Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 608

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 608

  •   24 April 2025
  • 11
  •      
  •   

Given the current rental crisis across many parts of the country, The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI) has released a timely new report that profiles residential property landlords: who they are, who buys rental properties and who sells them, and how long they hold onto their investments.

The study, ‘Modelling landlord behaviour and its impact on rental affordability: Insights across two decades’ covers 2001-2021 and includes recommendations for government policy, which we’ll get to later.

Here are they key findings of the report:

1. More people are residential property landlords than ever before.

In 2021, 2.2 million Australians were landlords, accounting for about 8.7% of the population. That’s up from 6.8% two decades ago.

2. Most rental properties are sold within a short period of time.

50% of rental properties are sold within two years and the average holding period is four years. About 28% of rental properties are retained beyond 20 years.

3. Buyers of rental properties are generally younger.

Many buyers are aged between 25 and 34. The typically profile of a buyer is also that they’re married, employed, have post-school education qualifications, higher incomes, and lower personal mortgage burdens, relative to outright owning.

Those who retain their rental properties for longer tend to be in stronger economic positions with full-time employment and higher incomes.

4. Landlords sell rental properties due to life transitions or financial difficulty.

The odds of selling a rental investment property in the short-term are raised among pre-retirement landlords aged 45-54 years, by marital separation, unemployment, the absence of post-school qualifications, lower incomes, and personal mortgage burdens.

5. People living in well-off areas are more likely to buy a rental investment property, but they’re also more likely to sell the property in the short-term.

6. Investment property purchases increase when economic conditions are strong.

(Unsurprising)

7. Negative gearing discourages the sale of rental investment properties and increases the average holding period for rental investments.

All things being equal, negative gearing provides significant incentives for landlords to hold onto properties. Being negatively geared reduces the odds of selling over time by nearly 20%.

If negative gearing was removed, it would increase the after-tax cost of holding a rental property and reduce the average hold period for rental investments. A one percentage point increase in the cost for holding rental properties raises the odds of selling over time by 8.9%.

8. Cutting the capital gains discount would reduce the supply of rental properties and push up rents.

The study did simulated models halving the CGT discount from 50% to 25% over the period 2001-2021, and found that landlord costs would increase, as would the chance that high income landlords sell their rental investment properties. It also found that average rents would have risen slightly, and rental cost burdens would have increased across all income groups.

Policy recommendations

While the report’s findings are enlightening, its policy recommendations are less so. The three main recommendations are:

  • Establishing programs that offer education on property investment retention. This is to support landlords’ efforts to retain property and promote the supply of long-term rental housing to the rental property market.
  • Any tax reforms such as reducing negative gearing should be done gradually to reduce the impact on rental markets. That’s because negative gearing benefits encourage the retention of rental investment properties, and decreasing these benefits suddenly would lead to a jump in rental property sales and a drop of properties available to renters.
  • Long-term freezes to rental increases aren’t the answer. That’s because it would discourage the buying and retaining of rental properties, thereby reducing the supply of housing into the private rental market.

While the report focuses on landlords and what can be done to encourage them to buy and hold onto properties, there are other things that are needed to increase the supply of housing into the rental market, including:

  • Incentivising new developments.
    Governments can offer incentives such as reduced development costs and tax breaks to encourage builders to construct more rental properties.
  • Reducing planning red tape.
    There needs to be faster approvals for developers to help speed up the building of more rental homes.
  • Increase institutional investment in the rental market.
    Make it more attractive for institutional investors to enter the rental market by giving them tax incentives and promoting long-term leases.
  • Encourage older people to downsize.
    Reduce stamp duty and other impediments to downsizing. This can increase the supply of larger properties for families.

The AHIRU study provides valuable insights into landlords and some clues about how to fix the rental property market. These issues have been neglected at this Federal Election, which has focused almost exclusively on home buyers over renters. As houses become ever more unaffordable, forcing more people into renting, I suspect the rental market will become a more visible issue in future elections.

****

How much time have you spent reading about Trump and tariffs over the past two months? And how much of that time has been useful for your investing? If you're like me, the answers are: a lot, and zero. In my article this week, I urge investors to ignore Trump and instead focus on the time-tested investing principles for building real wealth. 

James Gruber

Also in this week's edition...

Even experienced investors often fail to exploit the underlying potential of dividends. Why? Their focus typically diverts to high current yields. Josh Veltman and Jen Nurick suggest an alternative approach that can offer both a strategic edge and psychological anchor.

