Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Register

6 November 2026

Home / 195

Watch premiums and discounts in LICs

Independent Investment Research (IIR) has released its December Quarter 2016 review of the LIC sector, sometimes called Listed Managed Investments (LMI). A summary of the performance of the 34 LICs included in the Report is presented below. The full paper with more detailed coverage is available here. As this full review is of the previous quarter, investors should check latest prices which may have moved significantly.

Overall equities performance

For the December 2016 quarter, the S&P/ASX200 was up by 5.2% following the US market rally after Trump’s election. Large cap equities, and especially resources stocks, contributed most to this performance. Small caps, down 2.5% for the quarter, still managed an overall gain for the year of 13.2%. For the 12 months to December 2016, the S&P/ASX200 was up 11.8%.

LIC performance

IIR’s analysis uses two different measures. The first is total returns (share price gain or loss plus dividends) which represents the actual return received by shareholders from their investment. The second is pre-tax NTA plus dividends, which is better for evaluating manager performance.

Using this second metric, the best performing fund for the December quarter was Global Master Fund (ASX:GFL) with a 15.5% increase in portfolio value due to a strong share price performance of its core holding, Berkshire Hathaway. As the overall market performed well, so too did the majority of LICs included in the Review. However, some small cap LICs had negative returns.

If using the first metric, Westoz (ASX:WIC) was the best performer for the quarter with an 8.1% total return in share price and dividends due to its resources focus. This reduced the discount to pre-tax NTA from 16.8% at 30 September 2016 to 9.4% at 31 December 2016.

Premiums and discounts

As at 31 December 2016, 12 of the 34 LICs covered were trading at a premium to pre-tax NTA. The largest of these was Mirrabooka Investments (ASX:MIR) at 25.8%, followed by WAM Capital (ASX:WAM) and WAM Research (ASX:WAX), each at 20.7%.

At the other end of the scale, Global Master Fund (ASX:GFL) was trading at the largest discount to pre-tax NTA at 22.3%, widening from 15.8% as at 30 September 2016. Over the past three years, GFL’s discount has averaged 14.4%.

The table below shows the quarterly performance for each of the 34 funds as measured by both metrics mentioned above, along with their premium/discount to pre-tax NTA:

Leisa Bell is Assistant Editor at Cuffelinks.

  •   23 March 2017
  • 5
  •      
  •   
5 Comments
Ashley
March 22, 2017

The table describes returns in terms of “share price including dividends”. Is that different from ‘total returns’ which is a widely understood term? (or even “total returns including dividends”). Share price does not ‘include’ dividends. It should say ‘share price gain/loss plus dividends’, which is the same as total returns.

Sceptical
March 23, 2017

Its kind of pointless to even reference the movement in the NTA as the investor into the LIC structure never receives that performance. The assumption that is made is the share price will move according to the movement in the NTA. But the real performance the investor receives is just the performance in the share price (what they bought it for and then what they sell it for/what it is currently trading at) + dividends. The structure itself is flawed and surely will be replaced with active ETFs if more providers come to market to offer choice!

Cat Daddy
March 23, 2017

Ashley.

What part did I miss. The article under sub heading LIC performance reads "(share price gain or loss plus dividends)"

Graham Hand
March 23, 2017

Hi CD, good pick up but we changed the previous wording after receiving Ashley's comment. We left his comment after the article as a way to explain one of the headings in the table, which we did not change.

Graeme
March 23, 2017

One should also be aware that LICs use a number of different ways are used to report their performance to their shareholders. While all LICs publish monthly a pre and post tax NTA, that's where commonality ceases.

At the conservative end of the spectrum, some managers report performance as change in post tax NTA adjusted for dividends paid. This is in my opinion the best measure of the change in value of the long term shareholder’s investment. Other managers will adjust this for tax paid and/or fees paid. Still others will use a portfolio return, again possibly adjusted for fees and taxes. I was surprised that the one year portfolio return (before taxes and fees in the fine print) of over 15% reported by one manager, equated to only a 2% increase in the after tax NTA adjusted for dividends paid.

Portfolio return is undoubtedly a useful method for comparison against a benchmark index, though one has to ensure the benchmark is appropriate. Why one dedicated microcap manager would benchmark against the All-ords index (primarily large banks, miners and retailers) beats me.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

It’s time for LICs to die

Listed Investment Company deals for 2019

Latest LIC and ETF updates

Firstlinks is sponsored by:
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation’s structural failings

Politicians are fighting over access to super, but they may be arguing about the wrong thing. The system’s three fundamental flaws have been hiding in plain sight for decades, costing Australians far more than they realise.

Planning

The great wealth transfer myth

Why do some families preserve wealth for generations while others struggle to? As the great wealth transfer unfolds, the determining factor is often not the structure of the estate, but the preparation of those who will inherit it.

Investment strategies

What comes after bank hybrids?

For years, bank hybrids have been a cornerstone of portfolio income. With tens of billions of dollars now disappearing from the market, investors face a critical question: what comes next, and are the obvious replacements enough?

Investment insights from the US

What happens when knowledge becomes a commodity? The latest themes emerging from the US tech sector suggest AI could reshape company moats, disrupt incumbents and create winners and losers in unexpected places.

Investing

Can Berkshire thrive without Buffett?

Warren Buffett's departure marks the end of an era. But the more important question for investors is whether Berkshire's culture, discipline and capital allocation framework can survive without the man who built them.

Retirement

The Bengen 4% Rule: Lost in translation

For years, retirees have been told to focus on withdrawal rates. But the real question is far simpler: how many dollars can you safely spend? The answer may be very different from what conventional retirement wisdom suggests.

Interest rates

Super low interest rates came with side effects

For more than a decade, investors lived through an era of near-zero interest rates. With bond yields now surging, it's worth asking whether cheap money solved economic problems, or introduced a much larger set of risks.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

Site Map

About Firstlinks

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.