Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 415

Why mega-tech growth are the best ‘value’ stocks in the market

The world’s annual $120 trillion economy increasingly depends on just six mega-tech businesses – Facebook, Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, Amazon, Tencent and Alibaba – to function properly. You would think they would continue to all be obvious inclusions in portfolios but investors today have a menu of reasons to avoid or even sell mega-tech investments.

After a strong 2020, many investors are worried all the 'easy money has been made' – a commonly used phrase we hear in our industry which also suffers from acute hindsight bias. Investors are also worried inflation will drive interest rates higher and compress the earnings multiples of higher-growth businesses.

Mega-tech investments also seem boring now – a surprisingly strong criterion some investors seek to avoid. And, of course, there are the never-ending headlines pointing to regulatory pressures across the sector.

Tech has underperformed year-to-date

Yet our analysis shows that mega-tech stocks not only offer some of the best growth opportunities, but also offer some of the best ‘value’ opportunities in the market today. We see material upside in all six of these mega technology businesses. Given the combination of strong and growing advantages, enormous growth opportunities, and material undervaluation today, we believe these names should form the core of any global equities portfolio.

Investors shouldn’t rotate out of mega-tech to value because mega-tech are value.

Our investment philosophy is to own long-term winning businesses operating in the world’s most attractive markets, without overpaying. These mega-tech businesses meet these criteria in the strongest way and they form the core of our portfolio.

Below we look at the top three reasons why mega-tech stocks are some of today’s best value stocks.

1. Mega-techs have the best businesses … ever?

The first reason is that the business quality of today’s mega-techs is among the highest that humans have ever created. They dominate global data, benefit from enormous ecosystems, and have superior economics and scale. The huge cash flows and profits these businesses generate can be reinvested in new business opportunities, spurring fresh rounds of growth. These mega-techs all have a vast array of high-probability growth options in enormous new TAMs (total addressable markets).

Take Facebook, for example. More than 3 billion members log in and spend significant time each month on its platforms. It is unquestionably the world’s best platform for marketers to reach customers. Facebook’s revenues and earnings have been largely driven by the company monetising around 10 million businesses who pay for the company’s digital marketing services. But approximately 200 million businesses use Facebook today, as well as another 200 million ‘creators’.

Facebook is now investing heavily in its conversion and monetisation capabilities, particularly in eCommerce and creator monetisation tools. This will unlock the enormous latent revenue opportunity of these currently non-paying businesses and creators. It gives us great confidence that Facebook’s future revenue and earnings power will be multiples of its current levels.

Facebook: Only a tiny fraction of customers monetise today

Alphabet is also leveraging its advantages in data, talent and time to become a clear global leader in artificial intelligence (AI), which will not only strengthen its existing advantages in its core advertising, cloud and productivity businesses, but will also create brand new businesses, such as Verily which is leveraging Alphabet’s data advantages to solve problems in life sciences and healthcare.

And, of course, one of the biggest areas of future mega-tech growth is the cloud. Amazon, Microsoft and Alphabet, along with Alibaba and Tencent in China, dominate the cloud. Microsoft CEO, Satya Nadella, estimates there will be approximately $8 trillion in incremental IT spend each year globally by 2030, of which cloud-based services and applications will no doubt claim the lion’s share. For the leading cloud providers, their advantages in scale, data and customer captivity will only continue to strengthen over time. Said another way, this is a space for which enormous growth is largely assured and for which the winners have already been defined today. This means that the future revenues and earnings power of these businesses will also be multiples of their current levels.

2. Inflation concerns are overdone

The second reason mega-tech provides fantastic value is that investors are too worried about inflation and what that could mean for interest rates and valuations. Over the first six months of this year, equities in the technology sector have underperformed the broader market largely because investors feared rising rates would slash tech valuations.

We believe those fears and the sell-off are overdone. While we note the same strong headline inflation numbers as everyone else, we struggle to see an extended acceleration in core inflation.

For a start, over the short-term, there remains significant slack in the labour markets relative to pre-pandemic levels, which should limit the acceleration in wage growth. Secondly, our analysis of Chinese credit growth shows a clear and substantial slowing, which is a strong leading indicator for cooling global commodities demand growth over the next 6-12 months.

We also expect structural disinflationary forces – such as ageing populations, labour-disrupting automation technologies and global corporate and government indebtedness – to persist for decades.

Indebtedness: The upward trend has accelerated

But something that has not yet been tested in any meaningful way is the pricing power of our mega-tech businesses. Should these businesses find it easy to increase their prices in an inflationary environment, then this goes some way to insulating investors from the negative effects of inflation. We believe the latent pricing power in these businesses is likely very strong – and in some cases, extraordinarily so.

