Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 599

Australia: why the chase for even higher dividend yields?

For the past 20 years, one of the most common questions I have received from Aussie retirees, their advisers, and ‘FIRE’ warriors living off their long-term 'passive income' portfolios is: ‘How can we get more income from our investments?’

This obsession with boosting portfolio income has always struck me as a little strange because Australia has, for many decades, had the highest dividend paying share market in the world by far. Aussie investors are living in the best country in the world for dividend yields. And that’s BEFORE franking credits! When you add franking credits on top of the already very high cash dividend yields, our overall dividend yields (especially for tax-free retirees) are twice what they are in other major markets around the world.

(There are, of course, always some tiny markets that have higher dividend yields from time to time for a variety of reasons – eg Kenya, Nigeria, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Slovenia, Serbia, Lithuania at the moment.)

Today’s chart shows average dividend yields from the Australian share market (ASX200) versus other major global share markets for the past four decades. For Australia we have two types of dividend yields - the cash yield (as in other countries), and also the ‘grossed-up’ yield including franking credits (this is the yield for tax-free retirees).

For more on franking credits, how they work, and how much value they add, see '‘Frankly my dear...we need to include Franking Credits in reporting and portfolio planning’.

Even in the Covid years like 2021 when bank deposits were paying zero interest, and companies were cutting or cancelling dividends, the overall ASX market still paid a cash dividend yield of 3.7%, or 5% including franking credits. Then it jumped back up in 2022 to 4.5% cash yield (6.1% gross yield), then 5.8% gross yield in 2023, and then 5.2% gross yield in 2024.

Who would want more than that?

Envy of the world

American retirees generally use 2% as their mental benchmark for share portfolio yields, because dividend yields on the US share market have averaged around 2% for decades. (see table at the end of this story for all the numbers). 2% yields are ‘normal’ for Americans, and they are accustomed to thinking about a 2% yield for spending and aiming to leave the portfolio intact to grow. (Actually, US yields are just 1.3% in the current tech bubble.)

When I tell them Aussie investors complain about 4% yields from the Aussie share market, they respond with something like, “Wow, I could live off 2% and re-invest the rest for future growth!”, or “What do they do with all that extra cash?”

Portfolio heaven

Long-term retirement portfolios designed to fund inflation-indexed living expenses for decades, need to consist mainly of assets that offer inflation protection plus some real growth ahead of inflation. Typically, they have a total return target of ‘CPI+4%’, and this generally means mostly shares (plus perhaps some other ‘growth’ assets like commercial property).

(Why ‘CPI+4%’ target returns? So you can withdraw 4% of the balance each year, with withdrawals rising with inflation to maintain your living standard, and the balance after withdrawals also at least keeping pace with inflation. Why 4%? Because that has been found to provide a high degree of confidence you will never run out of money, or at least not for a couple of decades or so.)

A typical CPI+4% portfolio translates into a 25-times ‘multiple’ of your spending budget (1/25 = 4%) and this 25 times multiple is the standard starting point for ‘How much do we need?’ discussions when planning for retirement (or should be anyway). For example, if your spending budget is $100,000 pa, you would need $2.5 million if you are looking for financial freedom, not welfare dependence. (But that’s another story for another day!)

Australia’s Superannuation system is conceptually based on this ‘25-times multiple of spending’ idea. The ‘minimum withdrawal’ rules for Super accounts in ‘Pension’ phase start with a minimum withdrawal rate of 4% (for retirees below age 65). This 4% withdrawal rate = 25 times multiple of spending budget.

In every other country but Australia, dividend yields are well below 4%, so retirees generally need to sell down some of their shares each year to fund their 4% withdrawals (for a standard 25-times portfolio).

But not here! Australia is the only country in the world where the dividend yield on the broad share market is almost always HIGHER than the 4% withdrawal rate! To quote a raw onion eating former PM – ‘How good is that!’

It means a typical retiree portfolio invested mainly in broad ASX funds/ETFs, or in a wide spread of direct shares, can just live off the dividends without even thinking about selling shares.

Avoid the ‘big switch’ into bonds!

Portfolio management textbooks (all US based) are obsessed with people making the ‘big switch’ from shares to bonds when they retire in order to increase the portfolio yield to fund retirement living expenses. But in Australia, the share market is already yielding more than necessary to fund the withdrawals, and also usually higher than the running yield on bonds, so there is need for the ‘big switch’ into bonds!

