Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 585

Fixing the construction industry house of cards

If there is an industry Australia needs confidence in right now, it’s the residential construction sector. Yet, at a time of unprecedented need to build, construction companies are collapsing like houses of cards, leaving consumers with lost deposits and half-finished homes.

For consumers, embarking on building or renovating a home represents a large financial commitment, however when compared to other major investments that Australians will make in their lifetime, protection for their funds is limited. Indeed, builders can – and do – spend consumer deposits in any way that they please.

This article argues for the introduction of a regulatory mechanism that ring-fences consumer funds as a necessary element to restore confidence in the sector, improve the financial viability of homebuilders, and give hope that national home-building targets can be met.

Something’s broken in the residential construction sector

Australia needs to build new homes. Driving demand is high immigration, with 2023 seeing a net migration of 518,000 immigrants, coupled with an ongoing trend for fewer habitants per home. On the supply side, building commencements are in decline, with 2024 data for new dwelling commencements at 10-year lows. Overall, the ratio of new population to new dwelling approval is the worst since data began to be recorded in 1984.

Despite this urgent need to build, residential construction companies are going into liquidation at an alarming rate. According to ASIC data, in the 2023-2024 financial year 2,832 construction companies went into insolvency, representing the greatest proportion of company collapses, and a problem that is trending worse, not better. These are not small nor newly established companies either. Several industry-revered names have gone under, including Clough Group, Probuild, and Porter Davis Homes.

Covid disruptions, including skilled labour shortages and rising raw material costs, are often blamed for the high level of insolvencies. However, as the economy begins to settle down, the building industry doesn’t appear to be following suit. Warning signs have been unheeded, with a 2022 review by the Reserve Bank of Australia identifying financial pressures across the sector. This same report predicted that insolvency levels would increase – exactly what has transpired since – and the potential for the financial stress of these insolvencies to spread to consumers and the wider construction supply chain.

Going ‘under the hood’, Australia’s homebuilding industry is characterised by low profit margins and fixed price contracts, meaning that there is little headroom nor mechanism for builders to absorb pressures such as rises in material costs and shortages of labour. Indeed, rising labour and/or material prices are a common tune when companies have entered into insolvency.

This means that many homebuilders have been operating at negative cashflows, where suppliers don’t get paid, and projects are left unfinished. According to the Association of Professional Builders,” the construction industry is broken and will continue to fail until it is fixed”, a call that has been echoed by investigative journalists and suppliers to the sector.

Consumers left ‘carrying the can’

When a residential homebuilder goes bust, consumers become unsecured creditors and are at the bottom of the food chain after a lengthy insolvency process. For many consumers, the great Australian dream of building or renovating a home has turned into a nightmare. News is replete with stories of lost consumer deposits and half-finished homes.

The only available remedy is builder’s insurance, with most states (Tasmania being an exception) legislating that builders take out insurance that covers an insolvency event. However, such protection has bounds: claims cannot be initiated until five weeks after insolvency, policy limits vary between states, and in some cases, are limited to 20 per cent of the value of the build. In the case of Porter Davis Homes, this insurance wasn’t taken out in the first place, leaving consumers completely in the lurch.

The fallout does not stop at consumers; subcontractors also join consumers on the unsecured creditors' lists. Often small or family-run businesses become unsecured creditors needing to cover the cost of their materials and staff if they want to continue to trade.

The asymmetric risk for consumers, compared to other largest investments

Embarking on building or renovating a home is one of the largest investments an Australian will make. Yet, in comparison to other large investments, such as superannuation, banking deposits, or payments to professional services firms, there is little regulation in the construction sector regarding how consumer funds are utilised and protected.

Across financial services, regulations protect consumer funds in the event that one of these institutions collapses. Consider consumer payments for legal services; here consumer funds must be held in a client account and only used for their intended purpose. Contrastingly, when a homeowner places a deposit with a builder, this money can be spent for any purpose. In some cases, there have been stories of builders on luxurious holidays at the same time as homes go unfinished. More often, given the cash flow pressures across the industry, consumer deposits from one project are used to complete prior commitments.

It seems nonsensical that consumer deposits can be used for purposes outside which they are intended, however builder accounts are opaque and it is very hard to know where the money goes and little incentive or need for homebuilders to spend money on the project for which it is intended.

One remedy for homebuilders’ tight cash flows is to delay payments to suppliers. Another remedy is to take on more projects because these new deposits will increase cash flow in the short term. Paradoxically, this means that troubled builders put more consumers at risk, thus becoming a classic Ponzi scheme – until it falls over.

More money does not fix a broken system

The present political solution to Australia’s home-building challenge is to throw a wall of money at it. Federally, there is the 1.2 million new homes target backed by the $10 billion Housing Australia Future Fund, a $3 billion New Homes Bonus, and a $2 billion Social Housing Accelerator. States are chipping in, too; one example is the New South Wales Government’s $2.2 billion commitment to new infrastructure and unlocking land – all with the view to promote new dwellings. 

