Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 490

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 490 with weekend update

  •   5 January 2023
  • 10
  •      
  •   

The Weekend Edition includes a market update (after the editorial) plus Morningstar adds links to two additional articles.

The best investors have a similar trait to the best gamblers: they bet when the odds are overwhelmingly in their favour.

Former ‘bond king’ Bill Gross, of Pimco fame, discovered this at an early age.

His path to finance began by chance. He was in his final year of college when he had a car accident which sliced open his scalp. While bedridden, he read a book called Beat the Dealer by Edward Thorp, who was then a maths professor.

Written in 1962, the book detailed how you could win at blackjack by using a system for counting cards. When Gross recovered, he went straight to Las Vegas, where he played 16 hours a day over the next four months. He turned his initial US$200 into US$10,000.

Once done, his thoughts turned to what to do with his future. He later recalled:

“I said, well, I obviously enjoy mathematical application of a system of some sort, and hard work, and diligence. What’s the adult form of gambling? It’s the stock market. Maybe you can’t outfox it, but let’s see if it can be done. Right then and there I said, ‘I’m getting into the money management business.’”

The rest is history.

Randomised luck versus systematic edge

Most people think of gambling as randomized luck. And they’re largely right. At a casino, the casino normally has the advantage.

For instance, you can go to a casino and play blackjack. The dealer will give you, and all other players, two cards face up, while the dealer gets one card face up and another face down. From there, the aim is to get as close to cards totalling 21 as possible, without going over.

But your chances of winning a hand are 42.22%, while the odds of a tie are 8.48%. Conversely, the odds of the casino winning are 49.3%. That’s because the casino dealer has the advantage of going second and can make decisions based on your position. You may get lucky for a few hands, yet if you play long enough, the statistical odds will come back to beat you.

Bill Gross wasn’t interested in relying on randomized luck though. When he read Thorp’s book, he saw a system of counting cards that could tilt the odds in his favour. He then applied that odds-based mentality to give him an edge in bond markets.

‘A man for all markets’

Edward Thorp went on to have an amazing career too. He wrote ‘Beat the Dealer’ when he was 30 and the book not only inspired Gross but generations of professional and amateur gamblers. Several students at MIT successfully used the card counting method, and their exploits became the basis for the 2003 best-selling book, Bringing Down the House, by Ben Mezrich, and subsequent film, "21", starring Kevin Spacey.

After Thorpe’s book was published, several wealthy individuals bankrolled Thorp so he could apply his system at casinos. He was originally welcomed by casinos as they didn’t see him as a threat. As his fame spread, Thorp started wearing disguises, but the mobsters who ran the casinos at that time were onto him and fought back (through violence and other means).

The public corporations which eventually took over the running of casinos from mobsters became smarter at eliminating card counting. They altered table rules to discourage gamblers from counting opportunities.

With the money he’d amassed from gambling, Thorp began investing in the stock market. He figured gamblers and investors shared the same psychological makeup. He developed a system based on arbitraging the price differences of two correlated securities, such as a company’s shares and its warrants.

He outlined his system in the book, ‘Beat the Market’, in 1967 and formed a hedge fund in 1969 to put the theory to work. Over the next 19 years, Thorp’s hedge fund returned 20% per annum, or a cumulative 2,734% compared to the S&P 500’s 545%.

In 1991, Thorp was a consultant to hedge funds and a client asked him to review his portfolio. Thorp approved the portfolio with one exception – an investment in a hedge fund run by a guy called Bernie Madoff. Thorp saw that Madoff’s returns were fake. 17 years later, Madoff was indicted for a Ponzi scheme worth almost US$65 billion. Thorpe said he didn’t blow the whistle on Madoff as he owed a duty of confidentiality to his own client.

Buffett’s edge

Before Thorp, Warren Buffett had developed his own odds-based system for beating the stock market. He started by following his teacher Benjamin Graham into value stocks, where he’d often buy a stock valued well below the net assets on its balance sheet. He eventually changed his investment system to focus on quality stocks valued cheaply.

As his publicly listed company, Berkshire Hathaway, got larger, Buffett started buying whole companies. He became attracted to insurance companies, which gave him two things:

  • A cheaper source of funding than offered by banks or equity markets
  • A way to play the odds via insurance.

