Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 591

9 lessons from 2024

It’s been another eventful year in financial markets. Stocks soaring for a second year in a row, America continuing to attract a gush of money despite re-electing a convicted felon as President, ‘meme coins’ again back in vogue, high profile ASX owner operators coming unstuck, and commodities continuing a decade-long dry run, albeit with some exceptions.

Here are my key lessons from 2024:

1. The expensive can always get more expensive

We started the year with the S&P 500 being moderately expensive on traditional valuation metrics and concerns about an increasing concentration in the Magnificent Seven tech stocks. Yet, we’re ending this year with much more expensive US market and even greater concentration into the ‘Mag 7’ companies.

The S&P 500 is up 28% year-to-date, while the Nasdaq is 30% higher. About 10% of those gains have come from forecast earnings growth for this year. The rest has come from expansion in valuation multiples.

The price-to-earnings (PE) ratio of the S&P 500 has moved up to 26x today on a trailing earnings basis. That’s 32% higher than the average PE ratio of 19.7x since 1989.

The Magnificent Seven stocks have rallied ~50% this year and surpassed US$18 trillion in market value for the first time in history. These stocks now account for a record 33% of the S&P 500 index.

The share price rises in mega-cap tech stocks can be partly justified by strong earnings growth.

Apple (NYSE: AAPL) is the exception to that, with pedestrian single digit earnings growth, but that hasn’t stopped the stock from roaring higher.

While earnings can explain some of the rise in the US, the same can’t be said for Australia. EPS growth is likely to be close to flat for this calendar year, yet our market is up 23% this year. The rise is solely attributable to an increase in the price attached to the earnings, with the PE ratio rising from 17x to 22x for the ASX 200.

The extraordinary run of the Big 4 banks explains much of the market melt up. Commonwealth Bank’s share price has lifted 42% in 2024, excluding dividends, and it now trades at a 28x PE ratio – not bad for a company where earnings have declined of late!


Source: Morningstar

2. America IS the market

Australia has always taken its lead from US markets, though never more so than today.

We can talk about global markets but they’re not really global anymore – there’s America and then the rest.

US stocks now make up 65% of the global equity market. This is more than 11x bigger than the second largest country by market cap (Japan at 5.5%).

The last time that the US was at these levels was in the late 1960s when the America was at the peak of its power versus the rest of the world.

3. Markets love economic growth combined with disinflation

US inflation peaked at 9.1% in June 2022, and has since declined to 2.6%. It’s no coincidence that the S&P 500 bottomed soon after inflation peaked and has entered a roaring bull market since. There’s nothing more that markets love than a falling inflation rate combined with punchy economic growth.

Australia’s inflation rate peaked much later, at 7.8% in the fourth quarter of 2022. The rate has also been slower to fall, with the latest CPI reading at 2.8%.

This, plus lacklustre GDP growth, goes some way to explaining why Australia's share market has lagged the US and many other developed markets over the past two years.

The other thing that markets like about a falling inflation rate is that invariably leads to cuts to interest rates. Today, 71% of major central banks are in easing mode versus only 9% at the lows of July 2023. The RBA hasn't followed suit … yet.

4. Bitcoin is our tulip mania

There’s always a bubble somewhere, yet the Bitcoin one has been something to behold. It could go down in the history books as a modern-day tulip mania. Tulip mania, a speculative frenzy in 17th century Holland that involved the sale of tulip bulbs, is widely regarded as the biggest bubble in history.

Bitcoin might be rivalling that. It’s climbed 140% this year, after a gain of 156% the prior year. It’s up an annualised 149% since 2011. Put another way, one dollar invested in Bitcoin 14 years ago has turned into about $338,000.

Off shoots such as ‘meme coins’ are taking off. One of them, fartcoin (you read that right), recently rose 300% in one week and now has a total value of close to US$900 million.

MicroStrategy (NASDAQ: MSTR), whose main business is buying Bitcoin, has just been admitted to the Nasdaq 100 index with a market capitalization of US$98 billion. The share price is up a cool 546% this year. The company is run by a man who was charged with accounting fraud in the late 1990s tech bubble. And the company’s strategy seems to involve issuing new shares and debt to acquire more Bitcoin, which invariably pushes the Bitcoin price up – a seemingly virtuous circle. A flywheel to some, but a Ponzi scheme to others.


