Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 607

The state of women's wealth in Australia

Discussions about the gender wealth gap in Australia often centre on superannuation yet it’s not as simple as a shortfall in super contributions. A closer look at the numbers reveals a more complex picture, with broader economic and behavioural factors at play.

Just-released Finder research 'The State of Women’s Wealth - April 2025' shows that the average Australian woman has $428,000 in net wealth - an impressive figure on its own. However, the average Australian man holds $597,000, meaning men have 40% more wealth than women. This disparity is because men’s wealth has grown faster in recent years. This is due to the exceptional performance of Australian property market and global sharemarkets over the past five years, both of which are dominated by male investors.


Rounded to the nearest 1,000. Source: Finder Consumer Sentiment

As covered previously in Firstlinks, the gender super gap is a systemic issue driven by a range of structural factors, including:

  • Unpaid caregiving responsibilities
  • Higher rates of part-time and casual work
  • Career interruptions due to parental leave and caring duties
  • Occupational segregation, where women are overrepresented in lower-paying industries
  • Limited access to leadership roles and promotions
  • Bias and discrimination in hiring, pay negotiations, and workplace policies

Another revealing factor in the wealth gap is property ownership. Among Gen Z Australians, 48% of men own a home compared to just 33% of women. Furthermore, 18% of Gen Z men own their home outright—double the 9% of women in the same cohort. For millennials, the disparity continues. While men and women are almost equally likely to have a mortgage (45% vs 43%), men are 50% more likely to own their home outright (15% vs 10%). Given that property is one of the most significant wealth-building assets in Australia, the lower homeownership rates among women have long-term financial implications.

Beyond property, investment trends also play a role. Studies have consistently shown that men are more likely to invest in equities and take on higher-risk, higher-return investments. Women, by contrast, tend to favour lower-risk assets, which, over time, can result in lower overall returns.

Let’s dive into what the wealth gap looks like across different life stages.

Childhood and adolescence

Recent findings from Finder’s Parenting Report suggest that boys receive more pocket money than girls, earning an average of $10.30 per week compared to $7.50. Over a year, that’s a difference of $145.60. Boys tend to be paid for outdoor chores like mowing the lawn, while girls are expected to complete unpaid “indoor” work, such as tidying up. Experts also note fathers are more likely to discuss money with their sons, while mothers talk to their daughters about financial matters with less confidence.

Interestingly, the biggest gender gap in superannuation balances occurs in adolescence, with the average young male holding $11,710 in super, while the average young female has just $7,455—a difference of 57%. A closer look at employment data reveals why; young men are more likely to work in full-time roles or enter trades straight out of school, whereas young women are more likely to pursue higher education. Finder’s Consumer Sentiment Tracker shows that 25% of 18–20-year-old men have a full-time job, compared to just 15% of women.

Studying/starting a career

According to QILT data, salaries between men and women within six months of finishing university remain close, with male graduates earning just 2% more than their female counterparts. Yet within three years, this pay gap widens to 10%. What causes this shift? While industry selection plays a role (with more men entering higher-paying fields like engineering), differences in salary negotiation and career advancement opportunities may also be contributing factors.

Finder’s research highlights that men are more likely to request a pay rise, with 24% of men negotiating for higher wages compared to just 14% of women. Even when both genders ask for a raise, men receive an average pay bump of $4,000, whereas women receive just $2,424—almost half. Additionally, men are 33% more likely to actually receive the pay rise they request, according to the report “Do Women Ask?”.

Participation at senior levels – and receiving commensurate pay – is a complex topic, but with simple data points. The Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) reports that while women make up 51% of the workforce, they hold only 32.5% of key management positions and just 19.4% of CEO roles. Are women not in senior roles because of that common argument that men are better negotiation capabilities? Or is it a lack of opportunity in certain industries? Or intrinsic bias from hiring managers? Perhaps a combination of all these but consequently, women, on average, retire with significantly less wealth than men.

Motherhood and early career

A generation ago, having children didn’t carry the same financial weight it does today. With the rising cost of living and the need for dual incomes, the decision to start a family now has lasting financial consequences—especially for women.

Finder’s report 'The State of Women’s Wealth' shows women continue to take the vast majority of parental leave, accounting for 83% of all primary carer leave used. Government support has increased in response; paid parental leave will rise to $23,810.80 over six months by July 2026, and for the first time, superannuation contributions will also be included. This will help reduce the long-term financial impact of career breaks, as women currently lose an estimated $4,580 in super contributions for each child which grows to $46,979 come retirement.


Split even: both partners take 6.45 months of annual leave and are paid for 2.2 months of this by their employer
Paid leave: women take 9.1 months of leave and are paid for 2.2 months of this by their employer
Unpaid leave: women take 9.1 months of leave and do not receive any paid leave from their employer
Source: Finder Consumer Sentiment Tracker

They also forego $4,906 of income, making it a total of $91,885 of superannuation they have missed out on by retirement. By contrast, men lose just $11,136 ($5,693 in superannuation come retirement + $5,442 in income lost).