Buffett realised that insurance was an odds-based system, where you price insurance according to the odds of a future event happening. Insurance has since formed the backbone of Buffett’s empire.

Buffett’s partner, Charlie Munger, has expressed how he uses the horse racing betting system as a way to approach investing in the stock market:

“To us, investing is the equivalent of going out and betting against the pari-mutuel system. We look for the horse with one chance in two of winning which pays you three to one. You’re looking for a mispriced gamble. That’s what investing is. And you have to know enough to know whether the gamble is mispriced. That’s value investing.”

Mohnish Pabrai’s dhandho investing

Buffett follower, and successful investor, Mohnish Pabrai, has put his own spin on things with ‘dhandho investing’ – investing in stocks where there’s a high degree of uncertainty but low risk. Pabrai suggests most investors mistakenly see high uncertainty and high risk as the same thing:

“Low risk and high uncertainty is a wonderful combination. It leads to severely depressed prices for businesses – especially in the pari-mutuel system-based stock market. Dhandho entrepreneurs first focus on minimizing downside risk. Low-risk situations, by definition, have low downsides. The high uncertainty can be dealt with by conservatively handicapping the range of possible outcomes. You end up with the classic Dhandho tagline: Heads, I win; tails, I don’t lose much.”

Pabrai gives several examples of low risk, high uncertainty opportunities that his fund has invested in. In 2000, he invested in a US funeral services business, Stewart Enterprises, whose stock had slumped more than 90% from its peak. Stewart had bought many other funeral services businesses (a roll-up business model) and taken on a huge amount of debt. The market was pricing the company as if it was about to go bankrupt.

Pabrai saw that bankruptcy was possible, but also that the business was making good money, and had options to refinance its debt and sell-off some businesses to raise cash. He reasoned that the risks of bankruptcy were low, while the odds of the business getting through their bad patch were high. Soon after, the company announced that it was considering selling its businesses outside the US and the stock price took off. Pabrai doubled his money in under a year.

In this week's edition ...

Michael O'Neill from IML thinks it's time to double down on dividends. He believes capital growth will disappoint over the next decade, making dividends critical to overall returns. Dividend stocks he likes include Aurizon, Metcash, Orica and Suncorp.

Bruce Murphy and colleagues at Insight Investment agree more defensive positioning is the way forward. But they argue the case for investing in investment grade credit, which can now achieve long-term return objectives through income alone, without the drawdown risk inherent in equity markets.

Gemma Dale breaks down how nabtrade investors are already getting defensive as the new year begins. Retail investors are retaining high cash levels, and unlike during Covid, they aren't buying market dips. A contrarian signal for the brave, perhaps?

The Mercer Investments research team believe inflation should remain top of mind for investors. They see eerie parallels to the 1970s and like then, natural resources, energy and inflation-protected bonds should outperform.

Meantime, Romano Sala Tenna is fired up about the active versus passive investment debate. He thinks the question of active versus passive managers rests on the lazy assumption that it isn't possible to consistently choose managers that consistently outperform. But both the premise and narrative are flawed, in his view.

We’re in a rare moment where the term premium has been negative for a number of years. History tells us that won't last, and Shane Woldendorp says that as the term premium returns to normal, it'll favour value-driven, bottom-up stock pickers.

Jeremy Gibson is focused elsewhere: on structural growth in the healthcare sector. He suggests the long-term outlook will increasingly be about advances in cell and gene therapies, and genomics. Companies that provide parts and services for vaccines and other therapies are uniquely placed to benefit and where he sees the biggest opportunities.

In the weekend update by Morningstar, Megan Neil reports on 11 Australian stocks to buy for this year, while Sarah Dowling looks back on the best and worst ASX performers in 2022.

Finally, in this week's white paper, Van Eck highlights a global paradigm shift, through a combination of central bank tightening, decarbonisation, unprecedented sanctions and convergence of energy and security policies. It advises investors to avoid risk assets, buy bonds and avoid highly volatile and speculative equities.

***

Weekend market update

In the US on Friday, a lighter than expected 4.6% average annual hourly wage growth reading in December payrolls data ignited a scalding cross-asset rally. The S&P 500 ripped higher by 2.3% while Treasury yields dove across the curve, highlighted by the two-yield note plummeting to 4.24% from 4.45% yesterday. WTI crude held just below $74 a barrel, gold jumped back to near seven-month highs at $1,871 an ounce, and the VIX retreated to 21. 

