Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 591

Australian shares struggle as 2020s reach halfway point

Yes, it’s halfway through the 2020s decade already! Time flies.

The decade started out with governments everywhere locking citizens in their homes and out of their businesses and schools for months on end, then they cut interest rates to zero and racked up war-time like debts spraying free money around everywhere, fuelling speculative bubbles in everything from housing to meme stocks, cryptos and ‘NFTs’, then we get a massive inflation spike (Duh!), followed by savage rate hikes – and before you know, it the decade is half over.

Meanwhile, Trump started out in the White House, then out, then sort of in, then really out, and now nearly back in again.

Time to take a look at half-time scores for investment markets. First up - the Australian share market.

The picture is not good:

  • Aussie shares are having a below-average decade so far (and below other markets including the US).
  • It has remained below average all decade – after a poor start with the 2020 Covid lockdowns.
  • But all is not lost – some past decades also started out slow but ended up with good full decade returns.
  • There is plenty of time left this decade for the next big speculative boom to lift the share market – history is on our side.

This chart shows nominal total returns from the broad Australian share market per decade since 1900. (‘Nominal’ means not adjusted for inflation. ‘Total returns’ means price gains/losses plus dividends reinvested).

To the right of the chart are the average annualised returns per decade sorted from best decade (1980s) to worst (1970s). The average decade return has been 10.4% pa (dotted black line), and the current decade is running below that at 9.2% pa at half-time (solid black line).

Best decades

By far the best decade for the Aussie share market was the 1980s, with returns averaging 17.1% pa or a total gain of 409% for the decade. It started out strongly with the early 1980s property construction and mining booms, but those booms quickly collapsed in the 1981-83 recession after cash rates were hiked to 20% to attack inflation running at 12%.

Our early 1980s recession was milder than the US inflation-busting Volcker recessions because the government and RBA opted not to attack inflation with interest rates but use the Accord process instead.

In the mid-1980s, we had an extraordinary speculative boom driven by Labor’s raft of economic reforms, including floating the dollar, deregulating capital markets, interest rates, and banks. This fuelled a wild speculative lending and take-over boom that collapsed sharply in the October 1987 crash, but even after the overall market dropped by 50% in the crash, it was still much higher than when the boom started. Essentially the market doubled, then halved again in a little over a year in 1986-87.

At the end of the 1980s decade following the 1987 crash, the deregulated banks survived but switched from mad lending on crazy take-over deals in the mid-1980s, to mad lending on crazy property construction deals in the late 1980s. This boom would also collapse of course, but that was in a new decade – the 1990s.

The 1990s was also a very good decade for the local share market, with returns averaging 11.1% pa, or 188% in total. It started out poorly with the 1990-91 recession and 1992-93 bank crisis caused by the orgy of bad lending in the 1980s coming home to roost. However, despite this poor start, the 1990s turned out to be a very good decade, thanks to the late 1990s ‘dot-com’ boom. That boom also collapsed, of course, but the ‘2001-02’ tech wreck was in a new decade.

Worst decades

The worst decade for Australian shares since Federation was the 1970s, with total returns averaging just 6.6% pa, or 89% in total. (Actually the 1890s was even worse, but that's another story for another day)

The 1970s started out badly with the early 1970s collapse of the wild late-1960s speculative mining boom. Then things went from bad to worse with spiralling inflation and the Whitlam government’s chaos and spending sprees. The share market collapsed in the 1973-74 credit crunch, and it recovered only weakly by the end of the ‘stagflation’ decade.

After the 1970s, the next worst decade for Australian share market was the 2010s. Unlike the 1970s, there were no major crashes during the 2010s decade, just a succession of minor crises – ‘Greece 1’ in 2010, ‘Greece 2’ and the US debt downgrade crisis in 2011, the China slowdown and commodities collapse in 2014-5, and the US rate hike/recession scare in 2018. Overall, a very poor decade with returns of just 7.9% pa, or 113% in total.

2020s at half time?

At the half-way point in the current decade, the overall Aussie share market has returned and average of 9.2% per year. This is below the overall average return of 10.4% pa since 1900.

If the last decade (the 2010s) was a poor decade, and the current one is poor so far, can we have two poor decades in a row? Sure. The 1930s and 1940s were both poor decades with below-average returns. The 2000s and 2010s were also both poor decades with below average returns. Unfortunately, there is no magic rule that says that one poor decade will be followed by above-average returns next decade.