Beyond lost wages, mothers continue to shoulder the bulk of unpaid household labour:

  • 34% of women say they handle almost all household duties, compared to just 10% of men
  • 63% of women take on at least 75% of the chores, while only 23% of men do the same
  • 12% of women say their careers have been impacted by household responsibilities, compared to just 6% of men

Career progression or midlife

Life between your mid-30s and mid-50s is a period of shifting responsibilities, evolving career paths and growing financial pressures. Many women in this stage juggle multiple roles—managing careers, raising children, and caring for aging parents—all while trying to build long-term financial security.

This stage of life sees women carrying a disproportionate share of unpaid caregiving. Australia has 2.65 million unpaid carers, and 72% of primary carers are women. This caregiving burden, combined with part-time work and career interruptions, significantly impacts women’s earnings, superannuation balances, and long-term wealth.

Women’s financial setbacks become increasingly apparent in midlife. While superannuation gender gaps are slowly improving, the latest ATO data (from 2021) shows that the average super balance for women was $150,922, compared to $189,892 for men—a gap of 20.5%.

'The State of Women’s Wealth' also highlights how this gap extends beyond super:

  • 48% of women have less super than they expected at this stage of life (vs. 38% of men)
  • 57% of women have less savings than expected (vs. 41% of men)
  • 52% of women earn less than they thought they would (vs. 37% of men)
  • 48% of women feel behind in their career progression (vs. 34% of men)
  • 46% of women feel behind in home ownership (vs. 33% of men)

These individual setbacks contribute to the $51.8 billion annual cost of the gender pay gap to the Australian economy, according to WGEA. One major driver of women’s lower lifetime earnings is part-time work. WGEA data shows that 29.7% of women work part-time, compared to just 10.8% of men. More women are also employed casually, meaning fewer benefits and lower super contributions.

Over 50

Women over 50 often continue to feel the pressures of the 'sandwich generation', as well personal upheavals and career shifts. They tend to fall into two broad categories; either they are looking to upskill, seek promotions, or invest to secure their retirement. Or, particularly those experiencing separation or divorce, are rebuilding from scratch.

For a rising number of women, financial setbacks in later life are leading to far greater consequences—particularly homelessness.

  • One-third of all divorces (30.7%) are granted to women aged 50+
  • Older women are the fastest-growing group experiencing homelessness in Australia
  • 31% increase in women over 55 experiencing homelessness from 2011 to 2016, with a further 6.6% rise by 2021
  • Homelessness among older women has grown almost 40% in a decade (2011–2021)

This crisis is driven by a combination of low super balances, part-time work, career interruptions, and the gender pay gap, compounded by rising living costs, an unaffordable rental market, and age discrimination in employment.

Research shows that certain factors significantly increase the risk of homelessness for women over 55:

  • 28% of women in private rentals are at risk
  • 34% of women not employed full-time are at risk
  • 65% of single mothers are at risk
  • 85% of women with a history of financial insecurity face a high risk

Retirement

The average woman would have to add an extra $236 per month into her superannuation fund, or alternatively, work an extra 11 years, in order to retire with the same super balance as the average man.

The Government, the ATO, various super funds all recognise women retire with 25% less superannuation, on average, than men (according to ASFA), in addition to having lower overall savings. This financial disparity places many women at a higher risk of economic insecurity in their later years, with 1 in 3 single women over 60 living in income poverty.

Finder research reveals that 35% of women aged 65 or older have less than $1,000 saved, compared to just 22% of men. Of those women aged 65 and older who do have savings, the average balance is around $46,650, while men in the same age bracket have an average of $67,920 – representing a 46% difference.

Conclusion

It’s important to celebrate the progress we’ve made. Yet, it’s still not enough. As 'The State of Women’s Wealth' clearly shows, women continue to have less wealth than men, simply because of their gender. The more we talk about the challenges facing women’s wealth and the opportunities for change, the more we learn, grow and overcome. As one teaches one… one becomes many.

 

Pascale Helyar-Moray OAM was one of the contributors to the Finder report. She's also the founder of Grow My Money, a platform where members can shop with scores of major Australian brands and receive a cashback into their superannuation account. She's the author of the book, Rich Woman Poor Woman.