Labor has announced a $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, aimed at slashing the cost of home batteries. Open to all households, small businesses and community groups, the scheme aims to turbocharge battery uptake nationwide. Noel Whittaker says while good in theory, the scheme has several drawbacks.

Chinese electric vehicles have taken the world by storm. But with soaring tariffs, overcapacity, and rising scrutiny, they may face tougher times ahead, according to Carolyn Cui.

REITs have suffered in recent years from rising interest rates and trends such as work-from-home. Yet, since Trump's election, they started to quietly outperform. Can it continue? Resolution Capital's Andrew Parsons thinks REITs can offer a potential safe haven in a more volatile, Trumpian world.

European equities are surging ahead of the U.S this year, driven by strong earnings, undervaluation, and fiscal stimulus. With quality founder-led firms and a strengthening euro, Garry Laurence believes Europe may be the next global investment hotspot.

The Federal Treasurer, Jim Chalmers, has repeatedly trotted out the line that “there’s been a $207 billion cumulative improvement to the budget bottom line" since Labor took office. Tony Dillon says it's a rubbery claim that warrants further scrutiny.

Traditionally, duration – a measure of a bond portfolio’s sensitivity to interest rates – was the bedrock of defensive allocations in investor portfolios. However, in more recent times, this has changed - duration has been in the doghouse. Today, an important question is whether duration is still something to be feared. Haran Karunakaran of Capital Group suggests investors could benefit from adding a moderate amount of duration back into their portfolios.

In Firstlinks, we've written quite a bit about Australia's $5.4 trillion intergenerational wealth transfer, the largest in its history. This unprecedented shift is prompting many Australians to rethink the question of legacy: What do I truly want to leave behind? In response, many are turning to philanthropy. Rachael Rofe outlines how structured giving vehicles can maximise the impact of your legacy while making estate planning more tax efficient.

Lastly in this week's whitepaper, Magellan looks at the future of transport and the innovations that are transforming how we move.

Curated by James Gruber and Leisa Bell

A full PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles will be loaded into this editorial on our website by midday.

Latest updates

PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter

ASX Listed Bond and Hybrid rate sheet from NAB/nabtrade

Monthly Bond and Hybrid updates from ASX

Listed Investment Company (LIC) Indicative NTA Report from Bell Potter

LIC Monthly Report from Morningstar

Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website

 

11 Comments
billy
April 24, 2025

"Cutting the capital gains discount would reduce the supply of rental properties and push up rents"

Properties don't disappear off the face of the earth if the property is sold and comes off the supply of rental properties. The property is purchased by an owner occupier, which means one less property on the supply side and one less family wanting to rent on the demand side. Overall no change

JohnS
April 24, 2025

Why not simply revert to the old CGT method.

Increase the cost base by inflation and tax the after indexation gain

Logical - there is no logical reason for a 50% discount, it is an arbitrary number, indexing has an inherent logic

Former Treasury policy maker
April 24, 2025

There was - and is - a logical reason. 50% was chosen as a proxy for the inflation uplift over the average holding time for investments. This was an excellent simplification of the calculation, which is otherwise a little complex and open to dispute about what inflation was over the holding period.
By all means review the policy, but please understand that it was logical. It remains logical though a smaller discount would be justifiable since inflation is far less than it was in the past.

Ian Wallis
April 24, 2025

It seems the 50 % discount could be considered "logical" only if people cannot do simple arithmetic and the ATO cannot list a cost index (by State or region) on their website.

Former Treasury policy maker
April 25, 2025

Well, Ian, in practice the complication was that instead of just putting the purchase and sale prices in, the ATO had to verify the purchase and sales dates. Not just a case of publishing indices but verifying that the taxpayer had used the ones that aligned with those dates. Led to arguments about who was right and a lot of extra administrative checking. One of the first rules fir good tax policy is to keep it simple and minimise the administration costs. So it was perfectly logical to anyone who passed Public Finance 1.01.

John Wilson
April 25, 2025

I totally disagree with the "simplicity" argument for Costello's introduction of the 50% discount on capital gains. While it wasn't so egregious when there was the high inflation of the 1980's, it's ridiculous now with the low inflation up till 2022. What is particularly ridiculous is that there is zero discount up to 365 days, and 50% discount from day 366 on! That means that I retain shares until the 1 year is up, then sell them!
Far better was Keating's taxation based on the real capital gain - ie after allowing for inflation. That reflected the true realised earnings. It was a doddle to administer: just maintain the index of whatever the inflation measure was, and apply that.
Please bring back the one thing that Keating did well!

