Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 574

With rates peaking, the time for bonds has come

Six months. That’s roughly the time frame that the Reserve Bank’s governor, Michele Bullock, has given for when the RBA’s board is likely to feel more comfortable around cutting interest rates. Indeed, Australia may well be one of the last of the major developed countries to start cutting rates.

For investors seeking long-term diversification with high-quality bonds, it may be a case of make hay now while the sunshine from higher interest rates is still burning bright.

Bonds tend to outperform after rates hit their peak

While there may be flexibility around the timing of rate cuts in Australia – which will ultimately come down to how quickly inflation levels fall back inside the RBA’s target band – it’s likely we’re at or near the end of the rate hiking cycle, which has historically been associated with a peak in yields. This is good news for bonds, which have typically performed strongly in the years following the peak.

What happens when rate hikes end?

Figure 1: Annualised performance following the rate hike cycle*


Notes: 1994 rate hiking cycle, which commenced July 1994 to first Tuesday of December 1994, so 30 November is used as a start date for 1994. 1998-2008 rate hiking cycle, which commenced October 1999 to first Tuesday of March 2008, so 29 Feb 2008 used as start date for 1998-2008 hiking cycle. 2009 rate hiking cycle, which commenced September 2009 to first Tuesday of November 2010, so 31 October 2010 used as a start date for 2009 hiking cycle.
Source: Vanguard and Bloomberg

For those entering the bond market now, there’s an opportunity to enjoy historically higher yields while potentially benefitting from short-term price tailwinds when rates do start to fall.

Given that bonds have only recently emerged from a tumultuous period of rapidly rising rates, it’s understandable that some investors may be cautious. Many investors may be waiting for the RBA and other central banks to finish hiking—or even begin cutting—before they jump back into bonds. But, as is also the case with equities, trying to time market movements is always a risky venture. Waiting for the ‘right’ moment to review your bond exposure may mean missing out on a price boost when expectations shift to looming rate cuts. Moreover, it could mean missing out on the rate peak and the full benefits from higher yields.

What if interest rates stay high?

Even when rates do move lower, we don’t foresee a return to the COVID levels when Australian interest rates were at historical lows, nearing zero. That was an extraordinary time.

The return to sound money – when interest rates are above the rate of inflation – may be one of the most important developments in financial markets in the past two decades. According to Vanguard’s research, the neutral (or equilibrium) rate has increased by around 1% on average across developed markets, mainly driven by ageing demographics and higher structural fiscal deficits. While higher-for-longer rates might be painful for borrowers, they’re a good thing for investors over the long run, particularly for bond investors. In fact, we expect investors to be better off because of (not in spite of) higher rates.

As the chart below shows, bond prices were pushed down by rising rates in 2021 and 2022. However, higher yields and coupon payments make up for short-term principal losses over time. That’s why we now expect bond investors who remain invested to be better off in end-of-period wealth terms by the end of the decade.

Figure 2: Australian bonds forecasts*


Important: The projections and other information generated by the VCMM regarding the likelihood of various investment outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results, and are not guarantees of future results. Distribution of return outcomes from VCMM are derived from 10,000 simulations for each modeled asset class. Simulations as of 31 December 2021, and 31 March 2024. Results from the model may vary with each use and over time. For more information, please click here.

Notes: The chart shows actual returns for the Bloomberg Australian Aggregate Bond Index along with Vanguard’s forecast for cumulative returns over the subsequent 10 years as of 31 December 2021, and 31 March 2024. The dashed lines represent the 10th and 90th percentiles of the forecasted distribution. Data as of 31 March 2024.
Sources: Vanguard calculations, using 31 March 2024, VCMM simulations and data from Bloomberg.

This doesn’t mean that investors won’t potentially realise losses in the short term as yields move around, or that they’re guaranteed profits in the long term. But when assessing the impact of higher yields, your time horizon as an investor matters a lot.

Investors are returning to bonds

If we take a look at exchange traded fund (ETF) flows, it’s clear that investors have been returning to the bond market. In 2023, strong renewed interest in bond ETFs saw fixed income flows reach almost 45% of total market flows. Australian bond ETFs received $3.81 billion in cash flows in 2023, a 37% improvement year on year. Global bond ETFs also attracted $1.5 billion over the year, up 99% year on year. This momentum continued with a further $1.5 billion added across Australian and global bond ETFs in the first half of 2024.

