Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 588

The US market outlook is more nuanced than it seems

After a seemingly endless and exhaustive process to determine the next president of the United States, we can all now get back to business and focus once again on markets and the economy. The substantial retreat in implied market volatility since the U.S. election suggests that investors are, in fact, ready to do just that.

Elections matter, earnings matter more

While we and many others have spent countless hours analysing policy implications that could result from this election, it’s important to remember that earnings drive equity markets more than any other factor.

We are nearing the end of third-quarter earnings season, and it has been reasonably upbeat. The other familiar mega-cap names have comfortably beaten analysts’ growth expectations. Importantly, we are also seeing broader performance, a theme that we believe will strengthen in 2025.

Third-quarter earnings growth is sustaining the recovery from the rate-hiking cycle that began in March 2022. More industries in the S&P 500 Index grew their earnings over the preceding 12 months than in 3Q 2023. The headline growth number is still being stretched upward by mega-cap tech and dragged down by cyclical companies, especially in the energy sector. However, the growth of the median stock has closed in on the growth of the capitalisation-weighted index over the course of the year. We expect that gap to close further next year, as cyclicals make a comeback and mega-cap tech growth normalises.

Markets like clarity

The nature of some of Donald Trump’s policy proposals means that announcements of key appointments could still move markets. Yet the clarity of the result, with confirmation of Republican control of Congress coming in mid-November, has given investors some certainty. Nonetheless, third-quarter earnings are a reminder that the election result is not the only reason the S&P 500 Index crossed the 6,000 threshold last week.

While a lot of attention has focused on the inflationary and deficit-raising potential of Trump’s immigration, trade and tax ideas in particular, we tend to think those concerns are overstated. As Ashok Bhatia has written, we believe disinflation and a path to a 4% policy rate is being baked into investors’ expectations, allowing the focus to shift from inflation and central banks to the fiscal and growth backdrop.

For equity investors, this will mean assessing policy implications region by region, sector by sector, stock by stock. We think we will start to see that sometime early in the new year—and our equity research team sees a lot of nuance and complexity to deal with.

Industry sector outlooks in US are mixed

Take energy and power, for example. The headlines might suggest that the election result is good news for fossil fuel companies and bad news for renewables and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). But the IRA is creating thousands of jobs, primarily in Republican-controlled states, and renewables remain the quickest and cheapest market solution to the US power scarcity. The liquid natural gas sector looks set to benefit from the removal of the permit pause, and oil field services could benefit from more extraction activity, but oil and gas investors remain focused on capital discipline and wouldn’t wish to see rising supply pushing down prices.

Similar nuances can be seen across other sectors.

We see good reason for the general outperformance of industrials, which often greets Republican victories in anticipation of pro-cyclical, pro-infrastructure policies. But, again, that suggests investors see little prospect of a broad repeal of IRA measures. 

Adjacent sectors like transport, aerospace and defense, or machinery and autos, face potentially strong crosscurrents. High tariffs could support domestic transport sectors such as railways and trucking while hurting cross-border operators. Tariffs would also raise the cost of inputs for auto and aerospace manufacturers. Whether lower energy prices, looser regulations and other pro-growth measures outweigh these pressures will often depend on company specifics.

Stronger demand for industrial machinery would feed through to the semiconductor sector, but it remains unclear how Trump’s “America First” approach might affect existing CHIPS and Science Act funding. A retreat from the previous administration’s antitrust regulation is likely to benefit the tech sector in general, but high exposure to China poses a risk for many companies. Tariffs and China exposure are likely to become increasingly important factors in retail and ecommerce, as well.

In health care, we see a potential split between the many health care services businesses that could benefit from a friendlier tax, regulatory and M&A environment, and the large-cap therapeutics companies that face uncertainty on drug-pricing policy.

Financials is perhaps the only sector where this election result seems entirely supportive. A steeper yield curve, lower taxes, a more energized dealmaking environment and looser regulation (including the potential dilution of Basel III measures) would all be positive for the sector.

Zero-sum game?

Overall, we are optimistic on nominal growth as we see inflation and rates trending down against a generally pro-business policy background. However, we think it is important for investors to acknowledge that we have moved from an era of globalization, in which free trade enhances growth worldwide, to a new era of mercantilism and protectionism.

That could mean a zero-sum game with more distinct winners and losers—regionally, sectorally and company by company. We expect to see many of the subsector and bottom-up nuances play out as President-elect Trump assembles his government and settles on policies; and when that happens, we believe an active approach to managing risk and opportunity will be paramount.

Investors are getting back to business after a tumultuous election year. But that business looks to be very different from what we’ve known for the past four years.

 

Joseph V. Amato is President and Chief Investment Officer, Equities; at Neuberger Berman, a sponsor of Firstlinks.

This material is provided for general informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. You should consult your accountant, tax adviser and/or attorney for advice concerning your own circumstances.

For more articles and papers from Neuberger Berman, click here.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

A guide to investing in a US election year

MFS Investments: Blue wave fails to reach shore

The 2020 US presidential elections

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

16 ASX stocks to buy and hold forever, updated

This time last year, I highlighted 16 ASX stocks that investors could own indefinitely. One year on, I look at whether there should be any changes to the list of stocks as well as which companies are worth buying now. 

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

2025-26 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ABS recently released figures which are used to determine key superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2025. This outlines the rates and thresholds that are changing and those that aren’t.  

Is Gen X ready for retirement?

With the arrival of the new year, the first members of ‘Generation X’ turned 60, marking the start of the MTV generation’s collective journey towards retirement. Are Gen Xers and our retirement system ready for the transition?

Why the $5.4 trillion wealth transfer is a generational tragedy

The intergenerational wealth transfer, largely driven by a housing boom, exacerbates economic inequality, stifles productivity, and impedes social mobility. Solutions lie in addressing the housing problem, not taxing wealth.

What Warren Buffett isn’t saying speaks volumes

Warren Buffett's annual shareholder letter has been fixture for avid investors for decades. In his latest letter, Buffett is reticent on many key topics, but his actions rather than words are sending clear signals to investors.

Latest Updates

Investing

Designing a life, with money to spare

Are you living your life by default or by design? It strikes me that many people are doing the former and living according to others’ expectations of them, leading to poor choices including with their finances.

Investment strategies

A closer look at defensive assets for turbulent times

After the recent market slump, it's a good time to brush up on the defensive asset classes – what they are, why hold them, and how they can both deliver on your goals and increase the reliability of your desired outcomes.

Financial planning

Are lifetime income streams the answer or just the easy way out?

Lately, there's been a push by Government for lifetime income streams as a solution to retirement income challenges. We run the numbers on these products to see whether they deliver on what they promise.

Shares

Is it time to buy the Big Four banks?

The stellar run of the major ASX banks last year left many investors scratching their heads. After a recent share price pullback, has value emerged in these banks, or is it best to steer clear of them?

Investment strategies

The useful role that subordinated debt can play in your portfolio

If you’re struggling to replace the hybrid exposure in your portfolio, you’re not alone. Subordinated debt is an option, and here is a guide on what it is and how it can fit into your investment mix.

Shares

Europe is back and small caps there offer significant opportunities

Trump’s moves on tariffs, defence, and Ukraine, have awoken European Governments after a decade of lethargy. European small cap manager, Alantra Asset Management, says it could herald a new era for the continent.

Shares

Lessons from the rise and fall of founder-led companies

Founder-led companies often attract investors due to leaders' personal stakes and long-term vision. But founder presence alone does not guarantee success, and the challenge is to identify which ones will succeed in the long term.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.