In recent years, fund managers have received a lot of bad press for their performance versus benchmark indices. In an editorial in October, I wrote of S&P Global’s new SPIVA report, which showed Australian fund managers performed better in the first half of the year, with most outperforming indices in local equities, small and mid-caps, and bonds. But their results were less impressive over longer periods.
Active vs passive
In a new report, Morningstar has measured fund managers’ success relative to the net-of-fee performance of comparable passive funds, rather than an index. And it turns out that active managers stack up pretty well.
The study spanned more than 800 open-ended fund strategies across nine different categories. It found that the top quartile performers in every category have generated positive excess returns over their passive counterparts in the trailing 10-year period.
Some categories of fund managers did better than others. In the prominent ‘Australia Large Blend’ category, active funds performed worse over the past 10 years, better over five years, and were evenly split in the prior three years. Put simply, large cap managers have had periods of outperformance and underperformance.
Mid and small cap managers fared better. They performed in line with passive funds over three years, but significantly outperformed over longer periods. And, most of these managers beat passive across every timeframe.
This would suggest that there’s value in managers who can find pricing discrepancies in relatively under-researched mid and small caps.
Similarly, Australian equity income has been a favourable area for active managers. They’ve had excess returns across all timeframes.
Most dividend-focused passive funds have strict rule-based mandates. It seems that active funds with more flexibility can generate significant outperformance in this space.
Investing overseas has been more of a problem for Australian equity managers. In the ‘World Large Blend’ equity category, passive dominates active funds. Undoubtedly, increasing market concentration, aka ‘The Magnificent Seven’, has made it more difficult for active managers to keep up with the performance of comparable passive funds.
In fixed income, fund managers have added value both in Australian and global bonds. In local bonds, most managers have beaten passive counterparts over three, five and 10 years. Excess returns have been more positive in recent years with the normalization of the yield curve.
Managed fund fees are a key predictor of future returns
In a separate report, Morningstar has updated previous work which showed that fees were a reliable predictor of the future success of a fund.
The report confirms that lower-cost funds in Australia have a greater chance of outperforming their more expensive peers, as the chart below indicates.
In four out of five categories, the cheapest quintile of funds, both managed and passive, produced better results than the priciest quintile over the trailing five years.
Breaking that down further, in Global Large-Cap Equity, 68% of the funds in the lower quintile of fees outperformed their category group. These funds had average expense ratios of 0.46%. And their average annualized total return was 11.73% in the five years to June 30, 2024.
That compares to funds in the highest quintile of fees, where only 23% beat the category group, with average annualised returns of 8.05%, and expense ratios of 2.58% being a key drag on performance.
In Australian mid and small cap equity, fees weren’t as big a factor in overall results. The success ratio of the cheapest and priciest quintile was equal at 28%. Perhaps this suggests cheaper isn’t better when it comes to selecting small cap managers, and it may be worth paying up for good ones.
Fees were a larger factor for fixed income managers. Yet the spread between the cheapest quintile’s success ratio and the most expensive was smaller than for other asset classes. The cheapest quintile’s success ratio of 38% compared to the 14% of the priciest quintile.
The report says that active managers in fixed income tend to underperform indices in risk-off conditions while outperforming in more sanguine markets. That’s because the managers tend to overweight corporate credit relative to the index, where conventional benchmarks have a considerable skew to government and government-related bond issuance. The report goes on to suggest that “although active fixed income managers are often able to outperform the index gross of fees, the outperformance does not always compensate for the corresponding fees.”
The largest disparity between the cheapest and priciest quintile of fund managers was in the multisector growth category. Here, the cheapest quintile recorded a success ratio of 80% compared to the most expensive quintile’s 5%. The dispersion in fees was comparable to other asset classes with the cheapest charging an average 0.56% compared to the dearest’s 2.53%.
In sum, cost is a big predictor of managed fund returns and should be a key consideration for investors.
----
Thanks to the relentless rise of the tech giants, America now accounts for a record high 66% of the MSCI world equity index. My article this week exmaines who America came to dwarf other markets, and what could change to slow or halt its momentum.
James Gruber
Also in this week's edition...
Housing affordability is likely to take centre stage as we head towards the next federal election. The Coalition has copped a lot of flak for its super for housing plan but Noel Whittaker thinks it has a lot of merit, albeit it's missing one key feature that could be a game-changer.
The transfer of wealth between generations is a pressing issue in Australia, with an estimated $3.5 trillion expected to be passed down from those aged 60 and over in the next 20 years. Peter Nevill presents a case study highlighting some of the challenges and opportunities with this shift in intergenerational wealth.
A new survey from The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia suggests that most people aged 50 or over don't intend to stop work completely when they reach retirement age. And a significant proportion of those who delay retirement do so for non-financial reasons.
The relentless strength of the US dollar should be getting much more attention than it currently is, Clime's John Abernethy thinks. He says it shows that the US economy is excessively calling upon and draining the developed world’s capital. That's bad news for countries outside of America, including for Australia.
Gold has had a minor pullback after a ripping run this year. The rise in the yellow metal's price has happened despite a surge in the US dollar and fall in global inflation. So, what has driven the price over the past year or two, and what could happen next? The World Gold Council's John Reade gives us his insights.
A growing trend in recent years has been for experienced employees to develop what is known as a 'patchwork career', where they take on a number of roles, including consultancy work, as part of their transition to retirement. While it can be an attractive option, Peter Bembrick says there are some traps to be aware of, particularly when it comes to tax.
Lastly in this week's whitepaper, First Sentier explains how US utilities are ahead of the curve on decarbonisation and well on their way to achieiving net zero emissions.
Curated by James Gruber and Leisa Bell
A full PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles will be loaded into this editorial on our website by midday.
Latest updates
PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter
ETF Quarterly Report from Vanguard
ASX Listed Bond and Hybrid rate sheet from NAB/nabtrade
Listed Investment Company (LIC) Indicative NTA Report from Bell Potter
LIC (LMI) Monthly Review from Independent Investment Research
Monthly Investment Products update from ASX
Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website