From AAP Netdesk: The big mining companies helped propel the ASX higher for a third straight session on Friday. The benchmark S&P/ASX200 index finished near the highs of the day on Friday, up 46 points, or 0.65%, to a two-week high of 7190.6. The broader All Ordinaries gained 49.5 points, or 0.68%, to 7308.8.

The materials sector had its best day in seven weeks, climbing 3% as BHP added 3.2% to $47.51. Fortescue Metals gained 3.7% to $21.80, Rio Tinto closed up 2.4% to $119.63 and South32 added 4.4 per cent to $4.25.

Goldminer Newcrest advanced 2.6% to $22.17 after receiving $173 million in an early repayment from a gold prepay credit facility it acquired from Canada's Lundin Gold in 2020.

Lithium miners Pilbara and Allkem were both at two-week highs, up 6.5% to $3.96, and 4.9% to $11.91, respectively.

Coalminers had a strong session, with Yancoal gaining 6.8%, New Hope adding 2.9%, Stanmore Resources finishing up 5.7% at an all-time high of $3.17 and coking coal producer Coronado climbing 4.4% to $2.02.

Elsewhere in the sector, oil and gas giant Woodside climbed 2.1% to $34.61.

Other than the commodities players, however, the market mostly lost a bit of puff.

Property trusts were the worst performing, down 1.1% with Dexus down 1.5% and Charter Hall declining 1.4%.

The big retail banks were mixed, with ANZ up 0.2% to $23.67, while Westpac dipped 0.3% to $23.40, NAB declined 0.6% to $29.76 and CBA edged 0.1% lower at $103.18.

Magellan plunged 10.5% to $8.68 after the fund manager disclosed that it experienced another $2.6 billion in outflows in December. It had $53.8 billion in funds under management as of December 31 - half of what it had just six months ago. Co-founder and chief investment officer Hamish Douglass went on medical leave 11 months ago and never returned.

The ASX itself was down 1.6% to $66.63 after disclosing that the average daily value traded on the exchange last month was down 8% from December 2021, to $5.3 billion.

James Gruber

 

Latest updates

PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter

Holiday reading: Firstlinks Interview Series 2021-22 eBook

Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website

 

10 Comments
Orsova
January 08, 2023

James,

It should be clear to you that I have a copy of the letters. I'm telling you what's in them. It's not 'speculation'. Obviously, I'm not going to post them publicly.

I just ran the numbers again, and - you're not going to like this - if you drop the first 3 periods (01,02,03), then PIF2 actually underperforms thru 2021 FYE. +405% vs +525%

It's even worse if you start the series in 2006. +157% vs 355%

As for PIF3 and PIF4, anybody who has the letters can verify my claims. The results are right there as plain as day.

I think I've made my point. If your incredulity is so iron willed that you won't accept what I'm saying, then..

Heads: I don't mind; Tails: I'll survive.

Best,
O

James Gruber
January 09, 2023

I'm not a big believer in cherry picking returns and would rather assess them in totality, across market cycles. I respect you have a different view, and that's ok with me.

Orsova
January 09, 2023

James,

In principle, it's a reasonable point that you make. However, I would suggest that you have our roles reversed. I'm arguing that all vintages in all funds bar an investment in the first few years of PIF2 have been lacklustre.

It's only by insisting that these 3 years are included in the assessment that you can claim that Pabrai has had impressive returns.

It's not me who's cherry picking.

Best,
O

Graeme
January 06, 2023

You've cherry picked, after the event, three investors who successfully employed a systematic edge system. What about all the investors who used such a system and weren't successful?

James Gruber
January 06, 2023

Hi Graeme, the investors mentioned used different ways to achieve success - Gross bought bonds cheaply, Thorp used arbitrage, Buffett used growth at a reasonable price, while Pabrai bought deep-value stocks. What they have in common is an odds-based or probabilistic mindset.

People can apply a mindset better than others, but that goes for anything in life.

James Gruber
January 06, 2023

Orsova, Pabrai doesn't publish official figures, however in William Green's book, Richer, Wiser, Happier, it states Pabrai's flagship fund returned 1204% from 2000-2018 compared with the S&P 500's 159%.

