Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 17

Taxing as revenue or capital gains and why it matters

Investors are often confused about the difference between a revenue profit and a capital gain. People are even more confused by whether a loss is a revenue loss or a capital loss and are frequently bamboozled as to which type of loss can be applied against which gain.

Does it matter?

Characterisation as revenue or capital

By way of illustration, assume an investor, in addition to their salary, has gross gains from sale of shares of $10,000, an equivalent loss from sale of shares and also a $10,000 loss from a negatively geared rental property. All equities have been held for longer than 12 months and the investor is not a share trader.

There are three fundamental questions to answer:

  • is the gain a revenue profit or a capital gain?
  • are the losses revenue losses or capital losses?
  • are there any restrictions in applying the losses against income or gains?

Characterisation of a gain or loss as revenue or capital is a matter of fact and circumstance having regard to many matters such as whether the investor is an individual or other legal entity, the investor’s intention and the nature of the activity undertaken.

In forming a view, the ATO will have regard to various factors including the dollar value of the portfolio, the type of securities, the frequency and dollar value of turnover, the average holding period and whether or not the investor has what the ATO would regard as a sophisticated trading strategy or methodology. Weighing these up, the ATO may reach a conclusion that the securities are held as revenue assets.

In contrast, a passive holding where equities are bought and sold infrequently is more likely to be regarded as capital. Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules as to what constitutes frequent activity.

Just to confuse matters, it is possible for an investor to designate one parcel of shares as a trading (revenue) portfolio and another as capital. Provided this is carefully documented and shares do not ‘drift’ from one parcel to another, the distinction can be made. Experience shows that the loss- making investments tend to drift towards the trading portfolio and the gains towards the capital portfolio – all too often after the event. This approach seldom survives close scrutiny by the ATO.

Rules of thumb

Given all of this, are there any rules of thumb? Whilst there are many exceptions the following could be adopted as guidelines:

  • where a person holds an investment for longer than 12 months, any gain should be regarded as capital (but not always)
  • likewise, any loss on sale of such an asset would be regarded as a capital loss
  • a loss where expenses exceed income (such as a negatively geared rental property) is a revenue loss
  • regular, high volume trading will be viewed as revenue gains and losses.

Moving to the loss rules, the following matters should be noted:

  • revenue losses can be applied against either income or capital gains
  • capital losses can only be applied against capital gains, not against income
  • one dollar of capital loss offsets one dollar of gross capital gain
  • one dollar of revenue loss offsets two dollars of gross long-term capital gain. That is, if the gain relates to an asset which a person has held for longer than 12 months, the 50% CGT discount applies to reduce the taxable amount to half of the gross gain. The revenue loss is then applied against this reduced amount.

The worked example

Where do these rules take us in the above example? The investor would offset the capital loss on shares dollar for dollar against the capital gain. The rental loss could be offset against salary.

If we change the example and assume the investor had no capital losses, they could apply the rental loss, either in full against their salary or part against the ‘after 50% discount’ gain of $5,000 and the remaining $5,000 against salary. The tax outcome would be the same in either case.

As an alternative, they might consider crystallising capital losses by selling shares with otherwise unrealised losses. Care would need to be taken with such a strategy as it may be viewed unfavourably by the ATO, particularly if the investor sold the investments prior to 30 June and bought back the same investments shortly after year-end.

As 30 June approaches, investors should take the time to review their portfolios and also the position they are taking in respect of tax treatment.

 

Ray Cummings is Principal of Greenoak Advisory Pty Ltd, and for 15 years was a Tax Partner at Pitcher Partners.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The when and why of four million Australian retirees

Who needs the Caymans? 10 ways to avoid paying tax

A capital gains tax discount is legitimate but how much?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirement is a risky business for most people

While encouraging people to draw down on their accumulated wealth in retirement might be good public policy, several million retirees disagree because they are purposefully conserving that capital. It’s time for a different approach.

The perfect portfolio for the next decade

This examines the performance of key asset classes and sub-sectors in 2024 and over longer timeframes, and the lessons that can be drawn for constructing an investment portfolio for the next decade.

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

The challenges with building a dividend portfolio

Getting regular, growing income from stocks is tougher with the dividend yield on the ASX nearing 25-year lows. Here are some conventional and not-so-conventional ideas for investors wanting to build a dividend portfolio.

How much do you need to retire?

Australians are used to hearing dire warnings that they don't have enough saved for a comfortable retirement. Yet most people need to save a lot less than you might think — as long as they meet an important condition.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 594 with weekend update

It’s well documented that many retirees draw down the minimum amount required and die with much of their super balances untouched. This explores the reasons why and some potential solutions to address the issue.

  • 16 January 2025

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

9 ways to fix Australia's housing crisis

Decades of policy failure have induced a fall in housing affordability. Unless painful changes are made, an underclass will emerge in a society that is supposed to boast the one of the world's highest standards of living.

Shares

Australia: why the chase for even higher dividend yields?

Australia boasts one of the world's highest dividend yielding sharemarkets, providing substantial benefits to investors and retirees. Despite this, individuals often stretch for even more yield, to their detriment.

Shares

MIGA – Make Income Great Again

The Australian sharemarket seems to be rewarding a number of unprofitable companies on the promise of future riches. Yet profits and cashflows still matter, as a recent case study of Domino's Pizza shows.

Shares

Mapping future US market returns

Exceptional returns from the US sharemarket over the past decade have driven by sales growth, margin expansion, rising valuations, and dividends. Predicting future returns requires careful consideration of these factors.

Shares

Read this before you go all in on US equities

US equities rule global markets, but history is littered with examples of markets that seemed invincible — until they weren’t. Diversification will be key for investor portfolios going forwards.

Property

What impact would scrapping stamp duty have on housing?

Increasing house prices pose challenges for housing affordability. This investigates the impact of stamp duty on the property market, and how removing the tax could help address several key issues.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.