Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 531

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 531 with weekend update

  •   19 October 2023
  • 7
  •      
  •   

The Weekend Edition includes a market update plus Morningstar adds links to two additional articles.

A few weeks ago, we published an article called 'Why LICs are closing and more should follow'. The last couple of weeks have seen three important developments for Listed Investment Companies (LICs) or Trust (LITs) as issuers act to remove the unacceptable discounts that are costing investors 20% or more in some cases. In fact, large premiums are almost as bad because investors are paying far more than they should.

First up, Steve Johnson's Forager (ASX:FOR) announced its intention to delist. This is a critical proof point because seven years ago, Forager changed from a closed-end, unlisted fund to a LIT in a surge of optimism for the benefits of listing. Now, Forager is going back despite the tedious legal work:

"It is the Manager’s view that investor apathy towards closed-ended investment vehicles has become entrenched and that smaller, less liquid vehicles like FOR are unlikely to trade at NAV for the foreseeable future. The Manager’s current view is that the magnitude and sustained nature of the discount to NAV now outweighs the portfolio management benefits of remaining a closed-ended fund. The Manager has considered a range of additional measures to further improve the traded market price of FOR units. The Manager currently considers that the solution which will be in the best interests of FOR unitholders is likely to be the orderly transition of FOR back to an open-ended fund."

To his credit, Johnson is risking investor redemptions to remove the discount, although many of his investors have confirmed their intention to stay.

Second and equally critical is Magellan's announcement to move the closed-end Magellan Global Fund (ASX:MGF) to open-ended some time in the first half of 2024. We have also covered this in detail including the agitation by Nick Bolton regarding the option value. Magellan said:

"The Board of Magellan has today determined to consider a conversion of the Closed Class Units into Open Class Units, as this should, if implemented, permanently address the trading discount to NAV per Unit, while providing unitholders with a means to still transact on the securities exchange. Additionally, Magellan intends to continue to execute on the initiatives it has previously outlined that are value accretive and seek to deliver improved outcomes for unitholders.

A conversion raises considerable complexities requiring significant work to address and Magellan will have regard to legal, regulatory and tax matters that require detailed assessment. Any conversion would be subject to a number of conditions, including member and regulatory approvals."

As foreshadowed in our article, the conversion will happen sometime in 2024 but the Board is making no timing commitments, and in the meantime, they need to address the continuing push by Nick Bolton.

Then in a response on Friday, the Board of MGF issued the following announcement to the exchange in response to Bolton wanting a meeting of MGF Unitholders:

"Magellan has considered the validity of the Meeting Request and has concerns that the Meeting Request is invalid and ineffective. Magellan has today filed a summons with the Supreme Court of New South Wales seeking judicial advice and direction pursuant to section 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) to the effect that, having regard to the Meeting Request, Magellan would be justified in declining to call and arrange the meeting of MGF Unitholders and treating the Meeting Request as invalid and ineffective ... The Meeting Request received from certain MGF Unitholders is not made in accordance with section 252D of the Act and is made by MGF Unitholders carrying less than 5% of votes that may be cast at a meeting."

Third, Geoff Wilson of Wilson Asset Management, the most outspoken supporter of LICs with his own company championing the structure across eight issues, is marketing a $500 million to $1 billion raise for an open-ended version of WAM Leaders (ASX:WLE). Wilson rang me to explain that to participate with the big players in the large cap space, where supply is offered by brokers in IPOs and share sales, he needs a fund of a few billion, or double his current $1.7 billion in WLE. Wilson in open-ended and not LICs is a sign of the times.

***

The Indigenous Voice vote is off-topic for Firstlinks but there is an important parallel between politicians and investment professionals. Many fund managers think the harder they work, the better their results. There's always another stone to turn over and they pride themselves on their commitment to "working hard" for their investors. In the office early, read emails and screens, check limitless market updates, run the morning meeting, coffee with a CEO, lunch with a client, back to the office to check the market, present a webinar, stay late. Hopefully, somewhere in there, they find time for investing, the real meat and potatoes.

