Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 209

Share investors should protect the downside

The possibility of rising interest rates, uncertainty about President Donald Trump’s policy directions, rapidly rising government debts and the risk of a ‘hard’ Brexit have given Australian stock investors plenty of worries in 2017. Added to this is the threat of an Australian housing bust, with UBS recently calling the top of the market.

How can investors, particularly those nearing retirement, protect themselves and their portfolios against such market volatility?

Unrealistic return expectations

The ASX Australian Investor Study 2017 revealed a disconnect between investor risk profiles and their return expectations, with 60% of retirees wanting ‘stable or guaranteed returns’, but an even higher 81% of younger investors seeking the same. Yet 21% of the most risk-averse investors still expect annual returns over 10%.

A December 2016 report by State Street Global Advisors predicted a long-term (10 years plus) return from global equities of only 6.2%, with just 1.3% from global government bonds, while US inflation is expected to average 2%.

For a typical balanced portfolio comprising 60% equities and 40% bonds, this equates to an after-inflation return of just 2.24%, which is insufficient for most investors’ investment objectives.

Added to this is the risk of a significant stock market downturn. Long-term US data shows a bear market occurs once every 3.5 years, with an average fall of 35%.

Another such plunge now, as seen during the GFC, would devastate the retirement savings of millions of Australians, with those nearing retirement and existing retirees not having the luxury of extra working decades to recoup such losses.

Property may not be a safe haven either, given that the Sydney and Melbourne residential property markets have been rated among the world’s most overpriced. Any crash in this sector would inflict further woes on a banking sector already reeling from the budget’s recent bank levy and increased capitalisation requirements.

Bank deposits, while protected by government guarantee up to certain limits, are not offering sufficient returns, given the current inflation rate. And while bond yields spiked on Trump’s election, yields have since eased back on concerns over whether Trump’s planned infrastructure spending and tax cuts will get through Congress (let alone if he is impeached).

Unfortunately, in the search for yield in the current low interest rate environment, as the GFC has slowly faded from investors’ minds, there has been a worrisome return to riskier growth assets by older investors, who should be seeking lower volatility investments.

Lower volatility solution

Combining a low-return investment, such as cash, with high-risk investments such as shares and property, does not necessarily produce a high overall risk-adjusted return, particularly since falling share prices can flow on to property prices if overall economic conditions deteriorate.

Many of the world’s leading investors, such as Yale University’s endowment fund, have pursued an alternative approach not heavily dominated by share market risk, such as in alternative investments, leading to Yale’s superior performance.

To guard against increasing volatility, investors should consider allocating part of their portfolio to a highly diversified ‘all-weather’ investment strategy, such as a market neutral fund. This has the ability to perform equally well in both rising and falling markets. It should have little or no net exposure to global equity markets, with an overarching focus on capital preservation, a high level of diversification, and little or no leverage, with the aim of producing a high risk-adjusted return.

The theory behind a market neutral investment is that rather than the risk and return being reliant upon the overall market’s movement, it is dependent instead on individual share selection, a risk that the investment manager has greater control over.

In a broad market crash such as seen during the GFC, even highly diversified portfolios of blue chip shares suffered substantial losses. As Warren Buffett famously said, “Only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.” Australian investors, particularly those in their 50s, simply cannot afford to be caught out in a market storm.

 

Glenn Rushton is Executive Director of Rushton Financial Services, and Investment Manager of the Rushton Conservative Global Market Neutral Fund and the Rushton Global Market Neutral Fund. In his other life, he is the trainer of boxer Jeff Horn who stunned the sporting world with his victory over the legendary Manny Pacquiao in front of a crowd of over 50,000 and a global television audience of millions.

 

  •   6 July 2017
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Noel Whittaker’s take on the budget

Marketed as a fix for inequality and housing affordability, the latest budget instead delivers a tangle of tax changes that leave everyday Australians worse off.

Australia has no death duties. Technically.

Australia may not levy formal death duties, but a growing web of tax measures is quietly shaping what wealth passes between generations. Now, the 2026 budget adds another layer.

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Back to the future - Why indexing CGT is a good idea

A return to indexation of capital gains would be a fairer way to compensate households for the effects of inflation than the current discount. Importantly, it opens the door to future, broader reforms to stop the taxation of inflation.

The investment mistake killing your returns

Retail investors face an increasingly complex product environment, but simplicity may be the most overlooked advantage in building a portfolio you can actually live with.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Choose your hedges wisely… and often

A new market regime is exposing the fragility of static hedges. With correlations shifting and safe havens flipping, investors must rethink diversification and adopt more adaptive tools to protect capital.

Investment strategies

Yields take centre stage again

The Australian credit landscape is shifting. Yields are rising, issuance is strong and spreads continue to tighten. Income is re‑emerging as the dominant driver of returns, though pockets of risk may be building beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The grass is always greener: Rethinking Australian vs global equities

Australia's once‑dominant sharemarket is losing ground as others surge ahead, prompting investors to question home‑bias instincts. Meanwhile, the US market appears attractive. Is it time to revisit your global equity allocation?

Investment strategies

Stop asking if there's a stock market bubble. Ask this instead.

Markets continue to push onwards despite valuations looking stretched by historical standards. Bubble talk is rampant, however investors may be focusing on the wrong thing. The real story sits deeper than the headlines.

Taxation

The GST cannot stop inflation

Raising the GST when inflation jumps sounds clever on paper, until we examine how it may play out in practice. What is pitched as a simple inflation fix can lead to a sharp turn in the wrong direction for prices.

Shares

Why SpaceX is coming to your super fund

SpaceX’s blockbuster debut is grabbing headlines, but the real story for Australian investors is much quieter. Giant listings eventually filter into super funds and ETFs, subtly reshaping portfolios long before most realise.

Taxation

Is the government being honest with us about its business CGT changes?

The government’s assurances on small‑business concessions don’t withstand the scrutiny. Token carve‑outs and a lack of credible rationale for CGT changes may reshape how Australia rewards long‑term value creation. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.