We anticipate bond ETFs will remain popular with Australian investors throughout the remainder of 2024 and beyond, particularly as our domestic bond return expectations have substantially increased since 2022 from 1.3%–2.3% per annum to 4.1%–5.1% per annum over the next 10 years.

Similarly, for global bonds, we expect returns of 4.3%–5.3% per annum over the next decade, compared with a forecast of 1.6%–2.6% per annum when policy rates were low or, in some cases, negative.

With higher yields, the benefit to long-term investors of being invested in bonds should outweigh the cost of being a little early should yields remain flat or even edge up slightly before the rate cuts hit.

Timing the market is often harder than we think, and getting timing decisions wrong can mean limiting your returns in the long run. For most investors, a prudent asset allocation that includes both equities and bonds, matched with a long-term investment plan, may present a better chance for investment success.

 

* Past performance information is given for illustrative purposes only and should not be relied upon as, and is not, an indication of future performance. The performance of an index is not an exact representation of any particular investment, as you cannot invest directly in an index.

 

Jean Bauler is Head of Fixed Income at Vanguard Australia, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only. Vanguard has not taken your objectives, financial situation or needs into account when preparing this article so it may not be applicable to the particular situation you are considering.

For more articles and papers from Vanguard Investments Australia, please click here.

 

5 Comments
James Gruber
August 22, 2024

Hi Warren,

It's my title, not the author's, so it's on me. And in hindsight, I think you're right.

Best,
James

Warren Bird
August 22, 2024

I'll start by saying that I agree with the final statement in the article about prudent asset allocations and long term investment plans. That's a completely different proposition to the headline, however, which I find somewhat problematic.

A question: was this opinion piece written yesterday, when Australian 10 year government bond yields were paying 3.9% yield and the average in the market was more like 3.5%, or was it written a few weeks ago when yields were nearer 4.5%? This makes a world of difference to how one might react to the opinion that's been shared.

Further, to understand what the chart is really telling us about bond performance after rate hiking cycles, we need to know at least two bits of information that are not provided. The returns over 1 and 3 years shown all involve an on-going yield being earned, to which is added the capital appreciation from falling yields. So we need to know both the starting yield and the degree to which market yields subsequently declined. In none of the periods shown in the chart was the starting yield as low as it is today.

1994 is the most stark illustration of this. The starting point is said to be November 1994. The average yield on bonds in the index back then was around 10% at that time. So most of that 14.5% return over the subsequent 3 years was simply the yield of the bonds generating underlying income. The rest came from capital appreciation as yields declined over the next few years - mostly in the very first year, hence the 19% one year return shown - offset by some fall in reinvestment earnings because of the same fall in yields (which reduces income).

So even if the premise in the article is correct, there is no way we're going to get double digit bond returns over the next 1 and 3 years. We're starting from a massively lower yield.

This is immediately obvious even from the other two periods shown in the chart. They have lower returns than the 1994 episode mostly because they started at lower yields. Lower starting yields also limit the extent to which yields can subsequently fall and thus the size of capital appreciation over 1 and 3 years.

Buy the Australian bond market today and you're acquiring a portfolio that yields you about 3.5% - 4.0%. That tells me - without doing a lot of fancy analysis - that it will return you about 3.5-4.0% per annum over the next 7-10 years. Bonds in the end pay income and all bonds mature at par, so capital appreciation mostly washes out over that sort of time period. The article mentions 4.1-5.1% as a 10 year projection, so I suspect the analysis was done a few weeks ago when yields were higher.

If the thesis in the article plays out then yields might fall by about 1% from here. That will generate about 4-5% of capital appreciation, depending on the duration of your portfolio. So in the short term, some attractive returns could be on offer. That argument to me was much more compelling a year ago when 10 year Australian government bond yields hit 5%. That yield represented very good long term value. Today does not offer the same compelling value in my view.

But in any case, if you're going to enter the bond market at any time, you do need to understand that it's basically about the income it pays you over the long term. That's reliable and predictable. You might be able to get into the market at a good time and get some short additional returns - as in the 3 periods shown in the article - but even then I urge you to understand what's actually driving those outcomes so you can form realistic expectations of what your investment might deliver.

