Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 529

Mid-caps deserve a closer look

Like the proverbial middle child, global mid-caps tend to be overlooked and underappreciated. However, mid-caps occupy a ‘sweet spot’ - offering potentially more growth than large caps and potentially less risk and volatility than small and micro-caps.

This asset class offers excellent opportunities for investors looking for global equity exposure, and a dedicated allocation to mid-caps might go a long way to improving a portfolio’s risk and return outcomes.

What makes mid-caps so appealing?

Diversification

One of the features of the global mid-cap universe is that it is far more diversified than the large cap MSCI World index. Today, the MSCI World index is dominated by a small number of mega cap technology stocks, known as the MANAMA stocks (Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet). This exposes the index to a high level of risk if any one (or more) of these stocks underperforms.

In the mid-cap universe, there is no single or group of stocks that dominate, and no stock comprises more than a small percentage of the overall market. At a sector level, the market is also more diverse. This diversification offers mid-cap investors a greater breadth of opportunity, as opposed to the large cap market which is driven by those few large tech stocks, making it harder to ‘pick the winners’.

Market size

There are a number of misconceptions about the mid-cap universe and the size of the stocks that occupy it. For instance, it is commonly assumed that global mid-caps are small, illiquid, and difficult to trade. However, this is not the case.

The MSCI World Mid Cap index consists of around 900 listed companies with a market cap range of around US$1 billion to US$40 billion. Outside of this index, there are around 3000 additional listed mid-cap companies. When you compare this to the MSCI World index - which has around 1,600 listed companies in the market cap range of US$1 billion to US$2900 billion - the mid-cap market clearly offers a lot more choice.

The MSCI Mid Cap index puts the total market size of the global mid-cap universe at approximately US$8.3 trillion. Both the number of listed companies, and market size, reinforce the abundance of opportunities for investors.

Additionally, when comparing the average market cap range of the global mid-cap index to the ASX 300, the mid-cap index has a larger average market cap (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: Average market cap of different equity indices

Despite the ASX 300 holding larger companies than the global mid-cap index, the global mid-cap index is still significantly larger on an average basis across all the companies it holds. For investors, this should alleviate any concerns that global mid-caps are small, illiquid and difficult to trade.

Low stock research

Another reason the mid-cap universe is appealing, is that it is less researched than its global large cap counterparts. With fewer analysts researching these mid-cap names, it increases the likelihood of high-quality businesses flying under the radar, allowing smart investors to seize upon mispricing opportunities. Investors can also ‘miss the forest for the trees’, and not realise that there are well-established businesses with strong track records alongside the more obvious listings of newer companies and business models.

The significantly lower analyst coverage of stocks in the mid-cap universe compared to large caps provides excellent opportunities for active management to add value by rigorous bottom-up research.

Company leaders

Unlike large caps many mid-cap stocks are businesses that are founder-led. These companies are more likely to have management teams which are innovative, agile, and with interests that strongly align with that of shareholders.

In Fidelity’s experience, the best ideas or ‘future leaders’ in the global mid-cap universe are typically business models that are either structural winners, technology disruptors, innovators, category killers and/or brand leaders.

A dedicated mid-cap portfolio exposure

It’s common for large cap global equity managers to have some exposure to the mid-cap market in their portfolio. Data from eVestment shows that the median large cap global equity manager typically holds 20-25% of their portfolio in mid-cap stocks.

While some investors consider this exposure ‘ticks the box’ for mid-cap allocation, there is a strong argument that investment portfolios should include a dedicated mid-cap exposure.

With the mid-cap market less researched than the large cap market, and with many more stocks to select from, it does beg the question: are large cap managers equipped to manage mid-cap investments?

Large cap managers tend to focus their time analysing the performance of the biggest stocks in their portfolios to determine how performance compares to the benchmark large cap index. Mid-caps are not generally their focus.

An attribution analysis from eVestment (Figure 2) bears this out. It looks at the median performance of 305 global large cap equity managers and shows that over five years, large cap equity managers underperformed in the mid-cap portion of their portfolios relative to the benchmark index.

From a portfolio construction perspective, we believe global mid-caps provide excellent complementary exposure to a global large cap equity portfolio, but having a dedicated mid-cap manager is likely to be an advantage.

Figure 2: Medium performance of mid-cap element of global large cap equity managers vs index

Sitting in this sweet spot, there is a compelling investment case for global mid-caps. The sector offers exposure to the broad global equity asset class, but also the opportunity for superior returns, and superior risk adjusted returns, compared to global large cap equities. And contrary to common belief, mid-caps are also on average more liquid than the Australian large cap universe.

In short, global mid-caps offer the opportunity for an excellent diversifying exposure with a greater probability of above-index performance over medium and longer time periods.

 

James Abela is Co-Portfolio Manager of the Fidelity Global Future Leaders Fund at Fidelity International, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This document is issued by FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009, AFSL 409340 (‘Fidelity Australia’), a member of the FIL Limited group of companies commonly known as Fidelity International. This document is intended as general information only. You should consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statement available on our website www.fidelity.com.au.

For more articles and papers from Fidelity, please click here.

© 2021 FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited. Fidelity, Fidelity International and the Fidelity International logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited.

 

  •   4 October 2023
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

The leading 2022 themes for global mid-sized companies

Not too big, not too small: the advantages of mid-caps

The far-flung past as prologue

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.