Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 499

Why are SMSFs holding so much cash?

There’s a lingering statistic across Australia’s legion of 600,000 self-managed superannuation funds.

Collectively, SMSFs have about $890 billion invested into different assets on behalf of roughly 1.1 million people, according to the most recent Australian Tax Office (ATO) quarterly data.

But a more interesting number to look out for in the ATO data is the total amount that SMSFs still have allocated to low-yielding cash and term deposits.

Over the last decade it’s been hovering around the $140 billion mark, at times surpassing 20% of total SMSF assets under management.

The pros and cons of cash

Why many SMSF trustees choose to hold large amounts of cash is understandable, to an extent.

There is a common misconception that cash is a risk-free asset. It’s not prone to daily market volatility like shares are. It’s also liquid – you can generally get your hands on it quickly and easily.

Furthermore, cash savings up to $250,000 per account holder (including SMSF trustees) on deposit with an Australian authorised deposit-taking institution are guaranteed by the Commonwealth in the event the institution fails.

For self-funded retirees using an SMSF, holding cash enables quick withdrawals to fund everyday life in retirement.

Yet, cash does have inherent investment risks. Firstly, a decade of record-low interest rates has meant that cash as an asset class has delivered an average annualised income return of just 1.9% since 2012.

That’s lower than any other major asset class. Worse still, after taking high inflation levels into account, real cash returns have been negative for some time.

Bond inflows on the rise

What’s startling in the ATO’s latest SMSF asset allocation statistics is the low amount of money trustees have invested directly in fixed income debt securities (namely investment grade bonds).

It’s only about $10.5 billion in total, less than one-tenth of the amount invested in cash.

While the actual number is probably somewhat higher, considering that it is likely some SMSFs have invested in bonds indirectly via bond exchange-traded funds (ETFs), unlisted bond funds, and diversified funds that hold both equities and bonds, it is still surprisingly low given the superior risk-adjusted returns potentially available from fixed income.

Bonds are securities issued by governments or companies that they use to borrow money, and the investor buying the bond can expect to receive full repayment of their principal if they hold it until maturity as well as steady regular interest payments until then.

As such, bonds are considered a lower-risk type of investment than shares which can’t offer any expectations to investors of either full repayment or a steady income stream and which are usually more prone to market volatility.

Likewise, being slightly higher risk than cash, bonds are generally expected to outperform cash over the long term.

What’s clear is that a growing number of investors worldwide are liquidating their cash in order to take advantage of higher-returning, relatively low-risk, high-grade bonds, especially government-issued bonds.

That’s showing up in a range of other data, including statistics from the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) covering monthly inflows into ASX-listed ETFs that invest in Australian and international bond issues.

In the latter half of 2022 investment inflows into bond ETFs ($2.2 billion) exceeded the inflows into Australian shares ETFs ($1.6 billion) – that’s rare.

What’s behind the heavy bond inflows?

There are three major factors underway that have led to the increased, and accelerating, inflows into bond products around the world.

1. Higher interest rates

To counter surging inflation, central banks around the world have rapidly increased official interest rates to quell consumer demand.

As official interest rates rise, so do the yields available to bond investors on new and existing bond issues. That obviously makes bonds more attractive to investors seeking higher steady income streams.

The higher income payments now available from bonds are expected over time to partially (if not fully) offset the bond price declines that occurred in 2022.

In 2023, Vanguard’s return expectations for fixed income have significantly increased compared to a year ago.

We forecast global bonds to return 3.9-4.9 per cent and domestic bonds to return 3.7-4.7 per cent over the next decade – a 2 percentage point increase on the 10-year forecasts we made a year ago.

The prospect of higher returns underscores the increased demand for fixed income from investors, and this demand is only expected to grow over the short-to-medium term.

2. Higher capital growth

Bond prices typically move inversely to interest rates, which means that as bond yields have increased, bond prices have fallen.

That’s made bonds cheaper to buy on the market than when yields were at ultra-low levels.

Bond investors can expect this to change over time, because once inflation levels fall it’s likely that central banks will start to reduce official interest rates.