Orsova
January 07, 2023

Pabrai doesn't publish his returns publicly. Nevertheless, I can tell you the following with confidence:

The returns that Green is referring to are for PIF2, which was started in 2001. This is the fund that's outperforming. However, Pabrai has two other funds, PIF3 and PIF4, founded in 2002 and 2003, respectively. PIF4 is badly underwater. PIF3 has equalled the market.

What accounts for this discrepancy? It's quite simple. PIF2 was started as the tech bubble collapsed, and like all value investors, Pabrai sat that one out. His first two years, the SP500 was down hard, whilst he did well.

But if we observe the PIF2 record post this fortuitous beginning, he's badly underperformed.

His whole record hinges on his luck in sitting out the tech bubble. That's it. His reputation is no more than a product of vintage.

James Gruber
January 08, 2023

Hi Orsova, You seem to know a lot about each of his funds, even though he's never published returns for them. As for the reasons for outperformance on the main fund, without the returns, your reasoning is pure speculation. On the face of it though, for this main fund to return 11.5x over 18 years and to attribute that to just avoiding the 2000 tech crash, would seem a stretch. Separately, his book is well worth reading for insights into value investing.

Orsova
January 07, 2023

It’s not speculation. I have the numbers.

I didn’t say that his full record was a result of avoiding the tech crash, I said his outperformance was.

Orsova
January 06, 2023

I’m sorry, but anybody familiar with Pabrai’s returns knows that he hasn’t ‘trounced markets’. If anything, his risk adjusted returns are deeply worrisome.

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Vale Graham Hand

It’s with heavy hearts that we announce Firstlinks’ co-founder and former Managing Editor, Graham Hand, has died aged 66. Graham was a legendary figure in the finance industry and here are three tributes to him.

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, one year on

Last year, I wrote an article suggesting returns from ASX stocks would trample those from housing over the next decade. One year later, this is an update on how that forecast is going and what's changed since.

Avoiding wealth transfer pitfalls

Australia is in the early throes of an intergenerational wealth transfer worth an estimated $3.5 trillion. Here's a case study highlighting some of the challenges with transferring wealth between generations.

Taxpayers betrayed by Future Fund debacle

The Future Fund's original purpose was to meet the unfunded liabilities of Commonwealth defined benefit schemes. These liabilities have ballooned to an estimated $290 billion and taxpayers continue to be treated like fools.

Australia’s shameful super gap

ASFA provides a key guide for how much you will need to live on in retirement. Unfortunately it has many deficiencies, and the averages don't tell the full story of the growing gender superannuation gap.

Looking beyond banks for dividend income

The Big Four banks have had an extraordinary run and it’s left income investors with a conundrum: to stick with them even though they now offer relatively low dividend yields and limited growth prospects or to look elsewhere.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

9 lessons from 2024

Key lessons include expensive stocks can always get more expensive, Bitcoin is our tulip mania, follow the smart money, the young are coming with pitchforks on housing, and the importance of staying invested.

Investment strategies

Time to announce the X-factor for 2024

What is the X-factor - the largely unexpected influence that wasn’t thought about when the year began but came from left field to have powerful effects on investment returns - for 2024? It's time to select the winner.

Shares

Australian shares struggle as 2020s reach halfway point

It’s halfway through the 2020s decade and time to get a scorecheck on the Australian stock market. The picture isn't pretty as Aussie shares are having a below-average decade so far, though history shows that all is not lost.

Shares

Is FOMO overruling investment basics?

Four years ago, we introduced our 'bubbles' chart to show how the market had become concentrated in one type of stock and one view of the future. This looks at what, if anything, has changed, and what it means for investors.

Shares

Is Medibank Private a bargain?

Regulatory tensions have weighed on Medibank's share price though it's unlikely that the government will step in and prop up private hospitals. This creates an opportunity to invest in Australia’s largest health insurer.

Shares

Negative correlations, positive allocations

A nascent theme today is that the inverse correlation between bonds and stocks has returned as inflation and economic growth moderate. This broadens the potential for risk-adjusted returns in multi-asset portfolios.

Retirement

The secret to a good retirement

An Australian anthropologist studying Japanese seniors has come to a counter-intuitive conclusion to what makes for a great retirement: she suggests the seeds may be found in how we approach our working years.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.