The NSW Premier, Chris Minns, says his state is currently unable to meet its target of 75,000 new homes annually. There is very little evidence that throwing money at the problem has yet resulted in a single new home being built, but plenty of historical evidence that such large-scale stimulus will increase inflation – exactly the pressure that the residential construction sector has proved it cannot cope with.

A solution – protecting consumer deposits

Against a backdrop of stories of consumers being left in the lurch, it is hard to see confidence returning unless the industry takes a new approach. Financial services firms already provide a template for ring-fencing consumer funds and ensuring that money is spent for its intended purpose. Extending this protection to the residential construction sector would require setting up project accounts, where consumer funds reside until they are drawn down by builders and subcontractors and the work is completed to standard. In the event that the builder goes bust, this money remains in place to pay subcontractors and continue the build. A side benefit of this approach is that it may improve the robustness of the construction industry, providing homebuilders with a motive to ensure that each project stands on sound financial footing.

Stories of consumers losing their deposits are not what is needed right now. Fragile supply chains where subcontractors are unsure if they will get paid do not bode well for the sector either. The idea of ring-fenced accounts is not new. It’s time for governments to fix what is broken, chiefly how money flows through the industry. Doing so might be the only way to get value for money from Australian taxpayers' investment in new homes.

 

Dr Bradley Hastings is an Insights Associate at the UNSW Business Insights Institute and Dr Peter Swan is a Professor in the School of Banking and Finance at UNSW Business School. To learn more, watch SBS Insight: Season 2024 Episode 23 – Buildings Blocked, which features Dr Brad Hastings

The UNSW Business Insights Institute delivers economic and business insights, research and methods to government and business. Using a program-based approach consisting of Knowledge Hubs and Research Labs, the Institute helps industry partners solve complex challenges by providing them with access to novel research insights.

This article was originally published by UNSW Business School’s BusinessThink. Subscribe to BusinessThink for the latest research, analysis and insights from UNSW Business School.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Labor policies and the impact on housing

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The nuts and bolts of family trusts

There are well over 800,000 family trusts in Australia, controlling more than $3 trillion of assets. Here's a guide on whether a family trust may have a place in your individual investment strategy.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 581 with weekend update

A recent industry event made me realise that a 30 year old investing trend could still have serious legs. Could it eventually pose a threat to two of Australia's biggest companies?

  • 10 October 2024

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 583 with weekend update

Investing guru Howard Marks says he had two epiphanies while visiting Australia recently: the two major asset classes aren’t what you think they are, and one key decision matters above all else when building portfolios.

  • 24 October 2024

Preserving wealth through generations is hard

How have so many wealthy families through history managed to squander their fortunes? This looks at the lessons from these families and offers several solutions to making and keeping money over the long-term.

A big win for bank customers against scammers

A recent ruling from The Australian Financial Complaints Authority may herald a new era for financial scams. For the first time, a bank is being forced to reimburse a customer for the amount they were scammed.

The quirks of retirement planning with an age gap

A big age gap can make it harder to find a solution that works for both partners – financially and otherwise. Having a frank conversation about the future, and having it as early as possible, is essential.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Warren Buffett is preparing for a bear market. Should you?

Berkshire Hathaway’s third quarter earnings update reveals Buffett is selling stocks and building record cash reserves. Here’s a look at his track record in calling market tops and whether you should follow his lead and dial down risk.

Economy

US election implications for investors and Australia

The return of Donald Trump to the US presidency brings the prospect of more US tax cuts and deregulation, but also more tariff hikes, trade wars and policy uncertainty. Here's what it means for markets going forward.

Retirement

The rising tension between housing debt and retirement balances

Australians are taking more mortgage debt into their 60s than ever before. Retirement planning assumptions haven’t adapted and could result in future income projections that ultimately disappoint retirees.

Investment strategies

Why megatrends can deliver big upside (and downside)

The magnitude and duration of society's most important trends are often underestimated. While these trends are usually touted as a tailwind, one in particular could have dark consequences for many assets.

Property

Fixing the construction industry house of cards

Australia needs to build new homes like never before but construction firms keep going belly up. Unless regulators act now, consumers will continue to carry the can.

Investment strategies

How investor portfolios have become riskier versus history

Risk in portfolios has dramatically increased as time horizons have shortened and investors have piled into equities. It's resulted in a growing disconnect between what investors need and what the financial industry is delivering.

Shares

The abacus, big data and a brief history of indexing

Equity indices have evolved over time, led by step-changes in our ability to manipulate data. Despite the rise of passive investing, they weren't initially meant to be investment tools.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.