All is not lost

The fact that we have had a poor first half does not necessarily mean that it will end up being a poor decade overall. There were several times in the past when a poor first half decade turned into an above-average full decade. For example:

  • The 1900s decade was at a similar below-average level at half-time, thanks to severe drought in the early years, but still ended up returning an above-average 11.7% pa for the full decade. The drought ended and we had a strong revival of wool and wheat in the latter years.
  • The 1950s decade had a worse first half than we are now in the 2020s, with the Korean War inflation spike and recession in the early years but ended up returning a very strong 13.2% pa for the full decade. The inflation spike was resolved, and a consumer finance boom boosted the market in the late 1950s (but collapsed in the early 1960s).
  • The 1960s decade also had a worse first half than the 2020s but ended up returning 11.6% pa for the full decade, thanks to the wild late-1960s speculative mining boom.
  • The 1990s decade also had a worse first half than the 2020s, with the first half marred by the 1990-1 recession and 1992-3 bank crisis. But the 1990s decade ended up returning 11.1% pa for the full decade, thanks to the late 1990s ‘dot-com’ boom (which collapsed in early 2000s).

We need another speculative boom

Do you see a common pattern here? It is a strange phenomenon that speculative booms have tended to occur in the latter part of decades. For example: housing, suburbanisation, and motor cars in the late 1920s, gold in the late 1930s, consumer finance in the late 1950s, mining in the late 1960s, construction and mining in the late 1970s, take-overs, housing, and construction in the late 1980s, ‘dot-com’ stocks in the late 1990s, mining in the mid-late 2000s.

Each of these booms collapsed of course – mostly at the end of the decade or early in the new decade.

Where are we now?

So far in the 2020s decade, Australia has largely missed out on the current US-led social media /AI boom (hence the relatively poor returns here) – but we have another half a decade to find the next boom.

The good news is that humans have a never-ending ability to come up with new ideas to fuel the next speculative boom. They always eventually collapse, but there is still a good chance the next boom will power the local share market to good returns by the end of the current decade.

There is ALWAYS another speculative boom - I just don’t know what it will be yet.

Pricing expensive

Although the first half of this decade has been below average, the local share market is at very expensive levels at present. Share prices have risen by below average levels so far this decade, but aggregate profits and dividends have been even weaker. Consequently, the current market is very expensive relative to aggregate profits, dividends, book values, and returns on equity.

The current poor share price performance this decade is masking an even weaker performance of the local economy, profits, and dividends.

The problem is that expensive pricing on fundamentals usually means below average returns ahead. Therefore, if the market is going to surge ahead and end up with an average (or better than average) decade from the current halfway point, it will need to be an almighty speculative boom in the next few years to do the job.

Fortunately, our market has a history of wild speculative booms that have run well ahead of fundamentals, so there is no reason that this regular pattern will end now. We just need another one soon.

Huge variation in returns in different decades

This chart highlights the huge variations in returns in different decades. Finance textbooks say that 10 years is ‘long-term’, and share funds always warn potential investors that the minimum holding period for shares is 7-10 years.

The implication is that if you should be prepared to hold for a minimum of 7-10 years because the share market is volatile - ie result in very different outcomes over shorter holding periods. The problem is that the outcomes are very different even over 10 year holding periods, like the different decades on the chart.

Time in the market’ only works if you pick the right decade/s

The chart shows that even 10 years is a not nearly long enough to reduce the variability of returns and provide investors with any degree of confidence that a 10-year holding period will result in returns mor or less around the long term average. Unfortunately, in the real world, the share market can generate returns well below average (or well above average) even for 20 year holding periods or more sometimes.

If you are relying on ‘time in the market’, then much of it comes down to pure luck – when you happen to have been born – which more or less determines when you start working and investing, and when you retire.

For example – if you happened to retire at the start of the 1930s or at the start of the 2000s with a pot of money to fund your lifestyle, you would have immediately faced two decades of very poor returns (lower lifestyles and/or run out of money sooner) in both cases.

But if you happened to retire at the start of the 1950s or at the start of the 1980s, then would have faced 20 years of significantly above average returns (better lifestyles and/or larger legacy) in each case.