Source: Morningstar

The whole thing is likely to end in tears for one reason: Bitcoin has no real-world use. It was invented 16 years ago with hopes to decentralize the world of currencies. It’s done nothing of the sort and, ironically, may become a tool of the state, with Donald Trump’s plans for a Bitcoin strategic reserve.

5. Beware of investment bankers bearing gifts

I’ve always been bemused by the Australian media’s love affair with investment bankers, though it isn’t hard to figure out the reasons behind it. The bankers are a reservoir of gossip and ‘background’ information for journalists looking for a story.

My background in stockbroking and funds management has led to a more sceptical, nay cynical view, of these bankers.

So, the latest story involving DigiCo (ASX: DGT) hasn’t come as a surprise. For those who haven’t been following it, DigiCo is a date centre play recently listed in the ASX. It was quickly cobbled together by prominent former investment banker, David Di Pilla. DigiCo was the biggest float on the ASX since 2018, raising almost $2 billion in equity. There was a lot riding on the IPO.

It didn’t turn out as planned as the stock tanked 14% over the two days after listing. Di Pilla and his bankers are desperately trying to shore up the growth story, while retail investors, who gobbled up the IPO, have been left holding the can.

From the outset, there were many red flags with DigiCo as investment bankers rushed to put together a float based on the hot theme of AI.

It’s yet another reason to beware investment bankers bearing gifts…

6. Scale in superannuation comes with benefits and costs

Australia’s superannuation sector continued its unstoppable growth this year. Super assets now total more than $4 trillion, having increased 13% in the year to September, driven by strong asset returns.

Assets of superannuation entities

Source: APRA

Regulators have promoted consolidation in the sector, resulting in the big funds getting larger. Increased size has resulted in several benefits, including lower fees for members. However, the costs of increased scale are also becoming apparent, with more member complaints and heavier regulatory scrutiny.

Whether we’re expecting too much from the super funds may become a bigger issue going forward.

7. Smart money is backing private investment, further squeezing active equity managers

It always pays to look at where the smart money is investing, and there’s not many smarter in the financial sector than BlackRock’s CEO, Larry Fink. BlackRock is an ETF giant, having moved aggressively into the space with the acquisition of Barclays Global Investors in 2009.

It’s noteworthy that the firm is now moving aggressively into a new area: private investments. Recently it announced a US$12 billion acquisition of private credit firm HPS Investment Partners, which will turn into top five player in private credit. It comes two months after the company acquired infrastructure manager Global Infrastructure Partners.

These businesses appear to be small at first glance. The firm says alternatives will account for just 4% of its assets, compared to 67% for passive strategies. However, they’ll be heftier from a profit perspective. Blackrock expects alternatives to be around 25% of earnings, versus 40% for passive.

Fink and others see several tailwinds for private investment, including a pullback from banks in lending, fewer public listings and more companies choosing to stay private, and the ability to charge steeper fees vis-à-vis other asset classes such as equities.

BlackRock has ridden the wave of growth in passive investing, and with these acquisitions, it hopes to do the same in private investment.

With passive investment on the one hand and private investment on the other, active fund managers are being squeezed from both sides. The struggles of local fundies like Perpetual are testament to this.

8. The young are reaching for pitchforks on housing

For several decades, Governments, banks, and vested interests have been juicing housing returns with all their might. Younger generations have been slow to cotton on to the racket, but cotton on they have.

I’ve previously said that the Governments have no intention of doing much about housing, despite their endless announcements and soothing words to the masses. That’s for personal reasons, because the politicians have much of their own wealth tied up in housing, and for electoral reasons, because most voters own residential property.

This was clearly spelled out by the Federal Housing Minister, Clare O’Neil, in a recent interview with ABC youth radio station, Triple J. Pushed on whether she wanted to see house prices come down to give young people a chance to get into the market, she didn’t deflect like a good politician normally does.

“That might be the view of young people,” she said of the idea that sustained price falls are actually a good thing. “But it’s not the view of our government. We want to see sustainable price growth. We want to see more houses come online. We want to see that rental vacancy rate go up a bit … and we certainly want to see more homeowners.”