(Also, bonds have no inflation protection, no growth, and make very poor long-term investments with the return of inflation).

No sequencing risk or volatility worries

Another plus for Aussies is that the dreaded ‘Sequencing Risk’ also largely disappears! ‘Sequencing risk’ is the risk of having to sell shares at low prices in a bust, to fund regular withdrawals. Because yields usually exceed withdrawals, there is rarely a need to sell shares just to fund regular living expenses, as the rest of the world has to do.

When you do want to sell some of the portfolio to free up capital for some specific purpose (eg to help the kids buy a house, or go on a big trip, etc), you can usually choose your own timing – not be forced to sell when prices are low in a bust.

High dividend yields deliver all of these benefits to Aussies - it is unique in the world!

Diversified portfolios

Most diversified retiree portfolios have global shares alongside their Aussie share allocation (plus also some bonds – refer above!), and these do reduce the overall portfolio yield. However, I still find a large proportion of Aussie retirees have a (rather unhealthy) fondness for old favourites like the big bank banks, miners, Telstra, Woollies, etc – all of which pay dividends even HIGHER than the overall market average yield.

A typical long term diversified portfolio of say: 40% Aussie shares (5.3% grossed-up yield currently) + 40% global shares (2% yield) + 20% government/corporate bonds (say 4.5% yield) will be paying an overall portfolio yield of just under 4%, which is about double what US retirees get on their US-oriented portfolios.

The underlying problem

So, back to the question of why so many Aussie retirees are always asking how to increase their (already world beating) yields on their share portfolios?

Even with the broad Aussie share market routinely yielding 4%+ (or 5%+ with franking credits), many Aussies still can’t resist the temptation to chase even higher yields. Many are lured into all sorts of things like - ‘covered-call’ option schemes, high-risk mortgage funds, opaque structured ‘private credit’ funds stacked full of risky property construction loans, black-box trading schemes, and straight-out frauds dressed up as ‘safe’ high-yield investments.

I put their endless search for higher yields down to poor management of expectations at the outset. It’s all about planning, understanding markets, and communication.

Every retirement planning tool and calculator I have seen has fundamental problems. That includes retirement planners and calculators provided by government departments (eg moneysmart), industry groups like the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA), every industry fund (eg. Australian Super, HostPlus, etc), as well as investment platforms, financial planning firms, and a host of online retirement calculators.

From what I have seen (and I have seen hundreds) they all use very simplistic assumptions about critical variables like inflation, financial market returns, life span, etc. They use nice, neat, straight lines and smooth curves, they assume markets are always fairly priced, and they don’t allow room for volatility or changes in conditions, or changes in circumstances.

Even the more complex models use fancy terms like ‘stochastic distributions’ and ‘monte-carlo simulations’ which are nonsense because they assume returns are random and ’normally distributed’. In the real world, returns are demonstrably not random nor normally distributed! Never have been – never will be. (Why? Because markets are run by human emotions like fear and greed, not calm, considered, logical reason)

These simplistic retirement models are dangerous and create unrealistic expectations. When things don’t follow those nice, neat, straight lines and smooth curves, people lose confidence and start to worry. ‘Do we have enough?’ ‘Will we run out of money?’, ‘I can’t go back to work, I’m 86!’, and so on.

Better initial planning over the big questions like - ‘How much do we need?’, ‘What if inflation is higher?’, ‘What if returns are lower?”, ‘What if I live to 100?’, and so on - would set more realistic expectations and engender greater peace of mind for a long and happy retirement.

I will also leave for another day two very important issues related to high dividend yields –

  1. Why are Australian company dividend yields much higher than the rest of the world? Spoiler alert – it is NOT the Dividend Imputation (franking credit) scheme – our yields were higher than the US and the rest of the world decades before the introduction of franking credits in 1987.
  2. The downsides of high dividend yields have been low profit growth (because companies retain very little for further growth) and lower returns on equity.

Here is the data for today’s chart -

 

Ashley Owen, CFA is Founder and Principal of OwenAnalytics. Ashley is a well-known Australian market commentator with over 40 years’ experience. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual. You can subscribe to OwenAnalytics Newsletter here. Original article is here: Australia: Highest dividend yields in the world, so why the endless chase for even higher yields?.

