Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 239

10 checkpoints before setting up an SMSF

SMSFs are one of the success stories of our superannuation system, with about 600,000 funds in operation being set up at the rate of over 30,000 a year. Over 1.1 million Australians are trustees of their SMSF, making the structure a focal point of many retirement plans.

But they are not suitable for everyone, and here are some of the key issues to determine whether an SMSF is suitable to meet your objectives and circumstances. They have been developed to address concerns about people being pushed or rushed into an SMSF, and to protect access to the SMSF option for the long term.

1. What do you or your family want to achieve by establishing an SMSF? This explores your reasons for investigating this strategy and whether it aligns with your short-, medium- and long-term goals. There may be better alternatives that may meet your true objectives.

2. Is running a strategy via an SMSF suitable for you in terms of your experience, knowledge and available time? There are many busy executives, truck drivers and small business owners that I have talked out of running an SMSF when they can’t even find one hour in their week to schedule a meeting or engage via Skype to understand their trustee obligations, yet they think they could run an $800,000 investment portfolio.

3. What funds do you have to rollover from an existing fund and are you able to move those funds? Some people are in government, military or state funds that cannot be accessed before a certain age, or maybe a Defined Benefit Scheme that’s too sweet to leave. Can future Super Guarantee contributions be redirected to an SMSF as some employers have a mandated fund under enterprise bargaining agreements? Are there high exit fees or underlying investments that are not liquid?

4. Have insurance needs been adequately identified and addressed for your future protection? Consider the current insurances and do a needs analysis to see if they should be maintained, altered, replaced or cancelled.

5. Are you clear about trustee responsibilities? You may need to commit to more education before setting up the SMSF. Urgency to set up a fund does not remove your duties.

6. Do you appreciate the costs of setting up and the ongoing expenses of administering an SMSF as well as costs related to specific strategies you want to undertake. This includes fees associated with advice, investments, establishment, legal and administration?

7. Have you done a complete cost versus benefit analysis of an SMSF? Are you fully informed or more influenced by a friend or adviser who may have other motivations than your best interests?

8. Have you developed an SMSF investment strategy that is compliant and will help to achieve your objectives? Your expectations need to be grounded in reality, not some magic long-term excess returns based on a few myths.

9. Will the SMSF engage in borrowing or gearing, and what is a reasonable level of gearing in your circumstances based on your retirement plans and analyse the affordability of the gearing strategy?

10. How will the SMSF be administered and which professional services will you need, including financial advice, investments and legal? Have you chosen software that will minimise the administration and reduce costs, and make the work involved easier, especially for monitoring performance and preparing reports at tax time?

They’re not for everyone

Don’t underestimate the time and knowledge required. I hesitate to mention one client who said he could do his research on his mobile phone while driving to work. Or the couple who felt they were ‘property experts’ because they had four Queensland regional properties, having never visited any of them or done more than a cursory Google search. They were headed for a low income, negative capital growth portfolio. On asking for property inspection reports, we found they were also up for tens of thousands of dollars in repairs and maintenance over the coming years. It was agreed that their super was safer in their well-diversified existing strategy than another ‘punt’ on property in an SMSF until they learned more about property investing.

There is more to setting up and managing an SMSF than many people realise, and the process requires the right strategy at the right time to secure future financial security.

 

Liam Shorte is a specialist SMSF adviser and Director of Verante Financial Planning. This article contains general information only and does not address the circumstances of any individual. This article draws on a circular issued by The Financial Ombudsman Service.

8 Comments
Steve M
February 08, 2018

Liam provides some sensible advice about considering whether a SMSF is right for you before starting one. (Thanks - great article!) David Owen raises the point I was going to make about an exit strategy from managing the SMSF. I have to admit that alternative retirement strategies is a huge area of ignorance for me. An area that Cufflinks could explore is - what are the alternatives? David and Gen Y mention wrap strategies, but I have not seen any articles that cover these types of products. I spend a lot of time on my SMSF and I do enjoy managing my own money, but I know the time will come when it is too difficult - then what? How do people find the income stream products that will suit them, if not in a SMSF?

SMSFCoach
February 09, 2018

Steve M, you could look at the retail Super Wrap option from any retail provider and AustralianSuper and other Industry funds offer similar DIY options even in Pension phase. You should also consider the option of switching your SMSF to a Small APRA fund with a professional trustee once you feel it is getting too much. That way you can retain your portfolio, still have some control but have the compliance Managed for you.

Gen Y
February 08, 2018

Too many people continue to be pushed into SMSFs unnecessarily by their accountants. I have plenty of friends (mid 30s) who have been told by their accoutant they need to be in a SMSF with their aligned adviser then putting them in a portfolio of shares and managed funds... something they could have got in a Wrap product for 30 basis points.