All of this is good news for folk who have investments in 'conservative' options in their super. They had a rough time during 2022 when inflation and bond yields took off. They'll seen better results over the last 12 months as higher yields kicked in to drive their returns. If the thesis of this article plays out then there's a bit more short term boost to come, but in any case the bond market is currently priced to pay a rate of income that is more aligned with long term expectations for such funds. Prudent asset allocation and long run strategies should continue to be rewarded over time.

Steve
August 22, 2024

I recall 1994 well. This analysis comment is accurate. And why Metrics is doing so well today.

Warren Bird
August 22, 2024

As do I Steve. Though as much as the pain of the negative returns during 1994 was awful, the thing I recall the most was how few bond managers took the chance to extend duration when yields were over 10%. Everyone was forecasting they'd go higher and didn't buy. They missed the last great chance we had to lock in such great value yields. Within a year they were back at 8% and we've been nowhere near 10% ever since.
I did buy, in the funds I managed at the time, and it led me to develop the valuation framework on which I later built the bond business at Colonial First State.
So I owe a bit to 1994. It was quite a learning experience.

Dudley
August 22, 2024

"That argument to me was much more compelling a year ago when 10 year Australian government bond yields hit 5%. That yield represented very good long term value. Today does not offer the same compelling value in my view.":

Would be good if you would provide some illustrative numeric examples. (I'm busy.)

How to Calculate a Bond's Yield to Maturity (Using Excel)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRoN4ScZmHY
Uses excel RATE and IRR functions.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Why we believe bonds are now beautiful

This vital yet "forgotten" indicator of inflation holds good news

Will the RBA cut rates before the Fed?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Warren Buffett changes his mind at age 93

This month, Buffett made waves by revealing he’d sold almost 50% of his shares in Apple in the second quarter. The sale not only shows that Buffett has changed his mind on the stock but remains at the peak of his powers.

Wealth transfer isn't just about 'saving it up and passing it on'

We’ve seen how the transfer of wealth can work well, with inherited wealth helping families grow and thrive for generations, as well as how things can go horribly wrong. Here are tips on how to get it right.

A health scare changes my investment plans

Recently, I spent time in hospital for pneumonia. Health issues can clarify what really matters, and one thing became clear to me: 99% of what we think is important is either irrelevant or doesn’t need our immediate attention.

CPI may understate the rising costs of retirement

Rising prices have a big impact on retirement outcomes yet our most common gauge of inflation – the consumer price index – misses several important household costs for retirees.

Rethinking how retirees view the family home

Australia faces a wave of retirees at a stage where the superannuation system is still maturing. Better and fairer policy on the role of the family home as a retirement asset might help.

The tortoise wins in investing

For decades, it’s been a truism that taking greater risks with stocks should equate to higher returns. New research casts doubt on that and suggests investing in ‘boring’ stocks and industries may be a better bet.

Latest Updates

Being right versus making money

Looking back on my own investing, one recurring theme has been a desire to prove that I’m right. Everyone has cognitive biases like this, and the key is to have an investment plan that protects us from acting on our worst instincts.

Shares

Warren Buffett's sweetest investment

One of Buffett's most successful investments has been a confectionery company that he bought more than 50 years ago. The investment demonstrates that stocks need not be growth companies to create fortunes.

Superannuation

What happens to your super when you die?

Nominating beneficiaries with your super fund is the only way to direct your death benefits to the people you want to receive it. The steps you take will depend on your circumstances and who your intended beneficiaries are.

Shares

Why buying speculative stocks often proves irresistible

So you want to buy a speculative stock in the hope that it goes to the moon and you can retire in the Bahamas. There's only one problem - once you start purchasing these types of stocks, it's often hard to stop.

Fixed interest

With rates peaking, the time for bonds has come

It’s likely we’re at or near the end of the rate hiking cycle, which has historically been associated with a peak in yields. This is good news for bonds, which have typically performed strongly in the years following the peak.

Gold

Gold’s role in portfolios amidst rising interest rate volatility

Volatility in interest rate expectations and elevated yields may amplify traditional portfolio risks. Gold has a low correlation to equities and bonds and can help improve the performance of portfolios.

Investment strategies

Why Olympic bronze medallists are happier than silver medallists

Studies reveal silver to many athletes feels like they have lost, while bronze medallists often think they have won by making it onto the podium ahead of the rest of the field. This has lessons for investors too.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.