Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 576

This cornerstone of stock market valuation has been left behind

The Cyclically Adjusted Price to Earnings (CAPE) ratio, introduced by Nobel laureate Robert Shiller in 1988, has long been a cornerstone of market valuation metrics. 

By smoothing earnings over a decade, it aims to provide a more stable, long-term perspective on market valuations. However, the CAPE ratio’s limitations have become increasingly apparent, making it a potentially misleading tool, especially when used in isolation for valuing today’s dynamic markets.

Understanding the CAPE Ratio

The CAPE ratio is calculated by dividing the current market price of a stock or index by the average of inflation-adjusted earnings over the past ten years.

CAPE Ratio = Current Market Price / Average Inflation-adjusted Earnings of the Last 10 Years

This approach aims to normalize earnings over a full business cycle, reducing the impact of temporary factors that can distort traditional P/E ratios.

CAPE’s track record: A history of underestimation

Since its introduction in 1988, the CAPE ratio has consistently projected U.S. equity returns 5-10% (or more) below realized returns over various periods. Except for the tumultuous period from the dot-com bubble to the global financial crisis, following CAPE for allocation decisions would likely have led investors into 1) the wrong asset class, 2) the wrong countries, and 3) the wrong sectors.


Source: Aptus via Yale.edu

Below are three critical issues with the CAPE Ratio.

Issue 1: Static stock composition myth

The CAPE ratio assumes a constant mix of stocks over time, which fails spectacularly in today’s dynamic U.S. market. High-growth tech companies such as Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Google, Meta, and Amazon now dominate the index, with dramatically increased earnings and market weights over the past decade.

For example, the following table shows market weights of a handful of technology companies from ten years ago vs today.


Source: Aptus via Morningstar Data

This leads to a logically inconsistent valuation:

  • Price (numerator): Reflects current market cap that reflects their much larger present earnings
  • Earnings (denominator): Includes smaller weights and much lower earnings from up to a decade ago

Take NVIDIA as an example: The price component accounts for its current ~7% weight in the index that reflects its 6350% earnings growth that has taken place over the past decade. Yet the earnings component includes its tiny 0.06% weight and much smaller earnings from a decade ago.

This mismatch creates a distorted picture of what an investor is actually buying. It would only be logical if one expected these companies’ earnings to plummet by over 90%—an extremely unlikely scenario for established market leaders.


Source: Aptus via Morningstar Data

Issue 2: The buyback blind spot

The CAPE ratio fails to account for share buybacks, a key method companies use to return capital to shareholders. Unlike dividends, buybacks reduce the share count, increasing Earnings Per Share (EPS) even without a change in corporate earnings.

Consider two identical companies, differing only in capital return method:

  • Company A: Returns capital via dividends
  • Company B: Returns capital via buybacks

Assumptions for both companies are they have the same earnings, initial share prices, P/E ratios, business results, and policies of returning 100% of earnings to investors:

  • Constant 10x P/E ratio
  • 0% real EPS growth
  • 10% return (earnings of $1 per $10 share price)
  • 100% of earnings returned to investors

Over time this means:

  • Company A: $10 share price, 10% dividend yield
  • Company B: 10% annual reduction in shares, 10% increase in EPS and share price

Despite the identical businesses, the CAPE calculation shows company A with a CAPE of 10x and company B with a CAPE of 15.4x. This issue is particularly relevant in today’s US market, where buybacks are more prevalent than in the past. As a result, the current market’s CAPE ratio may not be directly comparable to its own history or to markets where buybacks are less common.


*Conceptual Illustration via Aptus

Issue 3: CAPE’s cross-market incompatibility

CAPE often paints U.S. stocks as more expensive than foreign markets. Direct comparisons between countries using CAPE ignore fundamental differences between markets. US companies are much more likely to buy back their stock than foreign companies and the U.S. market has experienced substantial earnings growth, unlike many foreign markets.

  • For a market with 0% EPS growth, the CAPE ratio remains constant.
  • For a market with 10% EPS growth, the CAPE ratio increases significantly over time, even if the trailing P/E remains the same.
  • Conversely, for a market with -2.5% EPS growth, the CAPE ratio decreases, even if the trailing P/E remains the same.


