Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 397

Is Australia turning Japanese? Watch these stocks

On 15 February 2021, the Japan Nikkei Index hit 30,000 for the first time since 1990. Media reports celebrated the milestone. However, we think it highlights the misery Japanese equity investors have endured for more than three decades. The Nikkei is still 23% below the all-time-high achieved in December 1989 at the peak of one the greatest equity bull markets in history. Since then the Japanese equity investor has endured an annualised capital loss of 0.2% and a paltry total return of 1.1% p.a. with dividends. 

How did this happen? Can it happen in Australia?

Why Japan has performed poorly

Our analysis indicates the three main drivers of the dismal equity returns in Japan include:

1. High starting valuations

2. Dilutive equity issuance, and

3. Mediocre profits growth.

First, the Japanese equity market traded on Price/Earnings ratio of 60x in 1989. At the time it was the most expensive market in the world, by far, and it is a valuation level US tech stocks achieved in the late 1990s bull market. Now the Japanese equity market trades on 23x and the derating over the last 31 years has been a 3% per annum drag on equity market returns.

The second largest contributor to poor returns has been dilution. While Japanese profits have grown by around 4.6% p.a. since the peak in the bull market, Earnings Per Share (EPS) growth has been a puny 2.8%. Much of this dilution has come from recapitalising the overly-leveraged banks. However, Japan Inc’s unwillingness to put equity investors first as stakeholders has led to an erosion of equity returns if it means not sacking employees or restructuring businesses.

Third, mediocre profit growth has contributed to poor returns, but we think this should not be over emphasised. Profit growth of 4.6% p.a. is only 2% lower than what we have enjoyed in Australia over the same period. We think much of the difference has been due to the less forgiving inflationary backdrop in Japan.

So it is de-rating and dilution which have been the biggest culprits of the lost decades for Japanese equity investors. It has been less about deflation and an aging of the population, in our view.

Watch the ridiculous prices and equity diluters

To avoid future lost decades, our work suggests equity investors will need to avoid stocks which are ludicrously priced and are also likely to be big shareholder diluters (that is, issue large amounts of capital when not required) in the years to come.

While we don’t see either for the entire Australian equity market (but we are still early into the current bull cycle), we can see parts of the market which could deliver painful shareholder returns over the long-term.

The buy-now, pay-later (BNPL) sector could be one area. The stocks here are exorbitantly priced with Afterpay trading on 250x EV/EBIT. Potentially dragging shareholder returns further could be the capital intensity of these businesses.  Credit providers have an insatiable appetite for new equity if they would like to grow. Afterpay, for example, has grown its share count by 20% over the last two years. Shareholders should expect further issuance to come. Afterpay just raised $1.5 billion in a convertible debt issue.

Another potential lost decade sector could be the infrastructure stocks. These companies are highly valued and are benefitting from low bond yields which keeps down their cost of capital. However, shareholders may have to endure dilution and de-rating in a world where bond yields push higher on a sustained basis.

While the potential for a lost decade should not weigh on short-term investor willingness to buy into these stocks, longer-term investors should avoid areas of the market that are turning Japanese. This is a sorry chart and set of numbers (ATH=All Time High).

 

Hasan Tevfik is a Senior Research Analyst at MST Marquee. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any financial instrument or to participate in any trading strategy.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Winners and losers in sharemarkets, 2017/18

Buy the dips?

The ASX is full of old, stodgy, low-growth companies

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.