 

14 Comments
bluey
February 21, 2025

Great article. The chart shows why an Aussie blue chip equity-only strategy works; a greater than 5% DIVIDEND return in every decade. There is no need to diversify with bonds as some shares act like bonds [TLS, NAB] and the trick here is to top up during share price dips, to lower the average. Dividends and other savings are invested into whichever blue chip is suffering share price pressure at the time. Some will say ''Oh but you miss out on international growth like the tech stocks'; but so what? No currency issues or decisions when to sell!
Financial freedom was achieved in under 20 yrs with this aussie blue chip strategy, and as Ashley says, I now have no need to sell anything, and the compounding continues. Youngsters with time on their hands take note, no need to take a risk on cryptocurrency etc.

ashley owen
February 22, 2025

hi bluey
good advice for the yung'uns out there!
But you can't force it. Let the yung'uns wear themselves out with meme-coins and [insert latest fad here]. When they tire of that they will settle down (my daughter is through it and settling down, my son is still in the middle of it), but we'll wait n see!)
cheers
ao

AlanB
February 21, 2025

This article incorrectly assumes dividend stability. Dividends also fall. Unpredictably, but regularly. From the GFC, covid and market changes, as every BHP investor has just been informed. When dividends fall, our income falls. So in anticipation of dividend unpredictability the question logically arises: "How can we get more income from our investments?"

ashley owen
February 22, 2025

AlanB - yes I agree dividends fall. Of course they do. But aussie div yields over the entire market are still highest in the known world. I have been a BHP shareholder for 20+ years. The 2021-2022 BHP div yields were mostly fluff based on temporary windfall iron ore prices and profits, so I regarded them as temporary 1-off bonuses out of the blue and not repeatable. Divs have now fallen back to more sustainable levels, so we now get back to business as usual. My premise remains - with ASX div yields 5%+ (after the div cuts from the recent, temporary windfall iron ore bonanza), who would possibly want more than that?
cheers
ao

Kevin
February 23, 2025

Then of course my CBA.My net yield of around 6.5% ,40 cents on whatever the price was on any given day at the start ( plus franking credits ,39% if memory serves). Silly enough to reinvest all the dividend for decades. Now shall we say 3% net on around $1 million,just for doing nothing at all.I was silly enough to buy more of them on price falls,I still chastise myself for doing that. All the clever people spent all of those decades telling me the dividends are not reliable,I can think of a company that went bust That proves CBA will go bust. My luck was right out,I managed to pick 3 disasters like that.

Picking 3 disasters of course means ,concentration risk,sequencing risk,I haven't got a well balanced portfolio,I didn't buy and sell ticker symbols to avoid the concentration risk etc.I didn't follow the crowd,I have no intention of buying the products the financial industry wants to sell me. On and on and on.

The only time and place to have more fun than that would involve two people taking their clothes off. I'm always amazed why people work so hard to avoid making money and make up such complicated nonsense.

I don't know about the 5% ,I would never bother working it out . However it is rough enough to be close enough to being bang on for me.

Jon Kalkman
February 22, 2025

We all tend to focus on the volatility of share prices - that is all the media is interested in - but income investors are much more interested in the volatility of dividends, which is very low.
See here. www.firstlinks.com.au/doubling-down-dividends

In any case, all that is required is a cash buffer to insure against the rare occasions when dividends fall. In the GFC, share prices fell by 50%, but dividends were reduced by only 25%. COVID was worse because some dividends were stopped altogether. The size of that cash buffer depends your appetite for risk because cash also has an opportunity cost as excess cash could be invested in shares that grow their dividends (with franking credits) over time.

Ben
February 21, 2025

The 4% rule is based on a 60/40 bond equities folio; you can't cite that in the same breath as talking about it applying as a safe withdrawal rate to an all equities-all growth folio.

Dudley
February 21, 2025

"the ‘grossed-up’ yield including franking credits":

dividend return 4%, Company tax rate 30%, inflation 3%, years 111, present value capital 1, future value capital 1, payment at end of each year:

[ Dividend recipient marginal ]

Tax rate 0%:
= PMT((1 + (1 - 0%) * (4% / (1 - 30%))) / (1 + 3%) - 1, 111, -1, 1, 0)
= 2.635% / y.

