Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 209

Share investors should protect the downside

The possibility of rising interest rates, uncertainty about President Donald Trump’s policy directions, rapidly rising government debts and the risk of a ‘hard’ Brexit have given Australian stock investors plenty of worries in 2017. Added to this is the threat of an Australian housing bust, with UBS recently calling the top of the market.

How can investors, particularly those nearing retirement, protect themselves and their portfolios against such market volatility?

Unrealistic return expectations

The ASX Australian Investor Study 2017 revealed a disconnect between investor risk profiles and their return expectations, with 60% of retirees wanting ‘stable or guaranteed returns’, but an even higher 81% of younger investors seeking the same. Yet 21% of the most risk-averse investors still expect annual returns over 10%.

A December 2016 report by State Street Global Advisors predicted a long-term (10 years plus) return from global equities of only 6.2%, with just 1.3% from global government bonds, while US inflation is expected to average 2%.

For a typical balanced portfolio comprising 60% equities and 40% bonds, this equates to an after-inflation return of just 2.24%, which is insufficient for most investors’ investment objectives.

Added to this is the risk of a significant stock market downturn. Long-term US data shows a bear market occurs once every 3.5 years, with an average fall of 35%.

Another such plunge now, as seen during the GFC, would devastate the retirement savings of millions of Australians, with those nearing retirement and existing retirees not having the luxury of extra working decades to recoup such losses.

Property may not be a safe haven either, given that the Sydney and Melbourne residential property markets have been rated among the world’s most overpriced. Any crash in this sector would inflict further woes on a banking sector already reeling from the budget’s recent bank levy and increased capitalisation requirements.

Bank deposits, while protected by government guarantee up to certain limits, are not offering sufficient returns, given the current inflation rate. And while bond yields spiked on Trump’s election, yields have since eased back on concerns over whether Trump’s planned infrastructure spending and tax cuts will get through Congress (let alone if he is impeached).

Unfortunately, in the search for yield in the current low interest rate environment, as the GFC has slowly faded from investors’ minds, there has been a worrisome return to riskier growth assets by older investors, who should be seeking lower volatility investments.

Lower volatility solution

Combining a low-return investment, such as cash, with high-risk investments such as shares and property, does not necessarily produce a high overall risk-adjusted return, particularly since falling share prices can flow on to property prices if overall economic conditions deteriorate.

Many of the world’s leading investors, such as Yale University’s endowment fund, have pursued an alternative approach not heavily dominated by share market risk, such as in alternative investments, leading to Yale’s superior performance.

To guard against increasing volatility, investors should consider allocating part of their portfolio to a highly diversified ‘all-weather’ investment strategy, such as a market neutral fund. This has the ability to perform equally well in both rising and falling markets. It should have little or no net exposure to global equity markets, with an overarching focus on capital preservation, a high level of diversification, and little or no leverage, with the aim of producing a high risk-adjusted return.

The theory behind a market neutral investment is that rather than the risk and return being reliant upon the overall market’s movement, it is dependent instead on individual share selection, a risk that the investment manager has greater control over.

In a broad market crash such as seen during the GFC, even highly diversified portfolios of blue chip shares suffered substantial losses. As Warren Buffett famously said, “Only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.” Australian investors, particularly those in their 50s, simply cannot afford to be caught out in a market storm.

 

Glenn Rushton is Executive Director of Rushton Financial Services, and Investment Manager of the Rushton Conservative Global Market Neutral Fund and the Rushton Global Market Neutral Fund. In his other life, he is the trainer of boxer Jeff Horn who stunned the sporting world with his victory over the legendary Manny Pacquiao in front of a crowd of over 50,000 and a global television audience of millions.

 

  •   6 July 2017
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.