Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 70

Just what is a re-contribution strategy?

You may have heard about a ‘re-contribution strategy’, but do you really know what it is and how it works? Often when an adviser or accountant provides an idea that will reduce a tax liability, you accept it without really knowing how it is achieved. That’s what you pay them for – right!

Let me explain what a re-contribution strategy is.

Who is eligible?

A re-contribution strategy is where you withdraw money from your SMSF and re-contribute the money back into your SMSF. Before you can do this, you need to be able to access your money by satisfying one of the following conditions of release:

  • reached your preservation age (55 to 60 years) and retired from your employment
  • reached age 65 (working or not)
  • ceased work temporarily as a result of physical and/or mental illness
  • ceased work as a result of permanent incapacity
  • experienced a terminal medical condition
  • accessed money under severe financial hardship grounds
  • accessed money under compassionate grounds via the Department of Human Services
  • accessed money under the transition to retirement arrangements.

Of course it is unlikely that a person accessing their money under financial hardship or compassionate grounds would be considering a re-contribution strategy.

If you access money in your SMSF without satisfying at least one of the conditions of release, then you will be in trouble with the Australian Taxation Office which regulates SMSFs.

Why bother?

The two main reasons why advisers may suggest a re-contribution strategy is to:

  • Reduce the tax payable on your superannuation pension, especially if you are under the age of 60
  • Lower the tax payable on benefits paid to your beneficiaries in the event of your death.

Money in your SMSF is comprised of two components. One component is the tax-free component which is made up of non-concessional contributions received by your SMSF. The other component is the taxable component which is made up of concessional contributions received by your SMSF and earnings from SMSF investments. Under the superannuation and income tax laws, superannuation benefits (pension and lump sum) paid to you are subject to a proportion rule which requires your benefit to be paid in the same proportion as the tax-free and taxable components of your superannuation interest in your SMSF.

For example, if your SMSF is comprised of a 60% taxable component and a 40% tax-free component, then your superannuation benefit, when paid out, must retain the 60% taxable component and the 40% tax-free component.

A withdrawal and re-contribution strategy involves withdrawing or accessing your superannuation entitlements that consist of the taxable and tax-fee components and re-contributing some or all of the money back into your SMSF as a non-concessional contribution (i.e. all tax-free). This increases the amount of tax-free money in your superannuation account which provides tax savings if you are accessing a pension while under the age of 60. It may also mean large tax savings when you pass on your superannuation savings to your non-dependant beneficiaries after your death.

This is because the taxable component of a pension benefit received by a person under the age of 60 is taxed at the person’s marginal tax rate less a 15% tax offset. Converting the taxable component to a tax-free component increases your tax-free pension income.

When you pass away, your beneficiaries who are over the age of 18 or are non-dependant will also receive a greater portion of your death benefit without having to pay tax.

Watch that you don’t exceed your non-concessional contributions cap. In addition, if you are aged 65 to 74 you will need to be at least working 40 hours in a period of 30 consecutive days to be able to make non-concessional contributions into your superannuation fund.

It pays to understand how things work so you can better discuss with your adviser.

 

Monica Rule worked for the Australian Taxation Office for 28 years and is the author of ‘The Self Managed Super Handbook – Superannuation Law for Self Managed Superannuation Funds in plain English’. Monica is presenting a series of SMSF seminars and for details see www.monicarule.com.au.

 

  •   11 July 2014
  • 4
  •      
  •   
4 Comments
Peter Grace
July 11, 2014

The theory is wonderful but what about the need to liquidate assets to make the withdrawal and the potential tax payable as well as being out of the market whilst all this is going on. SMSF trustees holding a large percent of the fund in illiquid assets like property can't do this. And then there is the fee charged by the adviser to manage the process. And all you may end up achieving is saving the tax payable by your beneficiaries and paying it yourself. It might be easier to cash out of super once you have no remaining tax dependents - the payment is tax free after age 60 and most retirees will be able to arrange their affairs so they don't pay much tax anyway.