O’Neil’s interview went viral as Triple J listeners vented their anger at Government intentions to keep house prices rising, putting them further out of reach of younger people.

In a recent Firstlinks article, Alan Kohler, suggested the best outcome may be for policies to ensure that house prices stay stagnant for up to a few decades, allowing incomes to catch up to make housing affordable again.

Unfortunately, that benign scenario may be too long for the young, many of whom are angry about skyrocketing rents and being unable to afford to buy their own home.

9. The importance of staying invested and diversified

2024 has again proven that forecasting future is difficult, and it’s prudent to stay invested and diversified.

Many investors switched to cash in 2022 as both stocks and bonds swooned. Yet, holding more cash has been a significant drag on returns over the past few years.

On the flip side, retail and institutional investors are pouring money into US stocks today, hoping for a slice of the seemingly easy returns of 2023-2024. Whether that’s wise remains to be seen.

 

James Gruber is Editor of Firstlinks.

 

26 Comments
Hamish
December 24, 2024

Ah yes.. more Keynesians with a megaphone who have no idea about Bitcoin. It'll be 2044, there'll be 3 billion people on the network and these clowns will still be talking about tulips.

Just be intellectually honest enough to say you haven't done the work and you don't understand it.

Brian
December 24, 2024

Bitcoin currently only has value when it is confirmed as having been converted back into something else, typically in your bank account and cleared in USD / other currency.
It's not unique like that, but because it's basically new, governance and counterparty opaque, and intangible - well why punt anything other than play money on it if anything?
How it may develop over time - who knows.
Work with the tides, and keep your trunks on y'all!

Suresh Jain
December 23, 2024

For novice few questions.
How do I find a reliable, reputable broker/ dealer?
What happens to my purchase when brokers or dealers go bust or disappear?
How do I check the token or certificate or who can verify them ? Like assessor for Diamonds or Gold.

byron Scott
December 23, 2024

The bitcoin comments intrigued me. Many of them seem to misunderstand both the technical aspect of it, and the investment idea.
Technically it is extremely secure, but it is subject to accidental loss by inexperienced users. The same could be said of a normal bank account, but here there is a support system to correct many of the mistakes made. As for the assertion that the supply is not limited as there will be an incentive to print more - that cannot happen without creating a 'hard fork' in the system, in which case the new blockchain would not be bitcoin, but a new crypto which may or may not retain any value. The original bitcoin would continue. Btw, the last of the bitcoin will not be 'mined' until somewhere in the 2140s.
Bitcoin is not developing as a currency (though it might in the future).
It is a store of value, for the digital age.
It's traditional competitors in this field include Gold, Artwork, Diamonds, Property and collectibles. You will never buy groceries directly, with any of these, but they have a much better record of retaining value than the currencies we are familiar with - the USD has lost 99% of is value since the Federal Reserve was established in 1912!
The criminal use case often cited, has been and is, used equally by fiat currencies, especially as cash, which is, unlike bitcoin, untraceable. Human greed will adapt whatever is availlable to its needs.
The offshoot memecoins are purely gambling, and everyone understands that. Its not a scam, anymore than poker is a scam. There are however, a significant number of other tokens, or 'coins' which are developing use cases which will create real world value in this digital age which we are inevitably drawn into. Like shares listed on stockmarkets worlwide, not all of these will be successful, and it is up to investors to assess where value lies. These are not bitcoin though, just as gold is not silver or copper.
As for the comparison with a temporary fad such as 'tulip mania', it seems to be a rather prolonged one at 16 years, as the tulip phase lasted just 9 months, the 'South Sea Bubble' 2 -3 years, our year 2000 'dotcom' bubble also limited itself to 3 years.
Microstrategy is an interesting speculation. Its not a Ponzi scheme as there is no attempt to disguise the method of operation. One would only invest here on a personal certainty about the ongoing value of bitcoin - if it goes up, so does MSTR, and volatility is a builtin in feature/worry. The mention of 'accounting fraud' in connection with Michael Saylor was unfair as it does not tell the full story. Many now respected individuals have had significant bumps in their early ventures. (He was investigated in 2000 and reached a settlemement with the SEC for $350k, so no conviction here).
Bitcoin may or may not fulfill its original developer's vision, but it is certainly on a trajectory which makes it a significant element in our financial system and deserves consideration in modern financial planning. Personally, I am not happy with the way it is being absorbed into the mainstream via ETFs, Blackrock endorsement, and possible US gov strategic reserve, but it certainly mitigates against any future '$0' valuation.

