Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 456

Betting markets as election predictors

When Scott Morrison called the election for May 21, betting agencies had the Labor Party at $1.33 to form government, with the Coalition at $3.25. That converts to a 75% probability of Labor winning. And even after a diabolical first week of the election campaign for Anthony Albanese, odds eased Labor only slightly out to $1.45, with the Coalition $2.70 at the half-way mark of the campaign.

Now the current odds may be short for Labor, but they were even shorter in 2019, and we all know what happened then.

It was often touted in the media in the lead up to the 2019 election, that Labor was a good thing to form government because they were so short with the bookies. But how good a predictor of election results are betting markets?

Believe it or not, betting agencies are in the business of making money, not predicting outcomes. Their win quotes will be weighted by dollars held for various outcomes. That Labor ended up such a short-priced favourite just days before the election, would have reflected the greater holding in the win pool for a Labor victory. Sportsbet for example, reported that 70% of total money wagered with them, was held for a Labor win.

Now a quote of $1.15 to win reflects an 87% implied probability of winning. And before placing a bet, the punter should weigh up whether that reflects value or not. If he believed the true probability of a Labor win was greater than 87%, he would gladly accept the $1.15 on offer. If not, he should have walked away.

So was Labor’s true probability of winning anywhere near 87% in 2019? When the TAB opened betting on the election in February 2018, they installed Labor favourite at $1.50, an implied winning probability of 67%, with the Coalition at $2.50. 

Labor probably opened favourite for a number of reasons. That the 2016 election result was so unexpectedly close with Labor almost snatching victory. That there was perceived instability within the Coalition with Tony Abbott lurking in the background of a Turnbull government. And that Labor finally had a stable team with a fistful of policies to take to the 2019 election.

Then from that point, things began to get even worse for the Coalition. There was the Barnaby Joyce resignation over a relationship with a former staffer. Then the leadership debacle that saw Malcolm Turnbull ousted and Scott Morrison installed as new PM. Followed by the Wentworth by-election loss, and then the announced exodus of senior Liberal figures, not seeking re-election. Things unravelled fast, and many deemed the Coalition unelectable. Meanwhile, Labor sat back quietly observing the self-destruction.

Consequently, the big bets began to roll in for a Labor win, and its odds tightened with the bookies. Such a trend can often become self-fulfilling, as the prospect of a Labor win attracted more punters chasing seemingly easy money but requiring bigger wagers at short odds for a half decent payout. Meanwhile on the other side of the ledger, the Coalition’s price was blowing out further, becoming attractive only to small time punters prepared to have a nibble, not needing to mortgage the family home for a reasonable reward.

But as the dollar quotes became steadily more lopsided, did the true probabilities shift in tandem? Probably not a lot. Because with the Coalition already at a low base, the probability of them winning surely could not have become much worse, and therefore Labor not much better. In fact to the contrary, things began to slowly turn. 

As they steadily unpicked Labor’s high taxing and high spending agenda, the true probability of a Coalition win began to edge upwards. And Morrison began to display his campaigning skills that had largely been unseen by the electorate. He and his party effectively began to make inroads, slowly willing themselves back into the contest. The polls revealed an improved Coalition two party preferred measure, moving from as far out as 56:44 in Labor’s favour, to just 51:49 days before the election. Which was within the margin of error.

So the true probability of a Coalition win had more than likely increased, and that of Labor’s decreased. But the sheer weight of money for a Labor win could not move its short quote. In fact, it tightened even further in the last weeks of the campaign to that skinny price of $1.15, with the report of one punter waging $1 million on Labor to win. Meanwhile the Coalition’s price drifted out as far as $5.50, equating to just an 18% implied probability of winning. 

In the end, there simply was not enough money to correct the bias in the win pool. Noting also that punters were unlikely to be representative of the electorate, ensuring persistent bias. Momentum however, continued to swing the Coalition’s way, and the rest as they say, is history. 

The thing is in politics, true probabilities can move with sentiment fast, but the betting markets may not have the scope to adjust. Probabilities can be indicative when markets open, but as we have seen, events can quickly cause a disconnect between true and implied probabilities. 

Interestingly, we saw similar results with Donald Trump winning at long odds in the US in 2016. And the Leave vote triumphing over the Remain vote in the Brexit referendum also at long odds in 2016, with about 75% of £40 million bet on the outcome, wagered on Remain. Even though it was revealed later that there were far more individual bets on Leave than Remain, which proved prophetic in hindsight. After all, it makes sense intuitively that numbers of bets as opposed to dollars bet, should be a better predictor of what the electorate is thinking.

So when we accuse bookies of failing to read the political landscape, we should realise that that is not their charter.

 

Tony Dillon is a freelance writer and former actuary. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

10 Comments
David
May 13, 2022

And at the moment Sportsbet have Labor at $1.28 and the Coalition at $4.00. The book is at 98.1% but try to get set to have $2000 on the Coalition and $7813 on Labor

Ramani
May 08, 2022

How could Tony Dillon describe himself as a former actuary? Behaviourally once you are admitted into the club for virtual mortuary technicians there is no opting out. Branded for ever. Many fellows of the UK institute (post nominal: FIA) have a MA in maths making them MAFIA. As in the Sicilian variety, once in you could only be carried out after you move from the living column lx to the dying column dx in the mortality table!