For bondholders (whether they hold bonds directly or indirectly), lower interest rates will likely ultimately translate to higher bond trading prices, which will likely result in capital appreciation on their investment over time.

This is another key attraction for fixed income investors with a longer-term horizon.

3. Improved portfolio diversification

Lastly, it’s important to look at the traditional role of bonds in investment portfolios, which is to provide asset class diversification to help smooth out total investment returns over time.

There are strong diversification benefits to investors who hold both shares and bonds in their portfolios over longer periods.

For example, Vanguard analysis shows the average annualised return from a 60/40 portfolio split between Australian equities and bonds over a 23-year period from 2000 to 2023 has been only slightly lower (around 1%), and with notably lower volatility, than an all-Australian equities portfolio.

Meanwhile, fixed income has consistently outperformed cash.

Source: Vanguard

While bonds do not outperform riskier asset classes such as shares over the long run, they typically have a more stable return profile because they are not prone to the same level of market volatility.

You can see this by comparing the orange line in the chart above (fixed income) to the blue line (equities).

Historical returns across a 23-year period show that bonds can deliver income, capital returns and diversification benefits at a manageable cost to total portfolio returns.

This underscores the worth of well-balanced portfolios, no matter the market conditions.

The key takeaway for investors from this data is that sticking with a diversified asset allocation covering fixed income and equities is a sound long-term investment strategy.

So, expect to see more portfolio rebalancing as investors capitalise on higher interest rates, lower bond prices, and the potential price upside from share markets.

This may see a reduction in the high amount of cash currently being held by SMSF trustees operating through a trust deed that authorises investments in bonds.

 

Jean Bauler is Head of Fixed Income at Vanguard Asia-Pacific, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only. Vanguard has not taken your objectives, financial situation or needs into account when preparing this article so it may not be applicable to the particular situation you are considering.

For more articles and papers from Vanguard Investments Australia, please click here.

 

19 Comments
Danny
March 13, 2023

For the past few years we have been able to draw a lot less from our ABP funds. But this coming financial year marks the return to normality , i.e 4 to 5% or higher, rather than the 50% discount regime we have enjoyed. It's been tempting to invest more into markets during dips over this period , but now we have to ensure there's enough cash holdings to cover future drawdowns. If asset allocations have not been secured, some SMSF trustees may need to sell assets to top up those cash reserves. And of course, the surplus income about to accrue can be redirected into non super assets....or given to the kids!!

Steve
March 13, 2023

Because this "cash" is earning between 5.65% and 9.8% (after fees) in first mortgages. Better than the disaster achieved by the Industry Super funds last year. Secondly, it is waiting for the train wreck of cheap assets that the Central Banks are currently engineering through their insane level of interest rate rises, which like 2007, were far too high & too fast. This Central Bank routine is starting to be come a little tiring, against an economic backdrop of mass immigrations & minimal effort to house people. Poor people having to suffer a 1% rental vacancy rate is an absolute disgrace. This failure to get people into cost-affordable houses will not end well politically.

SMSF Trustee
March 15, 2023

Steve that is not cash! Either in reality nor in the statistics.

pang
March 12, 2023

Regarding "
Furthermore, cash savings up to $250,000 per account holder (including SMSF trustees) on deposit with an Australian authorised deposit-taking institution are guaranteed by the Commonwealth in the event the institution fails. ", if I have an individual account, sole director Pty Ltd account, sole member SMSF account say with NAB, would each of these 3 accounts be guaranteed by Commonwealth up to $250K , or regardless of the number of accounts ( the 'owner' of accounts is the same same person ) , all combined 3 accounts are guaranteed to $250K.

Ruth
March 15, 2023

The $250 000 'guarantee' covers SMSFs as the trustee can open accounts with >1 institution. It does not cover industry funds; they are not on the list of approved institutions, and even if they were they would hold one account for many thousands of clients (i.e. the 'cash' held by the fund is not in the individual's name). I am surprised the industry funds did not seek that guarantee. Does anyone know why?