Writing in The Conversation, Michelle Grattan explained that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese looks exhausted after his effort on the Voice:

"These past few weeks have also suggested Albanese will need to manage his energy better if he is to perform well for the long haul. Obviously he wanted to do all he could in the final days of the campaign. But tearing around the country, when it was clear the vote was lost, was excessive and left him looking exhausted. Leaders are stronger and tougher than the rest of us. But they are not superhuman, and they need to pace themselves if they are not to wear out, lose focus, and become frazzled and tetchy."

It does nobody any favours when a leader or a fund manager is exhausted. Contrast most fund managers with Warren Buffett, who runs a company rather than a fund. He said:

“I insist on a lot of time being spent, almost every day, to just sit and think. That is very uncommon in American business. I read and think, so I do more reading and thinking, and make less impulsive decisions than most people in business. I do it because I like this kind of life.”

He claims to read 500 pages a day, a target few if any fund managers could match. He says that knowledge compounds so he spends perhaps 80% of his work time reading. In many work offices, it would look like inactivity.

Next time you speak to a fund manager, don't focus on their views on the economy or interest rates or inflation. These macro meanderings are mainly best guesses. Ask them how they spend their precious time and what they have read in the last week.

***

US analyst Charlie Bilello has a reputation for creating fascinating charts like this one. The Wilshire 5000 is an index of all listed stocks actively-traded in the US (not necessarily 5,000 companies) and this table shows the worst 9-month periods for the index between 1971 and 2023, or 52 years. They are all falls of over 21%. Amazingly, only in one of those 20 periods was the subsequent one-year forward return negative, and the average return is 27%, and always strongly positive over subsequent periods. It's an illustration of how the stockmarket can recover from the depths of despair. But it also shows 20 falls over 20% in 52 years, or one every two to three years.

Martin J. Whitman founded Third Avenue and was a well-known portfolio manager and author, and he wrote:

“When securities prices decline, an investor’s perspective can go in one of two directions. The vast majority of investors view a price decline as a loss of value. This has a basis in reality for those who are traders, those whose portfolios are financed with borrowed money, and those who have little or no knowledge about the companies in whose securities they have invested. For value investors, though, price declines frequently mean nothing more than that yields have rallied. The same securities with the same fundamentals, and without any permanent impairments of capital, have become available at far more attractive pricing than was previously available.”

Which is a good segue to my article where I look at the biggest loss in my own SMSF this year. I am not a stock picker so we attach a fuller report from Morningstar Equity Analyst, Alexander Prineas. I write it more as a personal investor, why I bought the stock and why I'm hanging on although it's fallen out of favour. It's a daily dilemma for every fund manager somewhere in their portfolio.

***

When we focus on the potential future moves in the US S&P500, and the likelihood that returns will be lower in coming years due to high Price to Earnings (P/E) ratios, we need to separate the Magnificent Seven tech stocks trading at a P/E of 27 and the other 493 stocks at a P/E of 16. No wonder the Australian stock market can't keep up with the US market driven by these seven.

Investing times have changed following a 40-year rally in bond rates until 2020. Nothing shows this more than the losses on the most important bond in the world, the US 10-year bellwether, against which other assets are priced, including the discount rate used in valuing companies. We are investing during the worst drawdowns (losses).

***

Finally, a quick word on crypto as it's back in the headlines as other assets struggle. This is when promoters jump on the future potential, the need to allocate a proportion of a portfolio to crypto, the currency of the future. This week, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) reminded SMSF trustees of the resources available:

"Investing in crypto can be complex and risky so we recommend trustees seek financial advice before investing and read both MoneySmart and the our SMSF investing in crypto assets page.

You can also check out our short crypto myth busting videos:

SMSFs investing in crypto – reminds you of your regulatory obligations you need to meet when investing in crypto assets

Lost access for my crypto – provides details of how your SMSF may be able to claim a capital loss in situations where you lose your password or your crypto is stolen."

Graham Hand

Also in this week's edition...

Meg Heffron has looked at the draft legislation published earlier this month for ‘Division 296 tax’ and doesn't like what she sees. This is the proposed new tax on members with more than $3 million in super, the 15% tax on part of their super so-called 'earnings' each year. Meg says even the promise to allow these members to carry forward any losses has a few quirks.

APRA is investigating bank hybrid securities to better secure bank capital and the broader financial system, with special emphasis on retail investors holding hybrids. BondAdviser's Charlie Callan and his team examine what could eventuate from the investigation and the implications for current hybrid holders.