 

3 Comments
Jason
April 18, 2025

As a single dad who took time off and worked part time to try raise the kids in a fairer and healthier way, the long term outcomes seem random and not purely based on one's sex. If the relationship continues it doesn't really matter who made the money as it is a joint resource for both parents and the kids. The trouble really comes during separation and who wins financially seems to come down to fortunate timing or luck, who has the most family support, or sadly who is able to engage the cleverest lawyers. Much to some mens (and women's) annoyance all super is now divvied up, even defined benefit pensions are split. I think it's a different story when we are talking about women who are either long term single, or split from a childless long term relationship who have to resort to civil courts to get fair dispensation. You hear some sad stories of many women who have moved in and lived in their partners houses for many years, effectively paying market rent and are suddenly booted out with no compensation but are too nice or too poor to take it to court. In these scenarios the power is in the hands of the wealthier partner who statistically speaking would be the man in a heterosexual relationship. The primary factor is relative incomes eg construction versus nursing, both difficult and dirty jobs with a big pay differential. And confidence. Clearly in this society women are generally less confident than men for a range of reasons and this should be fixed.

Cam
April 17, 2025

If women taking time out of the workforce to raise kids is causing a wealth gap, maybe don't do it. Personally I think either parent wishing to work reduced hours or stay at home until kids reach school is great. Its your life and your choices. But I keep reading articles saying its the biggest cause of differing wealth, and that is a problem.
I get that some of the differences in caregiving is based on some couples or at least males, viewing it as the female role. In many others though its a choice, and the people making the choice are aware of the financial implications.
I see again the statistics about men and women at 65 and in retirement, while frustratingly the policy ideas to change this all seem to be aimed at people under 40. Can we please have a policy idea that helps older women? If there's no plan to help anyone over 40, you can't complain about the wealth differences for at least 25 years as you're not trying to address it.

Neil
April 18, 2025

Perhaps $ alone is not the unit of measurement for a happy life. For those women, who have taken a hit on their $ wealth through the lifestyle choices THEY have made, perhaps a balanced scorecard approach is required – one that includes measures of happiness (eg. the quality of the child/ren they have raised by taking time out of the workforce rather than sending their offspring to be tended to by babysitters at a childcare centre, the pleasure they received in looking after their ageing parents rather than sending them to a dispassionate nursing home, etc).

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Australia’s shameful super gap

Why women are most hurt by financial pandemic

How to improve retirement outcomes for women

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why the $5.4 trillion wealth transfer is a generational tragedy

The intergenerational wealth transfer, largely driven by a housing boom, exacerbates economic inequality, stifles productivity, and impedes social mobility. Solutions lie in addressing the housing problem, not taxing wealth.

The 2025 Australian Federal election – implications for investors

With an election due by 17 May, we are effectively in campaign mode with the Government announcing numerous spending promises since January and the Coalition often matching them. Here's what the election means for investors.

Finding the best income-yielding assets

With fixed term deposit rates declining and bank hybrids being phased out, what are the best options for investors seeking income? This goes through the choices, and the opportunities and risks involved.

What history reveals about market corrections and crashes

The S&P 500's recent correction raises concerns about a bear market. History shows corrections are driven by high rates, unemployment, or global shocks, and that there's reason for optimism for nervous investors today. 

Howard Marks: the investing game has changed

The famed investor says the rapid switch from globalisation to trade wars is the biggest upheaval in the investing environment since World War Two. And a new world requires a different investment approach.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 605 with weekend update

Trump's tariffs and China's retaliatory strike have sent the Nasdaq into a bear market with the S&P 500 not far behind. What are the implications for the economy and markets, and what should investors do now? 

  • 3 April 2025

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

4 ways to take advantage of the market turmoil

Every crisis throws up opportunities. Here are ideas to capitalise on this one, including ‘overbalancing’ your portfolio in stocks, buying heavily discounted LICs, and cherry picking bombed out sectors like oil and gas.

Shares

Why the ASX needs dual-class shares

The ASX is exploring the introduction of dual class share structures for listed companies. Opposition is building to the plan but the ASX should ignore the naysayers and bring Australia into line with its global peers.

The state of women's wealth in Australia

New research shows the average Australian woman has $428,000 in net wealth, 40% less than the average man. This takes a deep dive into what the gender wealth gap looks like across different life stages.

Investing

The two most dangerous words in investing

Market extremes are where the biggest investment risks and opportunities lie. While events like this are usually only obvious in hindsight, learning to watch out for these two words can alert you to them in real time.

Shares

Investing in the backbone of the digital age

Semiconductors are used to make microchips and are essential to a vast range of technology and devices. This looks at what’s driving demand for chips, how the industry is evolving, and favoured stocks to play the theme.

Gold

Why gold’s record highs in 2025 differ from prior peaks

Gold prices hit new recent highs, driven by a stronger euro, tariff concerns, and steady ETF buying – all while the precious metal’s fundamental backdrop remains solid amid a shifting global economic landscape.

Now might be the best time to switch out of bank hybrids

In this interview, Schroders' Helen Mason discusses investing in corporate and financial credit securities, market impacts of tariffs, opportunities for cash investments, and views on tier two and hybrid bonds.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.