*Conceptual Illustration via Aptus

The U.S. market’s higher CAPE ratio often reflects higher EPS growth, not necessarily overvaluation.

Moving beyond CAPE

While historically significant, CAPE has become an increasingly flawed standalone valuation tool, particularly for the dynamic U.S. market. Its failure to account for changing stock composition, buybacks’ impact on EPS, and varying growth rates across sectors and markets can lead to misleading conclusions.

For modern investors, a more nuanced approach is essential. This should incorporate:

  • Multiple valuation metrics beyond CAPE
  • Analysis of sector-specific growth trends
  • Consideration of capital return strategies (dividends vs. buybacks)
  • Recognition of structural changes in market composition

By embracing a more comprehensive valuation framework, investors can navigate the complexities of today’s markets with greater accuracy and confidence. As the financial landscape continues to evolve, so too must our tools for understanding and valuing it.

 

Brian Jacobs, CFA is responsible for Investment Solutions and Strategy at Aptus Capital Advisors. This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security. Be sure to consult with an investment and tax professional before implementing any investment strategy.

*Conceptual Illustration: Information presented in the above charts are for illustrative purposes only and should not be interpreted as actual performance of any investor’s account. As these are not actual results and completely assumed, they should not be relied upon for investment decisions. Actual results of individual investors will differ due to many factors, including individual investments and fees, client restrictions, and the timing of investments and cash flows.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The ASX is full of old, stodgy, low-growth companies

Finding single-digit PE stocks in an overvalued market

Is your fund manager skilful or just lucky?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

16 ASX stocks to buy and hold forever, updated

This time last year, I highlighted 16 ASX stocks that investors could own indefinitely. One year on, I look at whether there should be any changes to the list of stocks as well as which companies are worth buying now. 

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

2025-26 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ABS recently released figures which are used to determine key superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2025. This outlines the rates and thresholds that are changing and those that aren’t.  

Is Gen X ready for retirement?

With the arrival of the new year, the first members of ‘Generation X’ turned 60, marking the start of the MTV generation’s collective journey towards retirement. Are Gen Xers and our retirement system ready for the transition?

Why the $5.4 trillion wealth transfer is a generational tragedy

The intergenerational wealth transfer, largely driven by a housing boom, exacerbates economic inequality, stifles productivity, and impedes social mobility. Solutions lie in addressing the housing problem, not taxing wealth.

What Warren Buffett isn’t saying speaks volumes

Warren Buffett's annual shareholder letter has been fixture for avid investors for decades. In his latest letter, Buffett is reticent on many key topics, but his actions rather than words are sending clear signals to investors.

Latest Updates

Investing

Designing a life, with money to spare

Are you living your life by default or by design? It strikes me that many people are doing the former and living according to others’ expectations of them, leading to poor choices including with their finances.

Investment strategies

A closer look at defensive assets for turbulent times

After the recent market slump, it's a good time to brush up on the defensive asset classes – what they are, why hold them, and how they can both deliver on your goals and increase the reliability of your desired outcomes.

Financial planning

Are lifetime income streams the answer or just the easy way out?

Lately, there's been a push by Government for lifetime income streams as a solution to retirement income challenges. We run the numbers on these products to see whether they deliver on what they promise.

Shares

Is it time to buy the Big Four banks?

The stellar run of the major ASX banks last year left many investors scratching their heads. After a recent share price pullback, has value emerged in these banks, or is it best to steer clear of them?

Investment strategies

The useful role that subordinated debt can play in your portfolio

If you’re struggling to replace the hybrid exposure in your portfolio, you’re not alone. Subordinated debt is an option, and here is a guide on what it is and how it can fit into your investment mix.

Shares

Europe is back and small caps there offer significant opportunities

Trump’s moves on tariffs, defence, and Ukraine, have awoken European Governments after a decade of lethargy. European small cap manager, Alantra Asset Management, says it could herald a new era for the continent.

Shares

Lessons from the rise and fall of founder-led companies

Founder-led companies often attract investors due to leaders' personal stakes and long-term vision. But founder presence alone does not guarantee success, and the challenge is to identify which ones will succeed in the long term.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.