Tax rate 15%:
= PMT((1 + (1 - 15%) * (4% / (1 - 30%))) / (1 + 3%) - 1, 111, -1, 1, 0)
= 1.803% / y.

Tax rate 30%:
= PMT((1 + (1 - 30%) * (4% / (1 - 30%))) / (1 + 3%) - 1, 111, -1, 1, 0)
= 0.971% / y.

Tax rate 47%:
= PMT((1 + (1 - 47%) * (4% / (1 - 30%))) / (1 + 3%) - 1, 111, -1, 1, 0)
= 0.028% / y.
= 0% / y.

Since 1982 retail bank deposits have returned 0% after tax and inflation - similar to dividends.

Share dividends and retail bank deposits compete for ownership.

Share price growth is the return premium for risk of share ownership.
No risk for bank deposits, no premium.

Dudley
February 21, 2025

"Since 1982 retail bank deposits have returned 0% after [ 47% ] tax and inflation - similar to dividends.".

ashley owen
February 21, 2025

hi dudley - not sure what all of those numbers mean, but good luck with it!

Dudley
February 21, 2025

"numbers mean": after tax, after franking, after inflation cash per year per $1 invested = % real net return.

Jim Bonham
February 20, 2025

Thanks for this article, Ashley.
It's good to see a challenge to the knee-jerk association between dividends and shareholder's income that pervades much commentary. There are pros and cons, but an income-oriented investor can simply sell shares when needed and does not necessarily need dividends. Doesn't work too well if the shares continually head south but, in that case, dividends won't be sustainable either.
Franking credits continue to confuse many people. Quite simply, they constitute both taxable income for the investor, and provisional tax held temporarily by the ATO until the tax return is processed - exactly in analogy to PAYE tax on employment income. Confusion can be avoided if commentators always focus on the grossed-up dividend.

lyn
February 21, 2025

Jim, hear, hear

cb
February 20, 2025

Great article. Mix of new perspective well researched and nice writing style. congratulations and thankyou Owen

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The challenges with building a dividend portfolio

Should you bank on the Westpac buy-back?

Let's make this clear again ... franking credits are fair

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirement is a risky business for most people

While encouraging people to draw down on their accumulated wealth in retirement might be good public policy, several million retirees disagree because they are purposefully conserving that capital. It’s time for a different approach.

The perfect portfolio for the next decade

This examines the performance of key asset classes and sub-sectors in 2024 and over longer timeframes, and the lessons that can be drawn for constructing an investment portfolio for the next decade.

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

The challenges with building a dividend portfolio

Getting regular, growing income from stocks is tougher with the dividend yield on the ASX nearing 25-year lows. Here are some conventional and not-so-conventional ideas for investors wanting to build a dividend portfolio.

How much do you need to retire?

Australians are used to hearing dire warnings that they don't have enough saved for a comfortable retirement. Yet most people need to save a lot less than you might think — as long as they meet an important condition.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 594 with weekend update

It’s well documented that many retirees draw down the minimum amount required and die with much of their super balances untouched. This explores the reasons why and some potential solutions to address the issue.

  • 16 January 2025

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

9 ways to fix Australia's housing crisis

Decades of policy failure have induced a fall in housing affordability. Unless painful changes are made, an underclass will emerge in a society that is supposed to boast the one of the world's highest standards of living.

Shares

Australia: why the chase for even higher dividend yields?

Australia boasts one of the world's highest dividend yielding sharemarkets, providing substantial benefits to investors and retirees. Despite this, individuals often stretch for even more yield, to their detriment.

Shares

MIGA – Make Income Great Again

The Australian sharemarket seems to be rewarding a number of unprofitable companies on the promise of future riches. Yet profits and cashflows still matter, as a recent case study of Domino's Pizza shows.

Shares

Mapping future US market returns

Exceptional returns from the US sharemarket over the past decade have driven by sales growth, margin expansion, rising valuations, and dividends. Predicting future returns requires careful consideration of these factors.

Shares

Read this before you go all in on US equities

US equities rule global markets, but history is littered with examples of markets that seemed invincible — until they weren’t. Diversification will be key for investor portfolios going forwards.

Property

What impact would scrapping stamp duty have on housing?

Increasing house prices pose challenges for housing affordability. This investigates the impact of stamp duty on the property market, and how removing the tax could help address several key issues.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.