That’s the great lottery of birth, but it’s too reliant on luck for my liking.

 

Ashley Owen, CFA is Founder and Principal of OwenAnalytics. Ashley is a well-known Australian market commentator with over 40 years’ experience. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual. You can subscribe to OwenAnalytics Newsletter here. Original article is here: We're half-way through the 2020s decade! Here's the half-time score check on Aussie shares.

 

9 Comments
Philip - Perth
December 21, 2024

I look forward to this same article next year, when we actually reach the 'half-way mark' for the 2020s, which of course will be 5 years after it started, on Jan 1 2021. If our forefathers could get this simple arithmetic right, back on the first day of the 20th Century (Jan 1 1901) when they started up this country surely those who purport to be mathematicall inclined (researchers in markets) can do that too? 2020 was the last year of the previous decade NOT the first year of this one, so you can remove that year from your statistical study of the 2020s - and improve the result. Win/win!

ashley owen
December 20, 2024

hi steve - looks like you have a pretty good approach. Holding a lot of cash is a drag on returns (esp after tax + inflation) but it ultimately depends on how much income you need for how long, etc which is different in every case of course. Your approach to ETFs also sounds healthy - to get different slices of the market in different conditions. Of the 346 ETFs on the ASX there are a couple of dozen that can be quite useful. Check out my owenanalytics.com.au website - I post my actual long term ETF portfolio - what's in it and why (not 'advice' of course).
cheers
ao

Dudley
December 21, 2024

"100% cash is safe as a dodo in the long run": Death is safe as a dodo in the long run.

"Holding a lot of cash is a drag on returns (esp after tax + inflation) but it ultimately depends on how much income you need for how long":

The minimum earn rate depends on how long the cash must last, the burn rate, the present capital and the future capital:

Example; to 92, from 77, earn (= Age Pension) $43,752.80, present capital $5,000,000, future capital $1,000,000:
= RATE((92.0 - 77.0), 43752.80, -5000000, 1000000, 0)
= -8.20% / y real.
= (1 + -8.2%) * (1 + 3%) - 1
= -5.45% / y nominal.

What the likelihood of losing more than 5.45% / y on cash averaged over the investment period?

Another;
= RATE((92.0 - 77.0), 43752.80, -2000000, 1000000, 0)
= -1.51% / y real.

One more;
= RATE((92 - 77), 43752.8, -1000000, 1000000, 0)
= 4.38% / y real.
Likelihood of averaging 4.38% / y on cash? Buckley's.

Dudley
December 21, 2024

Err; burn rate (= Age Pension) $43,752.80

CC
December 19, 2024

I'm not sure what this article is telling us to do.
If " time in the market" is not enough, and it's mostly about luck and what year you were born or retired, then what are you suggesting we do ?

ashley owen
December 20, 2024

good questions, CC!
unfortunately the trusty old 'time in the market' does have a big element of luck. For accumulators (eg in working life contributing regularly in or out of super) then dollar cost averaging does reduce some of the luck element. But for retirees not contributing, it really does depend a lot on luck. For example, using the standard 4% 'safe withdrawal rate' rule (ie capital needs to be 25 times your annual expense budget) - that only applies if markets are fairly priced at the start. At the moment, share markets are horribly over-priced, so if you have 25 times your spending budget that is being artificially and temporarily inflated by the current market over-pricing. You are going to need a lot more than 25 times. So the lesson is - it can be dangerous to just trust the market, and remain passive on asset allocation. Unfortunately, you need to take a view on market valuations and adjust asset allocation (and withdrawal rates) accordingly.
hope this helps!
cheers
ao

Steve
December 19, 2024

Not really inspiring. The market has been (just slightly) below average, but even that has been from over-pricing. Our market is dominated by mature, slow growing businesses (can CBA's price keep defying gravity?) and commodities like iron ore may face a tough road if African ore does eventuate (look what Indonesia has done to nickel). Coal, gas etc, where are they going in the next 5 years? These are the main export drivers of our economy for cripes sake. If Labor get re-elected on Green preferences and energy costs continue to climb, expect manufacturing to shrink even more. Best bet? International stocks, and a collapsing AUD will give them some extra oomph.