Kerrie
March 12, 2023

It answer us simple. Once in pension mode very few SMSF have inflows from working only dividends. So a well managed SMSF will have about 4 years pension payments in cash. You don't want to sell undervalued assets to meet these pension payments.

Dauf
March 11, 2023

They have more reason to have cash than LICs etc (pay for living expenses)…so makes sense to me

John
March 10, 2023

I will reply to Edward - my response is why do you treat all your investments as capital? You draw down on cash to fund lifestyle when markets are down so you don't have to sell. Why would you sell in the first place? if you have a properly structured portfolio that provides sufficient income (i.e. with higher income bonds vs low return cash) then you wouldn't have to draw down on any capital (cash or shares) to fund your lifestyle. Your answer tells me that like the majority of Australians you simply do not understand how to properly construct a portfolio appropriate to your stage of life, i.e. needing income rather than speculating constantly on capital returns.

Dudley
March 10, 2023

"wouldn't have to draw down on any capital (cash or shares) to fund":

All income / expenditure is capitalised ('balance' changes) the moment it is received / paid. All withdrawals are of capital, including income tax payments and personal expenses.

John
March 10, 2023

Dudley there is capital which is put at risk to attempt to generate an increase in value vs income which is spent on lifestyle. Excess income can be converted to capital. The difference is clear.

Dudley
March 10, 2023

. "there is capital which is put at risk to attempt to generate an increase in value"
. "income which is spent on lifestyle"
"The difference is clear.":

No difference that I can discern. Artificial line between recently received income as being allocated to LyfeStyle and equal amount of capital that existed prior to said recent income.

Mrs Hart
March 10, 2023

Statistics are only a snap shot of a specific point in time! Rollovers, contributions at end of financial year will increase cash holdings plus cash from realisations as portfolios are adjusted, capital gains managed. Then there is liquidity. Cash is needed to fund pension payments and fund liabilities.

Barry
March 12, 2023

Exactly. Those statistics only show one day of the year, which is 30th June. What about the other 364 days? We have absolutely no knowledge of what the cash levels are on those other days. Many SMSFs convert various assets into cash just before the 30th of June to avoid uncomfortable questions from the auditor about the valuation of those assets and then just reinvest into those assets on July 1, so I would treat any official statistics with a grain of salt, and consider the cash levels reported on 30th of June to be much higher than they are on other days of the year because of these incentives to look good in front of the auditor.

CE
March 10, 2023

Could someone enlighten me, please. Please refer ‘The pros and cons of cash’ above where we note - ‘ cash savings up to $250,000 per account holder (including SMSF trustees) on deposit with an Australian authorised deposit-taking institution are guaranteed by the Commonwealth in the event the institution fails.’ I understood the ‘big’ 4 or 5 banks provided this guarantee - would $250,000 invested in ?? cash within a managed super fund have this guarantee also?

Edward
March 10, 2023

I'll explain why so many SMSFs hold cash, I am one of them. Many, perhaps most, know very well what we do. It is not a case of misconceptions. Given that most of these balances are held by retirees, this is why: 1. A prudent person keeps between 2 and 3 years of living expenses in cash, in order to ride out negative investment cycles without having to sell . We are in one of those cycles. As a percentage, the cash portion will of course increase further when the market is down. 2. Many experienced investors will increase their cash holdings when they believe they are at the beginning of a down cycle, to reinvest when the market goes up again. Yes, I know you can't time the market, at least not perfectly, but this strategy works - sometimes. Holding bonds in either of the above situations is not a very good idea.....

Sue
March 12, 2023

Yes that’s exactly why I hold cash in my SMSF!

Tony
March 09, 2023

You’re missing one key issue, most SMSF “investors” have shares, bonds and cash. They don’t have airports, pipelines, commercial and industrial property, private equity, international listed shares, ports, toll roads and the worlds best fund managers working for them. That’s why they deliver poor returns compared to the giants like ART, Australian Super and similar funds. If you want a stress free retirement, just close down your SMSF, give it to the experts, and enjoy your overseas holidays with your monthly pension payment!