At Firstlinks, we have regular articles on how to build wealth for your retirement, yet there's a lot more to retirement than that. Leaving work can lead to a loss of identify if there's a failure to craft a new life and it's a big shock for many retirees. Jon Glass of 64 Plus and previously well known to many readers as the CIO of Media Super offers his tips on how to best prepare for retirement.

Who thought bonds could be sexy again? Investors have been piling into them despite the asset class heading for its third straight down year. Given the yields on offer and the prospects for an economic recession, the lure of bonds is understandable. Van Eck's Cameron McCormack has a primer to help investors decide which bonds may be best for them.

Is a recession on the cards, though? Talaria Capital's Hugh Selby-Smith thinks so. It's unusual for an Australian fund manager to be pessimistic on the market outlook but Hugh details why he's on red-alert and what investors can do.

Morningstar's Peter Warnes is in a similar camp to Hugh as he predicts a protracted global recession starting mid next year, in the latest Wealth of Experience podcast. The podcast also features James Gruber on the investment art of doing nothing and Graham Hand on tax-free super.

Trend-following strategies have been around for some time, though they still don't receive a lot of press. Man Group's Kit Cherry thinks these strategies should be part of an investor's arsenal as they provide diversification benefits and can help protect downside risks to portfolios.

Two extra articles from Morningstar for the weekend. Shani Jayamanne looks at three cheap, fully franked stocks, while Shaun Ler thinks an ASX-listed asset manager has a lot of upside

Leisa Bell unveils the results of last week's Firstlink's survey on inflation. The survey generated some intriguing data, including reader experience of worst inflation than the official data.

And lastly, in this week's White Paper, Neuberger Berman has its fixed income outlook for the fourth quarter on this year.

***

Weekend market update

On Friday in the US, stocks sank 1.2% on the S&P 500 to have its lowest finish since the end of May. Treasurys managed a modest bounce, with 2- and 30-year yields closing at 5.07% and 5.09% respectively, down seven and two basis points, as the long bond settled above its policy-sensitive peer for the first time this year. Gold reversed after nearing US$2,000 per ounce to end at US$1,980 per ounce, while WTI crude was steady at US$88 per barrel.

From AAP Netdesk:

The Australian share market on Friday dropped precipitously for a second day, closing at two-and-a-half week low amid the spiralling conflict in the Middle East and soaring US bond yields. The benchmark S&P/ASX200 index finished down 80.9 points, or 1.16%, to 6,900.7, while the broader All Ordinaries fell 83 points, or 1.16%, to 7,089.7. The close was the ASX200's third lowest of the year, only exceeded on October 4 and March 20, leaving it down 2.1% for the week and 2.0% for the year.

The mining sector was the biggest loser, down 1.7%, as BHP dropped 1.8% to $44.43, Fortescue fell 2.2% to $21.39 and Rio Tinto retreated 0.7% to $114.62.

Also, Liontown Resources had plunged 31.9% to a seven-month low of $1.90 after raising $365 million at a deep discount of $1.80. The capital raising, which will be used to fund the company's globally significant Kathleen Valley lithium project in WA, comes just days after US lithium giant Albemarle walked away from its $3-per-share takeover offer for Liontown following Gina Rinehart's Hancock Prospecting acquiring a significant stake in the company.

Goldminers Northern Star and Evolution rose 1.3% and 2.2% respectively, as gold traded at a three-month high of $US1,980 an ounce - or an all-time high of $3,136 in Australian dollars.

All the Big Four banks finished lower, with NAB falling 1.6% to $28.65, CBA dipping 1% to $98.75 and Westpac and ANZ both retreating 1.4%, to $20.86 and $25.27, respectively.

Insignia Financial fell 12.8% to an all-time low of $2.04 after announcing that "by mutual agreement" chief executive Renato Mota would step down in February after 20 years with the financial advice company formerly known as IOOF, the last five as its CEO.

Cleanaway Waste Management fell 1.3% to $2.35 as the waste management company forecast $350 million in earnings for 2023/24, with CEO Mark Schubert reporting a strong start to the new financial year.

