Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 474

The data doesn't lie: dividends on Resources versus Industrials

(Editor's introduction: Peter Thornhill is well-known to our readers for advocating a multi-decade investment strategy based on the long-term merits of industrial companies for income. For example, to show his consistency over time, some of his previous articles in Firstlinks are here and here and here. In this short update, he again checks the long-term return from industrial shares, but this time, he makes the comparison with resource stocks. He argues that for investors with the right risk capacity and investment horizon, there's only one place to invest).

***

The current resource bubble and the flow of healthy dividends will no doubt have many investors salivating. Whilst my long-term charts are based on calendar year, this article looks at the last three financial years to bring my analysis up-to-date.

The table below takes 2019 as the starting point and looks at the dividend changes for financial years ending 30 June 2020, 2021 and 2022 for Industrials, Resources and the All Ordinaries.

Resource dividends come and go

Clearly, the impact of Covid effected industrial companies as dividends were suspended or reduced during this unsettling period, while the spectacular jump in resource dividends was driven by surging prices and demand for commodities.

Resource bubbles are a fact of life and jolly fun for speculators, but we must not lose sight of the longer-term impact. Index funds will have been selling industrials to buy resource stocks and when the bubble bursts, they will be selling resources to buy back the industrials. I wait to see the impact on distributions from these index funds post the change.

The charts below cover the last 41 years of performance for the price and accumulation indices. A picture is worth a thousand words!

Digging stuff out of the ground is all well and good but the real value add comes from the manufacturing, intellectual and technological inputs, not labour.

 

Peter Thornhill is a financial commentator, author, public speaker and Principal of Motivated Money. He runs full-day courses explaining his approach to investing "in the vain hope that not everyone is frozen with fear".

Peter extends his thanks to Angus Gluskie, CEO of Whitefield, for his assistance with the data.

This article is general in nature and does not constitute or convey specific or professional advice. Share markets can be volatile in the short term and investors holding a portfolio of shares will need to tolerate short-term losses and focus on a long-term horizon, and consider financial advice.

 

15 Comments
Steve
September 10, 2022

the anti-woke Coal & Energy stocks are pumping it currently. Even Buffett has loaded up.

CC
September 10, 2022

yes and in the future our great grandchildren will be so pleased that we caused so much damage to the world in the pursuit of quick money....

SMSF Trustee
September 10, 2022

CC the mining and use of fossil fuels has never been about quick money. Very much a long term game for those businesses. And fir society it's been about driving industries for long term growth, employment etc AND for keeping us warm in winter.

The arguments in favour of backing away - perhaps rapidly - from fossil fuels are mostly well-made, but yours isn't one of them. Focus instead on arguing for a better long-term future using renewable, which are becoming cheaper and more effective at carrying base loads and achieving the economic and social goals that fossil fuels have traditionally aimed for. Then you won't sound like just a ranting left-winger.

Truth
September 09, 2022

RBA has resources as higher. Stop cherry picking please. Over the long run, the different industrial sectors have generally performed quite similarly, although there have been periods of over and underperformance (Figure 2) https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/2019/2019-04/australian-equity-market-facts-1917-2019.html

CC
September 10, 2022

Truth, that's an excellent article, thanks for sharing

James
September 07, 2022

There's no harm in holding some BHP, WDS, RIO, MIN, PBS etc for dividends, as part of a well diversified portfolio, especially for when the resource cycle is doing well and spitting out cash! In fact many LIC's (ARGO, AFI, BKI) do, the exception being WHF. Then again WHF also owns a lot of AREIT's which aren't always a good sector to be in! Moderation in all things perhaps? It's not black and white!

C
September 07, 2022

Agree. And the XMJ materials index has far outperformed the XPJ property index over the past 20 years, XMJ up over 300% versus less than 10% for the XPJ !!

michael
September 07, 2022

The chart my online broker produces says XMJ has gone from 10000 to 15500 over the last 10 yrs.
XPJ has gone from 940 to 1360.

Thats 55% for mining & 44% for REIT.

C
September 08, 2022

Michael, have a look at the 20 year comparison. XPJ absolutely slaughtered by the GFC

C
September 07, 2022

The world is a very different place than it was in the 80s and 90s. Back then mining stocks paid little if any dividends. The golden era for banks dividend growth driven by credit growth appears over. The geopolitical climate has created supply chain disruptions, rising inflation and commodity price growth which benefits resource companies. There is definitely some place in share portfolios for the better quality mining companies both for capital growth and dividends. Note that shareholders in MIN ( Mineral resources ) have earned over 25% annual average compound growth since the company listed almost 20 years ago, and BHP dividends over the past decade have more than paid for share purchase I made in 2005.