ashley owen
December 20, 2024

yes steve, not absolutely inspring! You correctly highlighted the local ASX's heavy weighting to over-priced banks and volatile China-dependent miners. It has been good to favour US/global markets + being un-hedged on the AUD has been good with the declining Aussie dollar. My main message is to not fall into the trap of blindly trusting 'set-&-forget', 'time-in-the-market' dogma. Sounds good in theory but can go wrong in practice. You really need to be vigilant on pricing, FX hedge ratios on foreign shares, asset allocation, etc.
Best of luck in 2025!
ao

Steve
December 20, 2024

Of course nothing is perfect and no-one has a crystal ball. I am basically 30% domestic shares, 30% international and 40% bonds/cash (this latter allocation increased about 10% recently due to the frothiness of stocks). The primary aim is to have the income from this mix roughly cover my expenses so the need to sell in a down market is lessened. Like businesses, cash flow is king. The downside to high international shares is less cash income (of course you can sell some but such pro-active measures are always harder to time). Further, and I might be a marketing sucker but I feel the "quality" approach (eg low debt, high ROE etc) should cushion any downside so ETF's like MOAT & QUAL as well as AQLT & MVW domestically (to reduce the overweightness' of the banks & miners) I hope will fall less and recover quicker than straight market cap indexes. But at the end of the day 100% cash is safe as a dodo in the long run, the only certainty there is you WILL lose money over time. I'm with Peter Thornhill on that subject. Which actually makes it much easier. Which decade you are born in matters for sure, I got to see Parramatta win a few premierships!

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Why caution is needed in Aussie small companies

5 big calls for 2024

Why the ASX 200 has gone nowhere in 16 years

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Vale Graham Hand

It’s with heavy hearts that we announce Firstlinks’ co-founder and former Managing Editor, Graham Hand, has died aged 66. Graham was a legendary figure in the finance industry and here are three tributes to him.

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, one year on

Last year, I wrote an article suggesting returns from ASX stocks would trample those from housing over the next decade. One year later, this is an update on how that forecast is going and what's changed since.

Avoiding wealth transfer pitfalls

Australia is in the early throes of an intergenerational wealth transfer worth an estimated $3.5 trillion. Here's a case study highlighting some of the challenges with transferring wealth between generations.

Taxpayers betrayed by Future Fund debacle

The Future Fund's original purpose was to meet the unfunded liabilities of Commonwealth defined benefit schemes. These liabilities have ballooned to an estimated $290 billion and taxpayers continue to be treated like fools.

Australia’s shameful super gap

ASFA provides a key guide for how much you will need to live on in retirement. Unfortunately it has many deficiencies, and the averages don't tell the full story of the growing gender superannuation gap.

Looking beyond banks for dividend income

The Big Four banks have had an extraordinary run and it’s left income investors with a conundrum: to stick with them even though they now offer relatively low dividend yields and limited growth prospects or to look elsewhere.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

9 lessons from 2024

Key lessons include expensive stocks can always get more expensive, Bitcoin is our tulip mania, follow the smart money, the young are coming with pitchforks on housing, and the importance of staying invested.

Investment strategies

Time to announce the X-factor for 2024

What is the X-factor - the largely unexpected influence that wasn’t thought about when the year began but came from left field to have powerful effects on investment returns - for 2024? It's time to select the winner.

Shares

Australian shares struggle as 2020s reach halfway point

It’s halfway through the 2020s decade and time to get a scorecheck on the Australian stock market. The picture isn't pretty as Aussie shares are having a below-average decade so far, though history shows that all is not lost.

Shares

Is FOMO overruling investment basics?

Four years ago, we introduced our 'bubbles' chart to show how the market had become concentrated in one type of stock and one view of the future. This looks at what, if anything, has changed, and what it means for investors.

Shares

Is Medibank Private a bargain?

Regulatory tensions have weighed on Medibank's share price though it's unlikely that the government will step in and prop up private hospitals. This creates an opportunity to invest in Australia’s largest health insurer.

Shares

Negative correlations, positive allocations

A nascent theme today is that the inverse correlation between bonds and stocks has returned as inflation and economic growth moderate. This broadens the potential for risk-adjusted returns in multi-asset portfolios.

Retirement

The secret to a good retirement

An Australian anthropologist studying Japanese seniors has come to a counter-intuitive conclusion to what makes for a great retirement: she suggests the seeds may be found in how we approach our working years.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.