A fellow actuary for life

Tony Dillon
May 08, 2022

Hi Ramani, fair point. It all gets down to terminology I guess. Like, are you practicing or not? I’m not. A quick perusal on google suggests a “former actuary” designation is not uncommon. But I tend to agree, once an actuary always an actuary. By the way, a lot of people think an actuary is a place where dead actors are buried.

Greg C
May 05, 2022

The normalisation of betting through the free advertising these book markers get by having odds for things like elections is disgusting. The exposure my children and grandchildren now have to betting just from on night's television is unbelieveable. Disgusting really.

Jack
May 05, 2022

Just as interesting is bookies paying only $1.70 on Josh Frydenberg holding Kooyong versus $2.05 for Monique Ryan after her impressive showing the the debate. Who would have thought the Libs and the Treasurer could lose such a blue ribbon seat.

Neil Cox
May 05, 2022

When Morrison took leadership of the Libs at the last election, the next day the Libs running at 6 to 1. I put $100 on them to win and scooped. So, the betting markets are not always right. As for this election, I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole.

Alan B
May 05, 2022

I would trust betting agencies more than polling companies. Polls are unreliable and prone to stacking and weighting manipulation. This is because they are no longer conducted on the street or by phone. Now polling companies invite participation on panels to answer questions on a variety of questions. Panel members earn rewards for participation. Obviously panels can be stacked and will attract more people from certain demographics so answers have to be weighed in an effort to get accurate sampling representations by age, gender, ethnicity, location etc. The drawbacks of polling is evident in their consistent unreliability. But the lazy media continues to breathlessly report them.

NeilB
May 04, 2022

So Tony, is there a way of knowing at present the "numbers" of bets made (which you say at the end is a better predictor of what the electorate is thinking) ?

Tony Dillon
May 04, 2022

Hi NeilB, I'm not aware of numbers of bets made, being available information across the various betting agencies in Australia. I do recall post Brexit analysis however, showing that some 70% of individual bets placed were for Leave.

Filip
May 06, 2022

https://www.crikey.com.au/2022/05/05/bookies-punters-pick-teals-llabor-in-key-seats/
55% of bets going to Coalition.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

Reader Survey on the Federal election 2022

How our preferential voting drives the election result

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

16 ASX stocks to buy and hold forever, updated

This time last year, I highlighted 16 ASX stocks that investors could own indefinitely. One year on, I look at whether there should be any changes to the list of stocks as well as which companies are worth buying now. 

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

2025-26 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ABS recently released figures which are used to determine key superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2025. This outlines the rates and thresholds that are changing and those that aren’t.  

Is Gen X ready for retirement?

With the arrival of the new year, the first members of ‘Generation X’ turned 60, marking the start of the MTV generation’s collective journey towards retirement. Are Gen Xers and our retirement system ready for the transition?

Why the $5.4 trillion wealth transfer is a generational tragedy

The intergenerational wealth transfer, largely driven by a housing boom, exacerbates economic inequality, stifles productivity, and impedes social mobility. Solutions lie in addressing the housing problem, not taxing wealth.

What Warren Buffett isn’t saying speaks volumes

Warren Buffett's annual shareholder letter has been fixture for avid investors for decades. In his latest letter, Buffett is reticent on many key topics, but his actions rather than words are sending clear signals to investors.

Latest Updates

Investing

Designing a life, with money to spare

Are you living your life by default or by design? It strikes me that many people are doing the former and living according to others’ expectations of them, leading to poor choices including with their finances.

Investment strategies

A closer look at defensive assets for turbulent times

After the recent market slump, it's a good time to brush up on the defensive asset classes – what they are, why hold them, and how they can both deliver on your goals and increase the reliability of your desired outcomes.

Financial planning

Are lifetime income streams the answer or just the easy way out?

Lately, there's been a push by Government for lifetime income streams as a solution to retirement income challenges. We run the numbers on these products to see whether they deliver on what they promise.

Shares

Is it time to buy the Big Four banks?

The stellar run of the major ASX banks last year left many investors scratching their heads. After a recent share price pullback, has value emerged in these banks, or is it best to steer clear of them?

Investment strategies

The useful role that subordinated debt can play in your portfolio

If you’re struggling to replace the hybrid exposure in your portfolio, you’re not alone. Subordinated debt is an option, and here is a guide on what it is and how it can fit into your investment mix.

Shares

Europe is back and small caps there offer significant opportunities

Trump’s moves on tariffs, defence, and Ukraine, have awoken European Governments after a decade of lethargy. European small cap manager, Alantra Asset Management, says it could herald a new era for the continent.

Shares

Lessons from the rise and fall of founder-led companies

Founder-led companies often attract investors due to leaders' personal stakes and long-term vision. But founder presence alone does not guarantee success, and the challenge is to identify which ones will succeed in the long term.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.