Ramani
July 11, 2014

While the problems posed by Peter Grace may be navigated subject to deed provisions re: lump sum benefit payments and in specie contributions, the phase of the fund (accumulation or hybrid?) and age profile of members (all above 60?), the truism that nothing about tax is simple still applies.
Apart from the Cleopatran ability of ATO to change its mind any time (coincidentally when the previous position is revenue-negative, what a surprise!), recontribution hides a potential posthumous sting. The ability to claw back the contribution taxes paid, along with their compounding effect (since the later of 1 July 1988 or subsequent entry) could mean significant top-up to the lump sum death benefit, and increasing the tax-free component will reduce this figure.
As this is a rare instance of the taxman returning collected taxes for many years, it is not to be ignored.

Davo
March 30, 2015

No wonder the average man in the street cant be bothered with this stuff.

Andrew Peters
July 12, 2014

All good points raised.

I think one of the main reasons to explore a recontribution is simply a level of protection against future legislative risk.

Over the next 20 years I'm not so sure we will see the tax concessions on pensions retained as they are today - in our Advice Business we counsel all SMSF investors about the pros and cons of recontributions, including Ramani's point about änti detriment"payments.

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Building a lazy ETF portfolio in 2026

What are the best ways to build a simple portfolio from scratch? I’ve addressed this issue before but think it’s worth revisiting given markets and the world have since changed, throwing up new challenges and things to consider.

Get set for a bumpy 2026

At this time last year, I forecast that 2025 would likely be a positive year given strong economic prospects and disinflation. The outlook for this year is less clear cut and here is what investors should do.

Meg on SMSFs: First glimpse of revised Division 296 tax

Treasury has released draft legislation for a new version of the controversial $3 million super tax. It's a significant improvement on the original proposal but there are some stings in the tail.

Ray Dalio on 2025’s real story, Trump, and what’s next

The renowned investor says 2025’s real story wasn’t AI or US stocks but the shift away from American assets and a collapse in the value of money. And he outlines how to best position portfolios for what’s ahead.

10 fearless forecasts for 2026

The predictions include dividends will outstrip growth as a source of Australian equity returns, US market performance will be underwhelming, while US government bonds will beat gold.

13 million spare bedrooms: Rethinking Australia’s housing shortfall

We don’t have a housing shortage; we have housing misallocation. This explores why so many bedrooms go unused, what’s been tried before, and five things to unlock housing capacity – no new building required.

Latest Updates

3 ways to fix Australia’s affordability crisis

Our cost-of-living pressures go beyond the RBA: surging house prices, excessive migration, and expanding government programs, including the NDIS, are fuelling inflation, demanding bold, structural solutions.

Superannuation

The Division 296 tax is still a quasi-wealth tax

The latest draft legislation may be an improvement but it still has the whiff of a wealth tax about it. The question remains whether a golden opportunity for simpler and fairer super tax reform has been missed.

Superannuation

Is it really ‘your’ super fund?

Your super isn’t a bank account you own; it’s a trust you merely benefit from. So why would the Division 296 tax you personally on assets, income and gains you legally don’t own?

Shares

Inflation is the biggest destroyer of wealth

Inflation consistently undermines wealth, even in low-inflation environments. Whether or not it returns to target, investors must protect portfolios from its compounding impact on future living standards.

Shares

Picking the next sector winner

Global equity markets have experienced stellar returns in 2024 and 2025 led, in large part, by the boom in AI. Which sector could be the next star in global markets? This names three future winners.

Infrastructure

What investors should expect when investing in infrastructure: yield

The case for listed infrastructure is built on stable earnings and cash flows, which have sustained 4% dividend yields across cycles and supported consistent, inflation-linked long-term returns.

Investment strategies

Valuing AI: Extreme bubble, new golden era, or both

The US stock market sits in prolonged bubble territory, driven by AI enthusiasm. History suggests eventual mean reversion, reminding investors to weigh potential risks against current market optimism.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.