SMSF Trustee
September 07, 2022

Peter, how is that index funds will be doing that buying and selling? They don't trade the markets like that, they just hold what they have. So when resources run faster than industrials their holding as a % in resources will increase, yes. But not because they're buying at the top, they're just sitting on what the market is doing. If they get funds inflow then they will invest a little bit more in resources than they would have before the run up, but they're also buying industrials. It's not like they follow the momentum and only buy the better performing stocks at the time. That was an unwarranted throwaway line.

Jeremy
September 07, 2022

Correct, they only buy and sell when the index composition changes due to stocks entering or exiting or corporate events such as capital raising.

Geoff Burgess
September 07, 2022

Whilst a picture may be worth a thousand words, pictures can also be misleading. If the graphs had started in 2000 rather than 1979, the relativities might well be quite different. It all depends on the start date.

David
September 08, 2022

True. But how about if you started at 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010?

I was looking on the chart for that point too, and found it.

Data like this always depends upon start and end dates and you can always pick a data set to suit whatever point you're making. Thornhill's reasons for starting at 1979 have been publicised before.

When working out my own investment strategy I ran modelling across different start and end dates as above, to see what happened. It's instructive.

Michael Toal
September 07, 2022

Fascinating short term information Peter

 

Leave a Comment:


RELATED ARTICLES

Follow the market trajectory and stop the usual mistakes

The best strategy to build income for life

The familiar story on dividends, plus predictions for 2023

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The nuts and bolts of family trusts

There are well over 800,000 family trusts in Australia, controlling more than $3 trillion of assets. Here's a guide on whether a family trust may have a place in your individual investment strategy.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 581 with weekend update

A recent industry event made me realise that a 30 year old investing trend could still have serious legs. Could it eventually pose a threat to two of Australia's biggest companies?

  • 10 October 2024

Preserving wealth through generations is hard

How have so many wealthy families through history managed to squander their fortunes? This looks at the lessons from these families and offers several solutions to making and keeping money over the long-term.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 583

Investing guru Howard Marks says he had two epiphanies while visiting Australia recently: the two major asset classes aren’t what you think they are, and one key decision matters above all else when building portfolios.

  • 24 October 2024

The quirks of retirement planning with an age gap

A big age gap can make it harder to find a solution that works for both partners – financially and otherwise. Having a frank conversation about the future, and having it as early as possible, is essential.

A big win for bank customers against scammers

A recent ruling from The Australian Financial Complaints Authority may herald a new era for financial scams. For the first time, a bank is being forced to reimburse a customer for the amount they were scammed.

Latest Updates

Risk management

A big win for bank customers against scammers

A recent ruling from The Australian Financial Complaints Authority may herald a new era for financial scams. For the first time, a bank is being forced to reimburse a customer for the amount they were scammed.

Planning

The gentle art of death cleaning

Most of us don't want to think about death. But there is a compelling reason why we do need to plan ahead, and that's because leaving our loved ones with a mess - financial or otherwise - is not how we want them to remember us.

Property

Why has nothing worked to fix Australia's housing mess?

Why has a succession of inquiries and reports, along with a plethora of academic papers, not led to effective action to improve housing affordability? Because the work has been aimless and unsupported by a national consensus.

Investment strategies

How to find big winners in the energy transition

The received wisdom that investors should “take a long-term view” is as well-worn as it is simplistic. Because while the long run matters, when it comes transition materials, there’s also a strong case for a bit of constructive myopia.

Economics

A Nobel Prize for work on why nations succeed and fail

The 2024 Nobel Prize in Economics has been awarded to three US-based economists who examined the advantages of democracy and the rule of law, and why they are strong in some countries and not others.

Gold

Gold: trustless, rustless, shiny, and tiny

While gold can create divisive views - Buffett called it a valueless pet rock - this assesses its place in portfolios from a supply-demand standpoint and versus currencies. Both angles suggest some exposure to gold is prudent.

Infrastructure

How will the US election impact energy infrastructure?

The US election is not far away and the result will have a key bearing on a host of markets and sectors. Here's a look at the possible ramifications for the global energy infrastructure industry, and the opportunities and risks.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.