Dan
December 23, 2024

Bitcoin envy.
Rather than educate yourself, you disparage a strategy that would have made your clients risk adjusted returns unbearable.
Comparing it to tulip mania seems so ignorant- we’re tulips the best performing asset over 14yrs?

James Gruber
December 27, 2024

Byron,

Informative comment, thank you.

michael
December 21, 2024

Thank you for the article. Surprised that all the comments are about Bitcoin, but here comes another one:
I have trouble reconciling the idea "proven use case for criminal enterprise " with the idea that the blockchain is fully traceable & therefore safe. These two ideas seem mutually exclusive.

Alan: I quoted you for convenience, not because I disagree. I think I agree with your comments.
I haven't invested in Bitcoin. Partly for the "no intrinsic value" reason, but also because it seems you can be robbed at any stage of the process. I don't know of any asset that can be stolen in so many ways.

Alan
December 21, 2024

There is more than a hint of irony in having a defender of Bitcoin question the journalistic integrity of James Gruber, who is as straight a shooter as you’ll find on financial matters. Setting aside the blockchain technology, quoting a series of predominantly aspirational uses for Bitcoin or crypto in general says little about how it derives intrinsic value beyond perhaps that of a scarce collectible, underpinned by zero real or potential cashflow. In which case the hope is for the current owner to exchange it for a higher amount of usually the same much maligned fiat currency it was purchased with.

A lot of parties with vested interests need to maintain the narrative of the moment to ensure this cycle of exchange keeps going. Yet beyond the obvious and proven use case for criminal enterprise and use of prolific amounts of energy, the aspect of society it shares the most characteristics with is gambling, that ever present desire of some human beings to extract a dollar from other human beings while delivering little more than a dopamine hit.

It is what it is, but don’t expect everyone to buy into the wishy-washy justifications. Just accept the adage that “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time”.

Steve
December 20, 2024

First up Firstlinks is owned by Morningstar. Every day Morningstar have a market valuation being the price/fair value (as estimated by Morningstar analysts) ratio. Today it is 1.11, at the start of the year it was about 1.0, meaning a fairly valued market. If we take this as a guide, the local market is about 11% overvalued. OK, not ideal but certainly not in mega-bubble territory. I always find it interesting that the Price/FV ratio never suggests any truly great excess (is 11% that extravagant?) , which seems at odds with many of the stories in the media. Of course this should only be a problem if you purchased all of your shares yesterday, or at least this month; you paid roughly 10% over the odds. If you bought them 6 months ago you probably paid 5% more than their "fair value" but you have made another 5% since so you're OK. So for an asset that goes up about 9%/yr, paying 10% over the odds means you have lost about 1 years increase. After this, you're good. And that's a poorer case scenario. Message is, don't sweat the small stuff.

Peter
December 20, 2024

Bitcoin will be used as a means to pay off the US debt. Watch and see :)

James Gruber
December 27, 2024

Peter,

What would happen to the US dollar, then? What would happen to the USD as a reserve currency? What impact would that have on US bonds and what price people will be willing to pay for them?

I can't see anything but very bad consequences for the US from this.

Or am I missing something?

Boomer Bob
December 20, 2024

my young fella got me onto the bitcoin and i couldn't be happier. beats any property or aussie stock. you can have them and i'll have my bitcoin. i can keep and build my wealth for 10,000 years on the bitcoin chain.

Jim
December 20, 2024

Maybe simplistic in the eyes of some, but the whole premise of Bitcoin is that at some point in the future someone will stump up cash (that's right, -cold hard cash) to purchase Bitcoin held by someone else.
That assumption is made with normal currency/legal tender - but many would argue that the implicit volatility of Bitcoin means that on that day of sale the value could be $0 - a much more risky option than legal tender.

