Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 588

The net benefit of living in Australia’s cities has fallen dramatically

It is well known that there are both benefits and costs to living and working in the city – higher wages on the one hand, and higher housing costs on the other. In this article, we refer to the higher wages in the cities relative to the regions as the urban wage premium and the higher housing costs in the cities relative to the regions as the urban housing cost premium.

Using the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, we find that, on average, housing costs – measured as the sum of both tenant-occupied rents and owner-occupied rents – are rising faster in the cities than in the regions.

The urban housing cost premium is increasing because of a widening gap in housing prices as measured by owner-occupied rents. Rising housing costs have been a strong feature of the Sydney and Melbourne housing markets.

A novel feature of the housing cost estimates from the HILDA Survey is that we can track how housing costs are changing for workers in different occupations and geographic regions.

The estimates indicate that housing costs have risen by more for city-based workers compared to regional workers across all occupations since the mid-2000s. This increase in housing costs is mostly driven by higher costs of home ownership, as measured by owner-occupier rents.

Why are housing costs rising more in the city than in the regions?

It is difficult to isolate a specific cause. Housing costs are determined by locational trends in supply and demand – with that demand also determined by relative earnings opportunities in different locations. It is hard to avoid the conclusion that housing supply has not kept up with rising housing demand in these locations.

A further possibility is that, in areas where housing supply is most constrained, immigration has contributed to housing demand, alongside other sources of demand.

Sydney and Melbourne remain the destinations of choice for many immigrants, which has brought many economic and cultural benefits to the cities. Over half of Australia’s foreign-born population lives in Sydney and Melbourne.

Regional areas, which typically find it easier to expand housing supply, do not have a high share of immigrants despite in-built incentives in the immigration system.

Without a corresponding increase in housing supply, stronger demand for housing in the cities may be contributing to higher housing prices. And, given the low shares of immigrants moving to the regions, they have not experienced the same housing demand increase. Higher wages and housing costs tend to interact.

Whatever the underlying causes, a given individual weighs up locational decisions based on relative housing costs and wage prospects between locations. To the extent that housing costs have risen faster than wages for many workers, this is likely to influence their decisions about where to locate.

Broadly speaking, in the early 2000s the benefit of living in capital cities – as measured via wages – outweighed the cost – as measured by housing. But that is no longer the case.

Unsurprisingly, given we have found that industrial workers no longer obtain a wage benefit from being in the city, their urban housing cost premium exceeds their urban wage premium – and that has been the case since the start of this century.

Similarly, for city-based care and service workers, their wage premium has fallen short of their housing premium for some time too. But, most strikingly, this phenomenon is now extending to knowledge workers who earn the highest urban wage premium.

The locational calculus is changing for many workers

For workers, on average, the incentive to stay in, or move to, the city has been weakening. The urban wage premium is no longer sufficient to offset the housing cost premium associated with living in the city.

This average effect does not apply to every individual – many workers have above-average urban wage premiums. Many incumbent city-dwellers have accumulated significant equity in their homes, such that the current urban housing cost premium could be less likely to affect their locational choices.

Hence, a change in the urban wage premium and a rise in the urban housing cost premium may not matter to the same extent for all.

For some, the benefits of city living are more than just wages, including access to a higher share of cafes, bars and restaurants and educational opportunities, as well as proximity to family and established community networks. On the other hand, those seeking to purchase a home for the first time, face a pivotal locational decision. For them, the shift in relative wage and housing cost premiums could prove more decisive.

The combination of rising relative housing costs and flat-to-falling relative wages in the cities may explain why people in their 30s are leaving Sydney and, to a lesser extent, Melbourne. This exodus has been particularly strong for those in industrial, care, and service jobs.

Millennials in Sydney are most impacted

Sydney and Melbourne are experiencing outflows of people to other parts of Australia – with more people leaving than coming, excluding overseas immigrants.

In Melbourne, since 2006, people of all age groups have been leaving the city, with 20-year-olds the exception – they are the only age group entering on net. In Sydney, the outflows are stronger and those in their 30s are leaving at the highest rates.

The fact that those in their 30s are leaving reinforces the idea that rising housing costs are a key factor in their location decision. People in this age bracket will be making life decisions, such as getting married and having children, which are typically associated with demand for larger homes.