From Shane Oliver, AMP:

Fed Chair Powell’s comments in the last week were balanced but they still pushed bond yields higher. Powell indicated that the Fed is “attentive” to stronger growth but also to the tightening in financial conditions flowing from higher bond yields and so it can proceed “carefully” – implying no hike in November. But because he didn’t pushback against higher bond yields and said the Fed should let it “play out” and that the neutral rate of interest may now be higher it provided a green light for a further lift in the US 10-year bond yield, which rose to around 5%. 

The risk of another rate hike in Australia is high with the RBA getting nervous about the upside risks to inflation. The RBA was out with a somewhat more hawkish message in the last week via the minutes from the last meeting and a “fireside chat” with Governor Bullock. The key messages are that:

  • monetary policy is working to slow spending & ease inflation;
  • there are few signs of a wage price spiral;
  • but services inflation is sticky, with the rise in petrol prices, potentially made worse by the war in Israel adding to the risks;
  • the rise in house prices might support household spending and may suggest monetary policy is not as tight as assumed;
  • upside risks to inflation are a concern given how long inflation is likely to be above target, as the longer its above target the more long-term inflation expectations may rise making it even harder to get inflation back to target; so
  • the RBA has a “low tolerance” for a slower fall in inflation than expected and if its higher than expected then it would respond.

Of course, the RBA has long been flagging that “some further tightening in monetary policy may be required” but its communications over the last week are somewhat more hawkish than flagged in the statement following its last board meeting. This may just be jawboning and an effort by the new Governor to highlight that she is just as determined to get inflation down as Governor Lowe and so is all aimed at keeping long term inflation expectations down. But the clear message is that the risk of another rate hike is high and the RBA has flagged that it will be looking at things very closely at its November meeting after the latest run of data on jobs, economic activity and inflation along with revised RBA forecasts.

We had put the risk of another rate hike at 40% but following the RBA’s latest communications now see it as being close to 50%. Jobs data in the past week was mixed – with slowing jobs growth but still low unemployment – leaving the September quarter inflation data due Wednesday as key to whether the RBA hikes again in November. We think the inflation data will come in roughly in line with RBA forecasts and so no change from the RBA on rates remains our base case, but the risk is on the upside leaving the rates call a very close one. The money market has priced in a 22% chance of a rate hike in November (up from just 6% a week ago) & 100% chance by March (up from 40% a week ago).

Curated by James Gruber and Leisa Bell

 

Latest updates

PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter

ASX Listed Bond and Hybrid rate sheet from NAB/nabtrade

Listed Investment Company (LIC) Indicative NTA Report from Bell Potter

Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website

 

7 Comments
Jim Lane
October 23, 2023

Interestingly, whenever the LIC (closed vs open entities) topic arises, their supporters are more visible than those favoring EFT's (apparently a younger demographic). Perhaps, there's a pendulum at play here and Mr Market will change his tune when the plethora of EFT's are tested by a significant correction and run for redemptions. I'll be ready to top up on discounted LIC's!
The example of MGF converting to an open structure may be as much a symptom of the M name suffering a case of freefall and desperation on some fronts for a while?

CC
October 23, 2023

I expect you mean ETFs not EFTs.
the popular ETFs such as VAS, VGS, A200, IOZ, STW , QUAL, etc have market caps in the billions and there
was no problem during the 30%+ correction during COVID.
LICs and ETFs both have their pros and cons and both can have a place in portfolios.

Scully
October 23, 2023

I fully appreciate the sentiment in the analysis of the Wilshire 5000 analysis: equity market downturns are usually followed by strong recoveries.
However the analysis is not quite as definitive as it looks. There are actually only 5 independent observation periods covered by the analysis, not 20.
Eight of the 20 nine month periods shown include October 2008 - the large negative returns of the 8 observations are effectively picking up that month's fall and the rally from March 2009. It is the same event repeatedly shown in the table.
Similarly, there are 7 nine month periods covering 1973/74. All include the June quarter 1974 and while I don't recall the events that quarter, I am assuming equity markets didn't do well!
There are 2 dependent observations in 2001 and 2 in 2002, while only one in 2022. Last year was a bit anomalous - a steady decline without a single month distorting multiple periods.