Meanwhile ASIC would prefer to investigate the obvious that Insto advisers are aligned to their i. House products...

SMSFCoach
February 09, 2018

I agree GenY, a wrap account is suitable for most who just want to control a portfolio of top 300 shares and Managed funds. There has to be other client led needs or objectives for a fund not just an accountant’s “you’ve got enough to run an SMSF”. I shut down a number of these annually. Most licensed SMSF advisers don’t want to see people in SMSFs that are not suited to running one as that puts the future of the sector at risk.

Len the aussie
February 08, 2018

SMSF seems to be the buzz word if you can afford commercial property out of your fund and lease it out as the rents go into the fund and tax free and you spend it if possible,

watched a buddy trying to keep up with it and I think he is getting too old to enjoy it :)

David Owen
February 08, 2018

We must also factor in the fact that, as people age, their ability to properly manage and administer a SMSF reduces. This particularly the case if one of the members/trustees falls ill or worse. It horrifies me when I see advisors who recommend to clients who are say 65 or thereabouts to set up a SMSF so that they can "control" their superannuation.

My wife and I have has our SMSF since 1980. Have we really benefitted from it? I doubt it. At long last, we are now in the process of closing it down and utilising off the shelf Wrap accounts. Lower cost and no compliance issues.

PS I am a financial planner of some 30 years experience.

Graham Hand
February 08, 2018

Hi Frank, I agree that some of the reasons for having an SMSF are overstated, especially reducing costs, as there are many institutional funds which cost less than 0.2% to do everything, and it would be difficult for most SMSF trustees to beat this. But where an SMSF has unique advantages is the ability to put almost any asset into super, such as unlisted bonds, unlisted property and alternatives not on platforms.

Frank
February 08, 2018

The strongest reason to have an SMSF is if you enjoy managing your own money. I'll bet the majority of SMSFs lose money if you costed in all the time people spent fiddling and trading and learning the rules and administering them. Otherwise, they should be enjoying life on other things. Let's talk about returns AFTER all costs involved in managing them.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Clime time: Asset allocation decisions for SMSFs

SMSF trustees who question their capacity and look for options

Avoid these top five errors in your SMSF annual return

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

16 ASX stocks to buy and hold forever, updated

This time last year, I highlighted 16 ASX stocks that investors could own indefinitely. One year on, I look at whether there should be any changes to the list of stocks as well as which companies are worth buying now. 

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

2025-26 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ABS recently released figures which are used to determine key superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2025. This outlines the rates and thresholds that are changing and those that aren’t.  

Is Gen X ready for retirement?

With the arrival of the new year, the first members of ‘Generation X’ turned 60, marking the start of the MTV generation’s collective journey towards retirement. Are Gen Xers and our retirement system ready for the transition?

Why the $5.4 trillion wealth transfer is a generational tragedy

The intergenerational wealth transfer, largely driven by a housing boom, exacerbates economic inequality, stifles productivity, and impedes social mobility. Solutions lie in addressing the housing problem, not taxing wealth.

What Warren Buffett isn’t saying speaks volumes

Warren Buffett's annual shareholder letter has been fixture for avid investors for decades. In his latest letter, Buffett is reticent on many key topics, but his actions rather than words are sending clear signals to investors.

Latest Updates

Investing

Designing a life, with money to spare

Are you living your life by default or by design? It strikes me that many people are doing the former and living according to others’ expectations of them, leading to poor choices including with their finances.

Investment strategies

A closer look at defensive assets for turbulent times

After the recent market slump, it's a good time to brush up on the defensive asset classes – what they are, why hold them, and how they can both deliver on your goals and increase the reliability of your desired outcomes.

Financial planning

Are lifetime income streams the answer or just the easy way out?

Lately, there's been a push by Government for lifetime income streams as a solution to retirement income challenges. We run the numbers on these products to see whether they deliver on what they promise.

Shares

Is it time to buy the Big Four banks?

The stellar run of the major ASX banks last year left many investors scratching their heads. After a recent share price pullback, has value emerged in these banks, or is it best to steer clear of them?

Investment strategies

The useful role that subordinated debt can play in your portfolio

If you’re struggling to replace the hybrid exposure in your portfolio, you’re not alone. Subordinated debt is an option, and here is a guide on what it is and how it can fit into your investment mix.

Shares

Europe is back and small caps there offer significant opportunities

Trump’s moves on tariffs, defence, and Ukraine, have awoken European Governments after a decade of lethargy. European small cap manager, Alantra Asset Management, says it could herald a new era for the continent.

Shares

Lessons from the rise and fall of founder-led companies

Founder-led companies often attract investors due to leaders' personal stakes and long-term vision. But founder presence alone does not guarantee success, and the challenge is to identify which ones will succeed in the long term.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.