Daryl O'Connor
December 19, 2024

The commentary on Bitcoin's place in the commercial landscape, particularly the comparison to tulip mania, is a gross oversimplification and a misrepresentation of the underlying technology and economic principles. Unlike tulips, Bitcoin has a finite supply, a transparent and decentralized network, and a growing number of real-world applications, such as cross-border payments, decentralized finance, and supply chain management. Tulips are just nice to look at.
The author's dismissal of MicroStrategy's strategy as a 'Ponzi scheme' is unfounded and ignores the potential long-term benefits of holding Bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset.

Unfortunately, the analysis presented in this piece is riddled with inaccuracies and oversimplifications. A more rigorous examination of Bitcoin's underlying technology, economic principles, and market dynamics is necessary to draw informed conclusions.

A more balanced assessment of Bitcoin's role in the commercial landscape would require a deeper dive into its technological innovations, regulatory developments, and potential future applications. It is essential for financial publications like Firstlinks to maintain high standards of journalistic integrity and to present information fairly and accurately.

CC
December 19, 2024

He did make the comment that the hope of decentralisation of finance has NOT been achieved, but quite the opposite if Trump has his way.
Blockchain technology is one thing, but thousands of meme coins with ridiculous names being used as gambling chips is another.

James Gruber
December 19, 2024

Daryl,

Do you use Bitcoin for one thing in your daily life? I don't and know of noone that does.

Until there is real-world application for you and I, I'll call it the way I see it - that's being fair and having integrity.

James

Gavin Latz
December 19, 2024

Hey James,

Bitcoin is a curious one. Use case? No (or hardly). Best performing asset over 10 years? Absolutely Yes.

Despite its question mark over how it is valued (and what value it even has etc) it’s proven it’s not a fad and isn’t a tulip type bubble - it’s just extremely volatile and not for the faint hearted.

..crypto (blockchain) absolutely has a place. But fartcoin and its many brothers and sisters. It’s taking way too long to remove 99% of crypto that is completely useless (and the biggest innovators in crypto want this) .

Talking about bubbles, I’d argue that’s the S&P500 right now over anything else. That will absolutely end in tears…

Ian Radbone
December 21, 2024

Perhaps it's that you don't know many Venezuelans or Argentinians, James.

Felix
December 27, 2024

Hi James
Thanks for your ascerbic and taunt articles - they are always good reading!
I was pleased to see that you were tackling bitcoin as it looms large in my portfolio and I like to read informed contrary viewpoints, as I do with any other holding. My views are similar to Byron Scott's.
I fear I was very disappointed in your casual and conventional dismissal - it suggested a very limited amount of background knowledge. Were you being assisted by AI?
I use Bitcoin now as a store of value, and I find it no more or less real than the ting my phone makes when I buy something. Both are essentially ledgers and for long term savings I prefer BTC.
There seems to be considerable interest in the subject Judging by the amount of comments you have stirred up - I hope FirstLinks will revisit it in a somewhat less partisan manner again.

James Gruber
December 27, 2024

Felix,

Thanks for your comments. Interested in:

Where is the value in Bitcoin?
What is the current fair value for it?
Can something be a store of value if it regularly goes up and down by +50% in a year?

Best,
James

James Gruber
December 27, 2024

Ian,

Venezuela and Argentina are hardly endorsements I would have thought.

And, it's still not the main currency used by either. Far from it.

James

Felix
December 28, 2024

James,
Yes, they are the difficult Buffet style questions! I would love to have a simple one word answers - but they have yet to occur to me!

Where is the value? Bitcoin already has many uses, and for those users there is obviously value in either easier, cheaper or more secure payments and transactions etc. In my case I consider BTC to be a potential store of value which will, I hope, allow me to pass on assets to the next generations worth at least as much as they have cost me. Of the alternatives, I have ruled out holding assets priced in USD as I do not think that the next century will be as beneficial to the US as the last. Gold has obvious drawbacks, A$ bonds don't sing to me, real estate is too illiquid and indivisible. Currency long term has not performed well. Index funds, hmm, perhaps if they are managed.

Current fair value? I don't think any of the techniques for assessing a company work for BTC. It would be like assessing fair value for the internet in 1980. I view simple technical analysis on a longer term price chart as being useful.

Volatility? Indeed the jury is out on that. I observe that MicroStrategy is now selling bonds with a 0% ticket and the argument that the volatility adds value. I think that as BTC grows volatility will decrease - but I don't want to wait that long!