Dudley
March 09, 2023

When retiree's cost of living and entertainment is less than age pension then the amount of capital needs only to be enough to equal post-retirement age care refundable accommodation deposit (RAD) (eg value of home). Excess capital is a toy; invested for high stakes thrills or to park and forget, ..., as a 'security blanket', or lavish on pet persons or projects.

Even were (7.8%) inflation to remain greater than (4%) government guaranteed bank deposits, with withdrawals less than returns in combined personal & super funds and couple starting with a modest $1.6M at 67, death of the retirees will occur before capital is exhausted.

More likely than not interest rates will exceed inflation after and for a while.

No need to fuss so at a minimum cash and near equivalents are good enough.

John
March 09, 2023

I agree with Edward. The ATO’s SMSF asset allocation statistics are just that: statistics about SMSF holdings. People typically hold assets in places other than an SMSF, so these stats tell the reader nothing about the true proportion or distribution of cash holdings. My cash holdings are higher than it would appear from my SMSF tax return, because I can't put more in and choose to keep most cash outside super in various bank accounts and TDs, both on and offshore, while focussing on 100% franked dividends inside tax free super ABPs.

 

Leave a Comment:


RELATED ARTICLES

Why allocating more to fixed income now makes sense

Which asset classes are undervalued right now?

Cash underperforms when rates peak

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Vale Graham Hand

It’s with heavy hearts that we announce Firstlinks’ co-founder and former Managing Editor, Graham Hand, has died aged 66. Graham was a legendary figure in the finance industry and here are three tributes to him.

The nuts and bolts of family trusts

There are well over 800,000 family trusts in Australia, controlling more than $3 trillion of assets. Here's a guide on whether a family trust may have a place in your individual investment strategy.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 583 with weekend update

Investing guru Howard Marks says he had two epiphanies while visiting Australia recently: the two major asset classes aren’t what you think they are, and one key decision matters above all else when building portfolios.

  • 24 October 2024

Warren Buffett is preparing for a bear market. Should you?

Berkshire Hathaway’s third quarter earnings update reveals Buffett is selling stocks and building record cash reserves. Here’s a look at his track record in calling market tops and whether you should follow his lead and dial down risk.

Preserving wealth through generations is hard

How have so many wealthy families through history managed to squander their fortunes? This looks at the lessons from these families and offers several solutions to making and keeping money over the long-term.

A big win for bank customers against scammers

A recent ruling from The Australian Financial Complaints Authority may herald a new era for financial scams. For the first time, a bank is being forced to reimburse a customer for the amount they were scammed.

Latest Updates

Shares

Looking beyond banks for dividend income

The Big Four banks have had an extraordinary run and it’s left income investors with a conundrum: to stick with them even though they now offer relatively low dividend yields and limited growth prospects or to look elsewhere.

Exchange traded products

AFIC on its record discount, passive investing and pricey stocks

A triple headwind has seen Australia's biggest LIC swing to a 10% discount and scuppered its relative performance. Management was bullish in an interview with Firstlinks, but is the discount ever likely to close?

Superannuation

Hidden fees are a super problem

Most Australians don’t realise they are being charged up to six different types of fees on their superannuation. These fees can be opaque and hard to compare across different funds and investment options.

Shares

ASX large cap outlook for 2025

Economic growth in Australia looks to have bottomed, which means it makes sense to selectively add to cyclical exposures on the ASX in addition to key thematics like decarbonisation and technological change.

Property

Taking advantage of the property cycle

Understanding the property cycle can be a useful tool to make informed decisions and stay focused on long-term goals. This looks at where we are in the commercial property cycle and the potential opportunities for investors.

Investment strategies

Is this bedrock of financial theory a mirage?

The concept of an 'equity risk premium' has driven asset allocation decisions for decades. A revamped study suggests it was a relatively short-lived phenomenon rather than the mainstay many thought.

Vale Graham Hand

It’s with heavy hearts that we announce Firstlinks’ co-founder and former Managing Editor, Graham Hand, has died aged 66. Graham was a legendary figure in the finance industry and here are three tributes to him.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.