Where are they going?

For Melbourne, people are more likely to move to the outer suburbs than leave Victoria entirely. For Sydney, some people are moving to coastal regions like the Central Coast and Wollongong, while others are leaving the state altogether.

People who are 30 years and older are moving away from high housing price areas to low housing price areas, suggesting they are seeking home ownership. This is not a new behaviour – but the link has become stronger as housing prices have risen over time.

By contrast, people in their 20s – who are more likely to be renters than buyers – are moving towards areas with more expensive housing. This holds true regardless of labour market status. Those in their 20s may still be choosing to live in the cities to gain better educational opportunities and access amenities.

We note three major economic implications from the above: risk of labour misallocation, cities becoming less occupational diverse, and an opportunity for Australia’s regions.

Risk of labour misallocation

Productivity and real income growth have slowed over recent decades. This report raises the possibility that, for some young people, the housing cost premium in cities could be a decisive motivation for moving – causing them to move away from areas of high wages and productivity, and potentially high human capital investment.

To the extent that constraints on the supply of housing in the cities are raising the cost of housing and preventing workers from moving to locations that maximise their productivity, this will lead to a misallocation of Australia’s workforce.

Less occupationally diverse cities

The trajectory of wage and housing premia is such that industrial and care workers have faced the strongest incentives to locate away from cities. A key question is whether this could lead, over the long term, to greater occupational segregation across locations: with highly qualified knowledge workers located in the cities and industrial and care and service workers in regions.

Complete segregation is impractical – there will be demand for the services of industrial and care and service workers in the city. Hence, wages could adjust to attract them.

Opportunity for Australia’s regions

The movement of some city-based workers into the regions could also represent an opportunity for the regions. Workers who leave the city tend to earn more than their new neighbours who are in the regions and bring with them city-based skill accumulation.

In addition, the regions have the potential to continue to attract and retain more city-based workers. But it will be important that regional housing supply can adjust, to accommodate the additional demand without upward pressure on housing costs that could create inequality within regions.

 

This article is an abridged excerpt from the e61 institute’s research paper titled “The Lucky Country or the Lucky City?”. You can read the full report here. Contributors include Michael Brennan, Elyse Dwyer, Nick Garvin, Theo Gibbons, Rose Khattar, Gianni La Cava, Aaron Wong.

 

4 Comments
Stephen Owens
December 02, 2024

The rising cost of living in cities really hits home—so many people I know are moving to regional areas to escape high housing costs. It makes you think about how cities will adapt to retain their workforce. 

Gene
December 02, 2024

It’ll be interesting to see data by occupation, ‘care and service workers’ does not mean much.

James
December 01, 2024

The article underscores a significant decline in the net benefits of urban living in Australia, highlighting the urgent need to bolster regional infrastructure investment. Current spending levels are insufficient to support the growing trend of regional migration, necessitating substantial increases to accommodate and sustain this movement.

Redirecting large-scale investments from metropolitan areas to regional centres is crucial. Projects such as fast rail networks can enhance connectivity, stimulate regional economies, and alleviate urban congestion. This strategic shift would not only support regional growth but also promote a more balanced national development.

Moreover, as major employers scale back hybrid work policies, with remote work becoming less prevalent, the necessity for robust regional infrastructure intensifies. Ensuring that regional areas are well-equipped with essential services and connectivity is vital to support both existing residents and newcomers seeking alternatives to city living.

Steve
November 28, 2024

Unfortunately, my experience is that infrastructure in the regions cannot keep pace with those city dwellers looking for a lifestyle change. Governments continue to plough investment into big city infrastructure projects, particularly roads, which seemingly comes at the expense of regional road upgrades and other development. I would be interested to know how much of the data presented in this article is incorporated in the urban planning policies of state governments. Such internal migration movements also has ramifications for the political process, in terms of shifting socio-economic demographics of existing electorates - particularly the regional seats.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Australia's house price league table

Why has nothing worked to fix Australia's housing mess?

House price doomsayers: Could housing prices really fall by 20%?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

CBA, AUSTRAC and our Orwellian privacy laws

Imagine receiving an email from your bank demanding to know if you keep cash at home and threatening to freeze your accounts if you don't respond in seven days. This happened to me and it raises disturbing questions. 

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.