTA adjusted for dividends paid. This is in my opinion the best measure of the change in value of the long term shareholder’s investment. Other managers will adjust this for tax paid and/or fees paid. Still others will use a portfolio return, again possibly adjusted for fees and taxes. I was surprised that the one year portfolio return (before taxes and fees in the fine print) of over 15% reported by one manager, equated to only a 2% increase in the after tax NTA adjusted for dividends paid.

Portfolio return is undoubtedly a useful method for comparison against a benchmark index, though one has to ensure the benchmark is appropriate. Why one dedicated microcap manager would benchmark against the All-ords index (primarily large banks, miners and retailers) beats me.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

It’s time for LICs to die

Listed Investment Company deals for 2019

Latest LIC and ETF updates

Firstlinks is sponsored by:
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

Site Map

About Firstlinks

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.