All the best
Felix

Derek
January 17, 2025

My take away from this article by James is does valuation really matter?
"Talking about bubbles, I’d argue that’s the S&P500 right now over anything else. That will absolutely end in tears…" This comment is based on the presumption that valuation indeed does matter.
Maurizio Cattelan's duct-taped banana artwork titled 'Comedian' selling for US$5.2 million begs the question, what really is something worth.
Scarcity alone is not really an reason for higher valuations as shares just like bitcoin are not issued with gay abandon. As far as I can deduce, it all simply comes down to to Supply v Demand or vise versa. More buyers than sellers will naturally lead to higher valuations.

Stephen
December 20, 2024

Bitcoin does not have a finite supply. The supply is not limited by a resource constraint but by a convention. When the amount of Bitcoin that is supposed to be limited is coined, it us will be in the interest of suppliers to mint more, because that’s how they make money.

Bitcoins are usually purchased by so called stablecoins, that are supposed to be backed by collateral. However the holding of collateral is murky. The consequence is that stablecoins cannot be relied upon to be exchangeable for currency, particularly if many would need to be converted to cash in a rush.

Good luck that.

Hamish
December 23, 2024

Dunning Kruger in full effect

Derek
December 20, 2024

"Tulips are just nice to look at"... What is the inherent value of Bitcoin Daryl? How much fartcoin have you purchased lately? It sounds like a good investment, right?

I have no idea what your word salad is supposed to mean. The only "long term benefit' of any of these 'investments' is based on the expectation that someone else is the greater fool, to borrow Warren Buffetts words.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Is the speculative fever in 'hot stocks’ over?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, one year on

Last year, I wrote an article suggesting returns from ASX stocks would trample those from housing over the next decade. One year later, this is an update on how that forecast is going and what's changed since.

What to expect from the Australian property market in 2025

The housing market was subdued in 2024, and pessimism abounds as we start the new year. 2025 is likely to be a tale of two halves, with interest rate cuts fuelling a resurgence in buyer demand in the second half of the year.

Howard Marks warns of market froth

The renowned investor has penned his first investor letter for 2025 and it’s a ripper. He runs through what bubbles are, which ones he’s experienced, and whether today’s markets qualify as the third major bubble of this century.

9 lessons from 2024

Key lessons include expensive stocks can always get more expensive, Bitcoin is our tulip mania, follow the smart money, the young are coming with pitchforks on housing, and the importance of staying invested.

The 20 most popular articles of 2024

Check out the most-read Firstlinks articles from 2024. From '16 ASX stocks to buy and hold forever', to 'The best strategy to build income for life', and 'Where baby boomer wealth will end up', there's something for all.

2025: Another bullish year ahead for equities?

2024 was a banner year for equities, with a run-up in US tech stocks broadening into a global market rally, and the big question now is whether the good times can continue? History suggests optimism is warranted.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

The perfect portfolio for the next decade

This examines the performance of key asset classes and sub-sectors in 2024 and over longer timeframes, and the lessons that can be drawn for constructing an investment portfolio for the next decade.

Shares

The case for and against US stock market exceptionalism

The outlook for equities in 2025 has been dominated by one question: will the US market's supremacy continue? Whichever side of the debate you sit on, you should challenge yourself by considering the alternative.

Taxation

Negative gearing: is it a tax concession?

Negative gearing allows investors to deduct rental property expenses, including interest, from taxable income, but its tax concession status is debatable. The real issue lies in the favorable tax treatment of capital gains. 

Investing

How can you not be bullish the US?

Trump's election has turbocharged US equities, but can that outperformance continue? Expensive valuations, rising bond yields, and a potential narrowing of EPS growth versus the rest of the world, are risks.

Planning

Navigating broken relationships and untangling assets

Untangling assets after a broken relationship can be daunting. But approaching the situation fully informed, in good health and with open communication can make the process more manageable and less costly.

Beware the bond vigilantes in Australia

Unlike their peers in the US and UK, policy makers in Australia haven't faced a bond market rebellion in recent times. This could change if current levels of issuance at the state and territory level continue.

Retirement

What you need to know about retirement village contracts

Retirement village contracts often require significant upfront payments, with residents losing control over their money. While they may offer a '100% share in capital gain', it's important to look at the numbers before committing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.