Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 209

Share investors should protect the downside

The possibility of rising interest rates, uncertainty about President Donald Trump’s policy directions, rapidly rising government debts and the risk of a ‘hard’ Brexit have given Australian stock investors plenty of worries in 2017. Added to this is the threat of an Australian housing bust, with UBS recently calling the top of the market.

How can investors, particularly those nearing retirement, protect themselves and their portfolios against such market volatility?

Unrealistic return expectations

The ASX Australian Investor Study 2017 revealed a disconnect between investor risk profiles and their return expectations, with 60% of retirees wanting ‘stable or guaranteed returns’, but an even higher 81% of younger investors seeking the same. Yet 21% of the most risk-averse investors still expect annual returns over 10%.

A December 2016 report by State Street Global Advisors predicted a long-term (10 years plus) return from global equities of only 6.2%, with just 1.3% from global government bonds, while US inflation is expected to average 2%.

For a typical balanced portfolio comprising 60% equities and 40% bonds, this equates to an after-inflation return of just 2.24%, which is insufficient for most investors’ investment objectives.

Added to this is the risk of a significant stock market downturn. Long-term US data shows a bear market occurs once every 3.5 years, with an average fall of 35%.

Another such plunge now, as seen during the GFC, would devastate the retirement savings of millions of Australians, with those nearing retirement and existing retirees not having the luxury of extra working decades to recoup such losses.

Property may not be a safe haven either, given that the Sydney and Melbourne residential property markets have been rated among the world’s most overpriced. Any crash in this sector would inflict further woes on a banking sector already reeling from the budget’s recent bank levy and increased capitalisation requirements.

Bank deposits, while protected by government guarantee up to certain limits, are not offering sufficient returns, given the current inflation rate. And while bond yields spiked on Trump’s election, yields have since eased back on concerns over whether Trump’s planned infrastructure spending and tax cuts will get through Congress (let alone if he is impeached).

Unfortunately, in the search for yield in the current low interest rate environment, as the GFC has slowly faded from investors’ minds, there has been a worrisome return to riskier growth assets by older investors, who should be seeking lower volatility investments.

Lower volatility solution

Combining a low-return investment, such as cash, with high-risk investments such as shares and property, does not necessarily produce a high overall risk-adjusted return, particularly since falling share prices can flow on to property prices if overall economic conditions deteriorate.

Many of the world’s leading investors, such as Yale University’s endowment fund, have pursued an alternative approach not heavily dominated by share market risk, such as in alternative investments, leading to Yale’s superior performance.

To guard against increasing volatility, investors should consider allocating part of their portfolio to a highly diversified ‘all-weather’ investment strategy, such as a market neutral fund. This has the ability to perform equally well in both rising and falling markets. It should have little or no net exposure to global equity markets, with an overarching focus on capital preservation, a high level of diversification, and little or no leverage, with the aim of producing a high risk-adjusted return.

The theory behind a market neutral investment is that rather than the risk and return being reliant upon the overall market’s movement, it is dependent instead on individual share selection, a risk that the investment manager has greater control over.

In a broad market crash such as seen during the GFC, even highly diversified portfolios of blue chip shares suffered substantial losses. As Warren Buffett famously said, “Only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.” Australian investors, particularly those in their 50s, simply cannot afford to be caught out in a market storm.

 

Glenn Rushton is Executive Director of Rushton Financial Services, and Investment Manager of the Rushton Conservative Global Market Neutral Fund and the Rushton Global Market Neutral Fund. In his other life, he is the trainer of boxer Jeff Horn who stunned the sporting world with his victory over the legendary Manny Pacquiao in front of a crowd of over 50,000 and a global television audience of millions.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirement is a risky business for most people

While encouraging people to draw down on their accumulated wealth in retirement might be good public policy, several million retirees disagree because they are purposefully conserving that capital. It’s time for a different approach.

The perfect portfolio for the next decade

This examines the performance of key asset classes and sub-sectors in 2024 and over longer timeframes, and the lessons that can be drawn for constructing an investment portfolio for the next decade.

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

The challenges with building a dividend portfolio

Getting regular, growing income from stocks is tougher with the dividend yield on the ASX nearing 25-year lows. Here are some conventional and not-so-conventional ideas for investors wanting to build a dividend portfolio.

How much do you need to retire?

Australians are used to hearing dire warnings that they don't have enough saved for a comfortable retirement. Yet most people need to save a lot less than you might think — as long as they meet an important condition.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 594 with weekend update

It’s well documented that many retirees draw down the minimum amount required and die with much of their super balances untouched. This explores the reasons why and some potential solutions to address the issue.

  • 16 January 2025

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

9 ways to fix Australia's housing crisis

Decades of policy failure have induced a fall in housing affordability. Unless painful changes are made, an underclass will emerge in a society that is supposed to boast the one of the world's highest standards of living.

Shares

Australia: why the chase for even higher dividend yields?

Australia boasts one of the world's highest dividend yielding sharemarkets, providing substantial benefits to investors and retirees. Despite this, individuals often stretch for even more yield, to their detriment.

Shares

MIGA – Make Income Great Again

The Australian sharemarket seems to be rewarding a number of unprofitable companies on the promise of future riches. Yet profits and cashflows still matter, as a recent case study of Domino's Pizza shows.

Shares

Mapping future US market returns

Exceptional returns from the US sharemarket over the past decade have driven by sales growth, margin expansion, rising valuations, and dividends. Predicting future returns requires careful consideration of these factors.

Shares

Read this before you go all in on US equities

US equities rule global markets, but history is littered with examples of markets that seemed invincible — until they weren’t. Diversification will be key for investor portfolios going forwards.

Property

What impact would scrapping stamp duty have on housing?

Increasing house prices pose challenges for housing affordability. This investigates the impact of stamp duty on the property market, and how removing the tax could help address several key issues.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.