Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 181

Insights from legendary fund manager, Howard Marks

Howard Marks spoke at the Sohn Hearts & Minds Investment Leaders Conference in Sydney on 11 November 2016.

Howard Marks is a successful investor and writer, and Co-Chairman of Oaktree Capital Management, which he co-founded in 1995. Howard has become known in the investment community for his 'Oaktree memos' to clients which detail investment strategies and he has published several books on investing.

Howard Marks and his Oaktree Capital manage about US$100 billion, predominantly in distressed credit, and he has been writing his ‘Oaktree memos’ since 1990.

On Donald Trump, he said he’s in the ‘I don’t know’ camp. It’s premature to take action, at least until some of his appointments are known. The investment implications depend on how much he will try to implement what he's said during the campaign, and how cooperative the Senate will be. He does not have the control of the Senate to the extent many think as there are narrow margins including people who said will not support him.

Trump should be a pro business on paper, probably more than Clinton, although his view on trade is a big negative. Infrastructure spending and tax cuts would be good for business.

The move to populism is a big issue. Trump touched on an anger, he didn’t create one. He received 55 million votes, including from old rural, non-college educated white guys who are not doing too well. The minority of Americans think their kids will be better off than their parents. The economy will grow more slowly as America has already reached much of its potential.

The idea of efficient markets is compelling. If something is cheap, don’t expect it to stay cheap. Trends tend to eliminate cheapness. Some markets are more efficient than others, which is why he does not operate in well-known, well-appreciated stocks. Knowledge is cumulative, and inefficient markets move to efficient, although there are cyclical inefficiencies.

Oaktree is the leading firm in distressed debt. What is perfect distressed debt theme? It looks worse than it is, so it’s cheap. He avoids technology and fashion stocks, and he needs a sector which can be analysed from the outside, which is why he avoids financial institutions. It’s not possible to evaluate millions of derivative transactions that sit in banks.

He invests in traditional manufacturers which he can analyse. He likes good companies with bad balance sheets, often due to over leverage. He uses bankruptcy laws where the old owners are wiped out and the debt holders take control. His business depends on the availability of distressed companies, but default rates are below average at the moment. This is not prime season for him.

Second level thinking requires a different type of thinking at a deeper level, and the best investors must move from first to second level. In order to outperform, you have to do things differently, you need to think differently. But also need to be better. That’s the hard part as most people flock to the consensus. That’s why there are few superior investors.

There’s a saying that 'you can’t coach height'. It’s not clear you can create second level thinking. When an analyst says he should buy Ford because they just brought out a great new Mustang, he asks whether everyone else also knows that. There's no value in having the usual information.

Predicting how people will react is major requirement. Everything that is useful is counterintuitive. If you’re not confused, you don’t know what’s going on. None of this is easy, and anyone who thinks it is is stupid. The most uncertain thing in markets at the moment is central bank activity. It’s what you know for certain that just ain’t true that gets you into trouble.

Money is to be made in doing things others aren’t. He believes you can’t make money trading, jumping in and out of stocks or bonds, and trading should only be used to make long-term investing decisions. He only buy bonds which he expects to hold to maturity.

Leverage does not make any investment better. “The more you bet, the more you win when you win, as they say in Las Vegas.” If you would not buy without leverage, a company does not suddenly become a better investment with leverage. A margin call could stop you out, and then you don’t enjoy the recovery, and that’s the worst time. Distressed debt buyers then obtain the recovery.

He never considers himself a futurist. Some people have different skills. It’s hard to be right about the major societal trends, but some people can do it. It should become harder over time to make exceptional returns, but superior investors will still do well.

The first great piece of investment wisdom he learned was that you need to be aware of the pendulum swinging from optimistic to pessimistic. Once everyone thinks improvement will last forever, no price is too high and that’s the worst time to invest.

 

This is general information and the investments may not be suitable as the personal circumstances of any investor are unknown. Cuffelinks accepts no responsibility for the performance of the investments.

 

  •   11 November 2016
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.