Richard
October 22, 2023

The LIC discount to NTA is really only of concern if you bought your shares at a lower discount, at a premium, or at NTA when originally listed. If an LIC trades fairly consistently at, say, a 10% discount to NTA, it really should be no issue for a new investor to the LIC, as long as they accept that that discount will likely persist at, or somewhere near, that 10% mark.

And the ability for the large LICs to pay consistent, fully franked dividends should not be under estimated.

Graeme
October 20, 2023

While I agree with the sentiment, I suggest CC's problems are not with open ended funds as such, but with the trust structure. Close ended trusts may still have a 'plethora of items' which arrive after the end of the finacial year to which they apply, whereas open ended ICs (yes, they do exist) pay their dividend, as do LICs, months before 30 June. Dividends paid after 30 June go in the next years tax. Open ended ICs possibly have the best of both worlds as the couple I own trade at NTA.

CC
October 20, 2023

yes about the open ended trust structure,
but I've never received a tax statement from my LICs such AFI, AUI, WLE, LSF, MFF etc, only dividend statements.

CC
October 19, 2023

Open ended funds are such a pain at tax time, with often complex AMIT reports containing a plethora of items and a whole years worth of distributed capital gains that the individual investor is liable for even if they bought the fund a week before June 30.
I recall once receiving a tax statement that contained $8000 of capital gains that i had to enter on my tax return even though the unit price was barely different from 12 months earlier. What's the point of investing in that !?
I'd much rather the simplicity of LIC fully franked dividends.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Why LIC discount harvesting is a buy-and-hold decision

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Vale Graham Hand

It’s with heavy hearts that we announce Firstlinks’ co-founder and former Managing Editor, Graham Hand, has died aged 66. Graham was a legendary figure in the finance industry and here are three tributes to him.

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, one year on

Last year, I wrote an article suggesting returns from ASX stocks would trample those from housing over the next decade. One year later, this is an update on how that forecast is going and what's changed since.

Taxpayers betrayed by Future Fund debacle

The Future Fund's original purpose was to meet the unfunded liabilities of Commonwealth defined benefit schemes. These liabilities have ballooned to an estimated $290 billion and taxpayers continue to be treated like fools.

Australia’s shameful super gap

ASFA provides a key guide for how much you will need to live on in retirement. Unfortunately it has many deficiencies, and the averages don't tell the full story of the growing gender superannuation gap.

Looking beyond banks for dividend income

The Big Four banks have had an extraordinary run and it’s left income investors with a conundrum: to stick with them even though they now offer relatively low dividend yields and limited growth prospects or to look elsewhere.

AFIC on its record discount, passive investing and pricey stocks

A triple headwind has seen Australia's biggest LIC swing to a 10% discount and scuppered its relative performance. Management was bullish in an interview with Firstlinks, but is the discount ever likely to close?

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

9 lessons from 2024

Key lessons include expensive stocks can always get more expensive, Bitcoin is our tulip mania, follow the smart money, the young are coming with pitchforks on housing, and the importance of staying invested.

Investment strategies

Time to announce the X-factor for 2024

What is the X-factor - the largely unexpected influence that wasn’t thought about when the year began but came from left field to have powerful effects on investment returns - for 2024? It's time to select the winner.

Shares

Australian shares struggle as 2020s reach halfway point

It’s halfway through the 2020s decade and time to get a scorecheck on the Australian stock market. The picture isn't pretty as Aussie shares are having a below-average decade so far, though history shows that all is not lost.

Shares

Is FOMO overruling investment basics?

Four years ago, we introduced our 'bubbles' chart to show how the market had become concentrated in one type of stock and one view of the future. This looks at what, if anything, has changed, and what it means for investors.

Shares

Is Medibank Private a bargain?

Regulatory tensions have weighed on Medibank's share price though it's unlikely that the government will step in and prop up private hospitals. This creates an opportunity to invest in Australia’s largest health insurer.

Shares

Negative correlations, positive allocations

A nascent theme today is that the inverse correlation between bonds and stocks has returned as inflation and economic growth moderate. This broadens the potential for risk-adjusted returns in multi-asset portfolios.

Retirement

The secret to a good retirement

An Australian anthropologist studying Japanese seniors has come to a counter-intuitive conclusion to what makes for a great retirement: she suggests the seeds may be found in how we approach our working years.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.