Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 40

There’s too much confidence in confidence surveys

Some of us worry more than we should: what if this happens, what if that happens?

That said, truly awful events and disasters do make us at least wiser and cautionary. Bushfire losses, floods, typhoons, economic depressions, nasty car accidents, burglary, serious assault and other traumatic episodes in our lives or the lives of others can be traumatic.

But there are usually more good things, progress and happiness in our lives than bad things.

We live longer than any generation since the days of Methuselah. We have cures or preventions for all manner of ills and pains. We are safer at work, at leisure, in sport and on the roads. We live in dwellings with far greater comfort than mansions and castles of old.

Our standard of living is rising exponentially with only some setbacks from time to time as the first exhibit shows convincingly. We have had four depressions and 22 recessions over the past 225 years from 1788, but they are well and truly outweighed by growth years. Our standard of living today is 4½ times higher than 1913, and over 9 times that of 1813, 200 years ago.

Even if we take a much shorter time frame - the last half century - the news is still good, as the second exhibit reveals: only three recessions, and none in over 20 years since 1992.

These days we measure confidence as well as talk about it. Before 1970, talk is all we could do as there was only opinion, anecdotal evidence and scuttlebutt.

The Consumer Sentiment Index (CSI), created monthly by the Westpac/Melbourne Institute tells us about the propensity to spend money at the household level. It’s important given that household expenditure accounts for 54% of the economy directly, and over three-quarters of the economy indirectly via our taxes and housing capital expenditure. It shows quite volatile changes at times, as we will see shortly, but is a good bell-weather indicator of the economy for 3-6 months in advance.

But businesses need to be careful to avoid long term decisions based on consumer confidence, as they are based on short term perceptions by individuals. Most people do not think much further out than 9-12 months on most things except perhaps schooling, holidays and a change of residence. Business decisions, especially about strategy and capital expenditure, require time frames of 3-5 years and often longer. That is where business confidence indicators are more relevant.

So, where does consumer confidence fit in all of this?  Firstly, it should be said that growth in consumption expenditure - over 70% of the economy - has never been negative in any year since the end of World War II. It may be taking a step too far to suggest we can thank female steadiness for this, unlike criticising males for the opposite with investment. Boards of directors are over 85% males and the volatility in capital expenditure range is enormous (+12% growth to 10% falls!) compared with consumption expenditure with a range of 1-5%, and all positive.

Of course, consumer sentiment can turn negative even if spending doesn’t. The third chart shows the 12 month progressive average of the CSI over the past 40 years. At 100 points there is a 50:50 split between positive or negative opinions for the year ahead. Anything below 100 points could be a worry, except history shows that the index has to fall below 83 points for a recession to eventuate. That has occurred only twice over this period, in 1982-83 and 1991-92.

So there is a dichotomy between this volatility (± 15 or more points), and much narrower 1-5% spread (all positive) in actual consumption spending, as said before.

And should anyone still think we aren’t all that confident, a look at the history of the CSI in the UK, the fourth chart below, should render them silent if not speechless at the near-perpetual misery in the Old Dart. How do you make a Pom happy for more than four or five years in a century?

The irony is that up until the GFC in late 2008, the UK economy had been growing at a somewhat similar rate of growth as Australia. Perceptions, national psyches and inherent cultures are often at odds with reality.

Confidence is important but can be misleading in terms of what is actually going on. Our emotions, which make us human, need to be balanced by facts from time to time to remind us that things are rarely as grim as they seem, are not grim for long, and we should celebrate the immense progress in longevity, health, living conditions, leisure and happiness.

Often.

 

Phil Ruthven is chairman of IBISWorld, Australia’s best-known business information corporation, and he is also a director of other companies, advisory boards and charitable organisations.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Animal spirits dormant except for coffee and food

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirement is a risky business for most people

While encouraging people to draw down on their accumulated wealth in retirement might be good public policy, several million retirees disagree because they are purposefully conserving that capital. It’s time for a different approach.

The perfect portfolio for the next decade

This examines the performance of key asset classes and sub-sectors in 2024 and over longer timeframes, and the lessons that can be drawn for constructing an investment portfolio for the next decade.

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

The challenges with building a dividend portfolio

Getting regular, growing income from stocks is tougher with the dividend yield on the ASX nearing 25-year lows. Here are some conventional and not-so-conventional ideas for investors wanting to build a dividend portfolio.

How much do you need to retire?

Australians are used to hearing dire warnings that they don't have enough saved for a comfortable retirement. Yet most people need to save a lot less than you might think — as long as they meet an important condition.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 594 with weekend update

It’s well documented that many retirees draw down the minimum amount required and die with much of their super balances untouched. This explores the reasons why and some potential solutions to address the issue.

  • 16 January 2025

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

9 ways to fix Australia's housing crisis

Decades of policy failure have induced a fall in housing affordability. Unless painful changes are made, an underclass will emerge in a society that is supposed to boast the one of the world's highest standards of living.

Shares

Australia: why the chase for even higher dividend yields?

Australia boasts one of the world's highest dividend yielding sharemarkets, providing substantial benefits to investors and retirees. Despite this, individuals often stretch for even more yield, to their detriment.

Shares

MIGA – Make Income Great Again

The Australian sharemarket seems to be rewarding a number of unprofitable companies on the promise of future riches. Yet profits and cashflows still matter, as a recent case study of Domino's Pizza shows.

Shares

Mapping future US market returns

Exceptional returns from the US sharemarket over the past decade have driven by sales growth, margin expansion, rising valuations, and dividends. Predicting future returns requires careful consideration of these factors.

Shares

Read this before you go all in on US equities

US equities rule global markets, but history is littered with examples of markets that seemed invincible — until they weren’t. Diversification will be key for investor portfolios going forwards.

Property

What impact would scrapping stamp duty have on housing?

Increasing house prices pose challenges for housing affordability. This investigates the impact of stamp duty on the property market, and how removing the tax could help address several key issues.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.