Take Microsoft 365, for example – arguably one of the most mission-critical software packages upon which many hundreds of millions of employees are reliant each day. This costs just US$32/month, vastly below any reasonable estimate for the value it adds, strongly supporting our latent pricing power hypothesis.

3. Current valuations are too conservative

The final reason that mega-tech stocks are great value is their attractive valuations. Our analysis shows that the expectations baked into the current stock prices of our big-tech names are far too conservative.

  • In the case of three dominant US cloud providers, Amazon, Microsoft and Alphabet, for example, their implied collective annual cloud revenues by 2030 are in the order of just $650 billion higher than current levels, according to consensus estimates. This is a tiny fraction of the $8 trillion increment that Microsoft CEO Nadella expects to accrue to the tech space over the next decade. If Nadella’s forecast above is even remotely accurate, then these cloud providers will see much higher revenues (and earnings) in 2030 than what is currently being implied by consensus estimates.

  • Next, consider Tencent and Alibaba, the latter of which has of course suffered greatly from the Jack Ma saga, with the billionaire Alibaba founder’s fintech Ant Group IPO pulled at the last minute and with Ma reportedly under serious pressure from Chinese regulators and Government. In both cases, despite owning some of the most valuable data ecosystems in China and South-East Asia – including being the two dominant cloud providers on the Mainland – their respective stock prices imply very conservative sets of expectations. Said another way, if revenue growth for these businesses were to fall from healthy-double-digits, to just single-digits by 2025, an investor today would still make money, based on Montaka’s analysis.

  • And finally, the biggest head-scratcher of them all is Facebook, which is priced at a forward earnings multiple of just 14x. Some of the businesses trading at a higher multiple than this today include Australia’s Wesfarmers, Scentre Group, and plumbing parts supplier, Reece. At the current stock price, the market is effectively giving investors all of the upside from eCommerce, the monetisation of the creator economy, WhatsApp, Messenger and Reels, as well as Facebook’s growth in VR/AR for free!

Spectacular potential

As the global economy grows, we are all becoming even more dependent on the highest-quality mega-tech winners.

Today, the collective revenues of these six businesses account for just 1% of global GDP. By 2030, global GDP will probably be around $160 trillion per annum, and these businesses will account for a much larger share than today.

For the patient investor who can look through the short-term noise, we believe these businesses are strong candidates to form the core of any global equities portfolio today. At Montaka, we will continue to own these businesses in size while their prices make sense. Patiently owning the winning businesses in the world’s most attractive industries without overpaying is the way Montaka believes in safely compounding capital over the long term.

 

Andrew Macken is Chief Investment Officer at Montaka Global Investments. This article is general information and is based on an understanding of current legislation.

 

  •   7 July 2021
  • 7
  •      
  •   
7 Comments
Richard
July 07, 2021

I wholeheartedly agree with this article's sentiments. The valuations of these gigantic companies is not stretched at all - they are money making machines.

Greg
July 07, 2021

When you look at their share prices from five years ago until now, they have all achieved over 150% growth in share prices.
They are money making machines, however the average person could not afford to invest in those companies.

John
July 07, 2021

While I agree with your sentiment 100% you need to be careful when calling these 'tech' companies and then looking at that sector's returns to justify part of your thesis. Only one of the companies is in the Technology Sector.

Amazon/Ali Baba - Consumer Discretionary
Alphabet/Tencent/Facebook - Telecommunications (or Communication Services as it is called now)
Actually only Microsoft, from your examples, is a 'Tech' company.

The Technology Sector is weighed down by 'old' tech.

Joey
July 07, 2021

Why do these articles never include Twitter. It seems the favourite ways to communicate for hundreds of millions of people, and its share price has risen a lot lately. Are they struggling to monetise?

George
July 08, 2021

I agree with this analysis, these are six of the greatest ever companies. So why not just buy all six directly, the problem with holding them via a fund is all sort of other stuff gets thrown in.

Lee
July 10, 2021

And of course the toxic sludge of fake news, massive censorship (even of experts in their field around C19 and associated experimental therapies silenced/banned) spewing forth from some of these bigger than god behemoth brands, is not at all an issue. Wow.

Doug
July 10, 2021

Another tech company is ZOOM..... that showed a capacity for lateral thing that resulted in a great capacity for lateral thinking contributing to our communications during C19. Further development of their systems expertise should not only protect this valuable resource for our communications generally, but also provide future dividends to it's shareholders. It should be up there.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The ‘cosmic’ forces leading the US to Modern Monetary Theory

Can quantitative tightening help the Fed fight inflation?

Policy pincers in Australia and the US

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.