Greg Hollands
April 24, 2025

So, the above study shows, in general, that the arguments against negative gearing are total BS. Negative gearing supports landlords, allows more rental properties to be available in the marketplace, provides income support via the tax system which puts a dampening effect upon general rental levels. I would have thought that all of those impacts were generally good for Australians. There is no case to be made out for abolishing negative gearing as per the deluded Greens, who appear to have a marxist view only and ignore the economics - as you would expect!

CC
April 24, 2025

Australia is about the only country in the world that has negative gearing.
In the USA, the land of capitalism, home owners are allowed tax deductions on mortgage interest payments up till a point, but here in Australia it is investors who must get looked after and the property market supposedly cannot cope without it and it's
sacrilege to consider change. If negative gearing is so good at providing more rental properties, why then is our market here so absurdly expensive, tight and difficult when the rest of world doesn't have negative gearing?

Neil
April 25, 2025

CC, can you explain why it is OK for rental income to be included in your assessable income, but it is not OK to allow as a deduction one of the significant costs of generating that income, namely interest expense?

Alex
April 24, 2025

As much as I share your dislike of the Greens, the ideas that "negative gearing supports landlords" and "allows more rental properties to be available in the markets" are equally utter BS. The tax benefit of negative gearing is not worth it if the landlord is bleeding cash, that's why many "investors" sell within 2 years and the holding average is only 4 years, as this article says.

No rational (or at least reasonable) investors would take on a significant amount of debt to acquire a negative yielding assets in the first place, even if it comes with tax benefits.

CC
April 24, 2025

It feels like Australia has sold it's soul for a never ending property bubble

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Finding the best income-yielding assets

With fixed term deposit rates declining and bank hybrids being phased out, what are the best options for investors seeking income? This goes through the choices, and the opportunities and risks involved.

What history reveals about market corrections and crashes

The S&P 500's recent correction raises concerns about a bear market. History shows corrections are driven by high rates, unemployment, or global shocks, and that there's reason for optimism for nervous investors today. 

Howard Marks: the investing game has changed

The famed investor says the rapid switch from globalisation to trade wars is the biggest upheaval in the investing environment since World War Two. And a new world requires a different investment approach.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 605 with weekend update

Trump's tariffs and China's retaliatory strike have sent the Nasdaq into a bear market with the S&P 500 not far behind. What are the implications for the economy and markets, and what should investors do now? 

  • 3 April 2025

Designing a life, with money to spare

Are you living your life by default or by design? It strikes me that many people are doing the former and living according to others’ expectations of them, leading to poor choices including with their finances.

World's largest asset manager wants to revolutionise your portfolio

Larry Fink is one of the smartest people in the finance industry. In his latest shareholder letter, the Blackrock CEO outlines his quest to become the biggest player in private assets and upend investor portfolios.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

An enlightened dividend path

While many chase high yields, true investment power lies in companies that steadily grow dividends. This strategy, rooted in patience and discipline, quietly compounds wealth and anchors investors through market turbulence.

Investment strategies

Don't let Trump derail your wealth creation plans

If you want to build wealth over the long-term, trying to guess the stock market's next move is generally a bad idea. In a month where this might be more tempting than ever, here is what you should focus on instead.

Economics

Pros and cons of Labor's home batteries scheme

Labor has announced a $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, aimed at slashing the cost of home batteries. The goal is to turbocharge battery uptake, though practical difficulties may prevent that happening.

Investment strategies

Will China's EV boom end in tears?

China's EV dominance is reshaping global auto markets - but with soaring tariffs, overcapacity, and rising scrutiny, the industry’s meteoric rise may face a turbulent road ahead. Can China maintain its lead - or will it stall?

Investment strategies

REITs: a haven in a Trumpian world?

Equity markets have been lashed by Trump's tariff policies, yet REITs have outperformed. Not only are they largely unaffected by tariffs, but they offer a unique combination of growth, sound fundamentals, and value.

Shares

Why Europe is back on the global investor map

European equities are surging ahead of the U.S this year, driven by strong earnings, undervaluation, and fiscal stimulus. With quality founder-led firms and a strengthening Euro, Europe may be the next global investment hotspot.

Chalmers' disingenuous budget claims

The Treasurer often touts a $207 billion improvement in Australia's financial position. A deeper look at the numbers reveals something less impressive, caused far more by commodity price surprises than policy.

Fixed interest

Duration: Friend or foe in a defensive allocation?

Duration is back. After years in the doghouse, shifting markets and higher yields are restoring its role as a reliable diversifier and income source - offering defensive strength in today’s uncertain environment.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.